Effect of Age on Sperm Recovery of Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction in Nonobstructive Azoospermia Patients
Effect of Age on Sperm Recovery of Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction in Nonobstructive Azoospermia Patients
Males with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) have an opportunity to obtain sperm by treatment with microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE), gold-standard surgical technique for them. The overall sperm retrieval rate (SRR) of mTESE in NOA patients is about 50%, but the predictive factors of SRR remain were understudied, especially the effect of age. The purpose of this study was to explore the factors influencing the SRR of mTESE in NOA patients with different etiologies.
Methods: This observational study recruit NOA patients treated with their first mTESE. The stratified research was used to investigate SRR by dividing patients into seven groups based on etiology. The primary outcome was SRR. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the factors influencing SRR.
As the most severe form of infertility, azoospermia is observed in approximately 10% to 15% of infertile males and can be classified as obstructive azoospermia (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), the latter of which cause spermatogenic dysfunction. Approximately 60% of NOA males are diagnosed with congenital, acquired, or idiopathic NOA (iNOA). The most common congenital causes of NOA are Klinefelter syndrome (KS) and Y chromosome azoospermia factor (AZF) deletions, whereas the acquired causes of NOA are mumps orchitis, cryptorchidism, cryptozoospermia, and iatrogenic causes (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism). For iNOA, the most common form of NOA, there is no clear cause in approximately 50-80% of cases.
As a prevalent chromosomal abnormality, KS with two or more X chromosomes is the most common form of congenital NOA that affects approximately 3-4% of infertile males and more than 10% of azoospermic males. The incidence of Y-chromosome AZF microdeletions in fertile males is 0.025%, but it increases to 2%-10% in infertile males. Mumps orchitis is the most common and serious complication of mumps virus infection in adolescents and young adults, with an incidence of 40% in males with postpubertal mumps, and approximately 30% of males suffer from infertility or subfertility. As an extremely severe form of oligozoospermia, cryptozoospermia is characterized by the absence of sperm in semen by microscopic examination but the presence of sperm in centrifuge sediment, with an incidence of approximately 8.73% in infertile males. Cryptorchidism represents one of the most common urogenital abnormalities in childhood, affecting 1.1%-45% of preterm and 1%-4.6% of full-term infants, and approximately 10% of infertile males have a history of cryptorchidism.
Obtaining sperm by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) is the primary treatment approach for males with NOA. The average sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in NOA males is approximately 50%, however, NOA patients with different etiologies have different SSRs ranging from 30% to 75%, with the highest and lowest SRRs corresponding to those with a history of mumps orchitis and iNOA, respectively. The predictive factors of SRR in males with NOA treated with mTESE include age; testis volume; serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone (T), inhibin B, and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and testicular histopathology. However, the relationship between SSR and age in NOA patients undergoing mTESE is unclear, with several studies reporting no association between SSR and age or a negative correlation between SSR and age. Other studies have reported that older age was predictive of successful sperm retrieval.
The goal of this study was to analyze the factors influencing the SRR in NOA patients with different etiologies treated with mTESE based on age, body mass index (BMI), testis volume hormone levels and infertility duration in a large cohort. Our findings provide valuable information on the likelihood of successful mTESE. Therefore, preoperative evaluations based on the information provided in this study will help patients and surgeons in selecting the best approach by shared decision-making.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: