Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this prospective trial is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the Glean Urodynamics System (GUS) for use in the clinic to collect vesical pressure data in adult males and females with lower urinary tract symptoms.
The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
• What is the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of GUS for use in clinical to collect vesical pressure data in adult males and females with lower urinary tract symptoms?
Participants will undergo a planned conventional urodynamics exam after which the Glean Sensor will be inserted and ambulatory urodynamics will be performed with the sensor indwelling in the bladder after which the sensor will be removed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glean Urodynamics System | Experimental | Wireless, catheter-free urodynamics system |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glean Urodynamics System | Device | Wireless, catheter-free urodynamics system |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Insertion Success | Percent of insertion attempts of the Glean sensor deemed successful | during the insertion procedure of a device |
| Percentage of Participants With a Device-related SAE | Device-related serious adverse events | up to 2 weeks |
| Percentage of Participants With Removal Success | Percent of removal attempts of the Glean sensor deemed successful | during the removal procedure of a device |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Rating Overall Comfort of Glean Urodynamics as Comfortable or Extremely Comfortable | Number of participants rating the overall comfort of Glean Urodynamics at comfortable or extremely comfortable | asked at end of Glean Urodynamics procedure |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Brittany Carter, DHSc, MPH | Bright Uro | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tri Valley Urology | Murrieta | California | 92562 | United States | ||
| Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37293725 | Background | Frainey BT, Majerus SJA, Derisavifard S, Lewis KC, Williams AR, Balog BM, Butler RS, Goldman HB, Damaser MS. First in Human Subjects Testing of the UroMonitor: A Catheter-free Wireless Ambulatory Bladder Pressure Monitor. J Urol. 2023 Jul;210(1):186-195. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003451. Epub 2023 Jun 9. | |
| 40314068 | Result |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Glean Urodynamics System | Wireless, catheter-free urodynamics system Glean Urodynamics System: Wireless, catheter-free urodynamics system |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Participants enrolled in the study
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Glean Urodynamics System | Wireless, catheter-free urodynamics system |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Insertion Success | Percent of insertion attempts of the Glean sensor deemed successful | 33/34 participants who underwent conventional urodynamics underwent an insertion attempt with the Glean Urodynamics System. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | during the insertion procedure of a device |
|
|
From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 2 weeks
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | All Participants | All participants enrolled in the study | 0 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Hematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Study not powered for any outcome or any comparisons; small sample size limits validity, generalizability, and applicability; order of procedures (i.e., conventional UDS occurring before Glean UDS) and the variability of standard-of-care may have influenced results such as attribution of harm; and participant recall bias due to the removal of the Glean sensor being the last procedure experienced (Kim, 2025).
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brittany Carter | Bright Uro | 9492025689 | brittany@brighturo.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 28, 2023 | Dec 3, 2025 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
| D014549 | Urinary Incontinence |
| D053201 | Urinary Bladder, Overactive |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Newport Beach |
| California |
| 92663 |
| United States |
| Stony Brook Medicine | East Setauket | New York | 11733 | United States |
| Palmetto Adult and Children's Urology | North Charleston | South Carolina | 29406 | United States |
| Urology Partners of North Texas | Arlington | Texas | 76017 | United States |
| Kim J, Xavier K, Cannon-Smith T, Vaughan T, Vemulapalli S, Zhao H, Aalami-Harandi A, Shah N. The Feasibility and Safety of the Glean Urodynamics System: The Modern Urodynamics System Efficacy Study. J Endourol. 2025 Jun;39(6):625-634. doi: 10.1089/end.2025.0270. Epub 2025 May 2. |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With a Device-related SAE | Device-related serious adverse events | Number of participants undergoing Glean Urodynamics | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | up to 2 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Rating Overall Comfort of Glean Urodynamics as Comfortable or Extremely Comfortable | Number of participants rating the overall comfort of Glean Urodynamics at comfortable or extremely comfortable | Number of participants who experienced Glean Urodynamics and completed the survey at the end of the urodynamics study visit | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | asked at end of Glean Urodynamics procedure |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Removal Success | Percent of removal attempts of the Glean sensor deemed successful | 32 participants had Glean successfully inserted and thus all had a successful removal. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | during the removal procedure of a device |
|
|
|
| 38 |
| 0 |
| 38 |
| 12 |
| 38 |
| EG001 | Glean Urodynamics System | Among those who underwent Glean Urodynamics | 0 | 32 | 0 | 32 | 7 | 32 |
| Genitourinary pain or discomfort | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysuria | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D014555 | Urination Disorders |
| D059411 | Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms |
| D020924 | Urological Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D001745 | Urinary Bladder Diseases |