BivaLirudin versUS Heparin in ECMO - A Registry-embedded, Randomised, Open Label, Feasibility Trial Comparing Two Anticoagulation Strategies in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)
BivaLirudin versUS Heparin in ECMO - A Registry-embedded, Randomised, Open Label, Feasibility Trial Comparing Two Anticoagulation Strategies in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)
The goal of this open label randomised clinical trial is to compare Bivalirudin versus Heparin for anticoagulation in patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.
The main question it aims to answer are include the ability to maintain anticoagulation within defined therapeutic range, bleeding and thrombotic complications and a comparison of the total cost of anticoagulation care.
Participants will be randomised to either anticoagulation with Bivalirudin or anticoagulation with Unfractionated Heparin.
Rationale:
Anticoagulation whilst on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is required. Bleeding and thrombotic complications whilst on ECMO are common and may effect the patient outcome. The optimal anticoagulant for ECMO patients is not clear and there exists no randomised control trial data comparing anticoagulants on ECMO. This Phase 2b trial will provide data to enable larger definitive phase III trials to determine the best anticoagulant whilst on ECMO.
Hypothesis: Hypothesis: In adults ECMO patients'; anticoagulation with Bivalirudin results in more samples within therapeutic range than unfractionated Heparin. Total anticoagulation costs with Bivalirudin are similar to unfractionated Heparin.
The objectives of this study is to assess anticoagulation protocol of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin and assess the to the cost of each protocol.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Sydney, New South Wales 2050, Australia
timothy.southwood@health.nsw.gov.au+61295156111
mark.dennis@sydney.edu.au+61295156111