Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Science and Technology Council | FED |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
At present, the treatment of Bipolar I disorder (BD-I), especially its depressive episode (bipolar depression), is still limited, because there is no effective treatment for the associated cognitive impairment and perceived stress. NMDA receptor (NMDAR) dysfunction is associated with BD-I, particularly its cognitive impairment and perceived stress. This study aims to examine the efficacy and safety of an NMDA enhancer (NMDAE) in the treatment of cognitive impairment and perceived stress in the patients with bipolar depression.
Bipolar I disorder (BD-I) is a severe brain disorder. At present, the treatment of BD-I, especially its depressive episode (bipolar depression), is still limited, because there is no effective treatment for the associated cognitive impairment and perceived stress. This study aims to examine the efficacy and safety of an NMDA enhancer (NMDAE) in the treatment of cognitive impairment and perceived stress in the patients with bipolar depression.
The subjects are bipolar depression patients. They have been treated for bipolar depression for at least four weeks but remain depressive. Participating in this study, they will continue the original treatment, and will be randomized, double-blindly to receive the NMDAE or placebo for 8 weeks. We will measure 6 cognitive domains (including 9 cognitive tests) and quality of life at weeks 0 and 8; and assess the Perceived Stress Scale, Global Assessment of Function (GAF), various scales for clinical symptoms, and side effects at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8.
The efficacies of NMDAE and placebo will be compared. Chi-square (or Fisher's exact test) will be used to compare differences of categorical variables and t-test (or Mann-Whitney test if the distribution is not normal) for continuous variables between treatment groups. Mean changes from baseline in repeated-measure assessments will be assessed using the generalized estimating equation (GEE). All p values for clinical measures will be based on two-tailed tests with a significance level of 0.05.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| NMDAE | Experimental | An NMDA enhancer |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Placebo |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMDAE | Drug | Use of an NMDA enhancer for the treatment of bipolar depression |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Visual Continuous Performance Test | Assessment of sustained attention | week 0, 8 |
| Change in Wisconsin Card Sorting Test | Assessment of abstract and shift set | week 0, 8 |
| Change in Logical Memory Test of the Wechsler Memory Scale | Assessment of episodic memory | week 0, 8 |
| Digit Span | Assessment of verbal working memory | week 0, 8 |
| Spatial Span | Assessment of nonverbal working memory | week 0, 8 |
| Category Fluency | Assessment of speed of processing | week 0, 8 |
| Trail Marking A | Assessment of speed of processing | week 0, 8 |
| WAIS-III Digit Symbol-Coding | Assessment of speed of processing | week 0, 8 |
| Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) V2.0 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Quality of life (SF-36) | week 0, 8 | |
| Change in Global Assessmeint of Functioning | Assessment of global improvement. Minimum value: 1, maximum value:100, the higher scores mean a better outcome. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hsien-Yuan Lane Lane, M.D., Ph.D | Contact | 886 4 22052121 | 1855 | hylane@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital | Recruiting | Taichung | Taiwan |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001714 | Bipolar Disorder |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068105 | Bipolar and Related Disorders |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo Cap |
| Drug |
Use of placebo as a comparator. |
|
Assessment of social cognition
| week 0, 8 |
| Change in Perceived Stress Scale in Perceived Stress Scale | Assessment of stress and anxiety symptoms Minimum value: 0, maximum value:56, the higher scores mean a worse outcome. | week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 |
| Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 |
| Change in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression | Assessment of depressive symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:52, the higher scores mean a worse outcome. | Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 |
| Change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale | Assessment of depressive symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:60, the higher scores mean a worse outcome. | Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 |
| Change in Young Mania Rating Scale | Assessment of manic symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:60, the higher scores mean a worse outcome. | Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 |
| Change in Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation | Assessment of Suicide Ideation. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:38, the higher scores mean a greater risk of suicide. | Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 |
| Change in Clinical Global Impression Scale | Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 |