Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this observational study is to learn about cytomegalovirus disease epidemiology in pediatric and adult liver transplant recipients in China. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prophylaxis Strategy Cohort | Consecutive patients receiving universal antiviral prophylaxis as the standard-of- care CMV prevention strategy post-transplant. | ||
| Preemptive Strategy Cohort | Consecutive patients managed with a preemptive therapy strategy (monitoring and treatment upon viremia) post-transplant. | ||
| No Prevention Strategy Cohort | Consecutive patients who did not receive systematic universal prophylaxis or preemptive therapy for CMV post-transplant. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant CMV Reactivation or CMV Disease | Clinically significant CMV reactivation was defined as a positive CMV-DNA PCR or pp65 antigenemia test in the context of clinical symptoms attributable to CMV. CMV disease was defined as evidence of CMV infection with documented end-organ disease (e.g., CMV hepatitis, colitis, pneumonitis) according to established international guidelines. | Within 12 months after liver transplantation |
| Number of Participants Who Completed the 12-Month Follow-up | Participants were considered to have completed the study if they were alive and did not experience CMV reactivation requiring study closure, and provided data through the 12-month post-transplant visit. | Within 12 months after liver transplantation |
| All-Cause Mortality | The occurrence of death from any cause within 12 months post-transplantation. As this was an observational study, mortality was assessed as an efficacy outcome (to calculate survival probability) rather than a solicited adverse event. Deaths were identified through scheduled study follow-ups, review of medical records, and when necessary, verification with civil registries. | Within 12 months after liver transplantation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Lost to Follow-up | Participants were considered lost to follow-up if they could not be contacted for scheduled study visits or assessments despite multiple attempts, and no outcome data could be obtained after their last contact. | Within 12 months after liver transplantation |
| Participants Asked to Withdraw |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The participates had received their first orthotopic liver transplantation within 10 days prior. And there are no gender restrictions. The number of participants are 800.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai General Hospital | Shanghai | China |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 1020 consecutive liver transplant recipients were screened for eligibility. Of these, 220 patients did not meet the inclusion criteria or declined to participate. Therefore, 800 patients were enrolled and constituted the study cohort
This investigation employed a prospective, observational cohort design conducted across six high-volume liver transplant centers in China: Shanghai General Hospital, Ruijin Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, West China Hospital, and Tianjin First Central Hospital. Recruitment occurred between August 2023 and June 2024, with a 12-month follow-up period for each participant concluding in June 2025.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Prophylaxis Strategy Cohort | Consecutive patients receiving universal antiviral prophylaxis as the standard-of-care CMV prevention strategy post-transplant. |
| FG001 | Preemptive Strategy Cohort | Consecutive patients managed with a preemptive therapy strategy (monitoring and treatment upon viremia) post-transplant. |
| FG002 | No Prevention Strategy Cohort | Consecutive patients who did not receive systematic universal prophylaxis or preemptive therapy for CMV post-transplant. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
A total of 1020 consecutive liver transplant recipients were screened for eligibility. Of these, 220 patients did not meet the inclusion criteria or declined to participate. Therefore, 800 patients were enrolled and constituted the study cohort.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Prophylaxis Strategy Cohort | Consecutive patients receiving universal antiviral prophylaxis as the standard-of-care CMV prevention strategy post-transplant. |
| BG001 | Preemptive Strategy Cohort |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant CMV Reactivation or CMV Disease | Clinically significant CMV reactivation was defined as a positive CMV-DNA PCR or pp65 antigenemia test in the context of clinical symptoms attributable to CMV. CMV disease was defined as evidence of CMV infection with documented end-organ disease (e.g., CMV hepatitis, colitis, pneumonitis) according to established international guidelines. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Within 12 months after liver transplantation |
|
From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 12 months
As an observational study, the protocol did not mandate solicitation of all adverse events. However, mortality (all-cause death) and serious adverse events leading to hospitalization or graft loss were actively collected as part of the study outcomes. Other non-serious adverse events were not systematically collected.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Prophylaxis Strategy Cohort | Consecutive patients receiving universal antiviral prophylaxis as the standard-of-care CMV prevention strategy post-transplant. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serious adverse events leading to hospitalization or graft loss | General disorders | Systematic Assessment | Any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or resulted in graft loss. |
Not provided
The observational design, while reflecting real-world practice, introduces potential for confounding despite multivariate adjustment. Variations in immunosuppression protocols and CMV monitoring techniques across centers, though reflecting clinical reality, may have influenced outcomes. Additionally, the lack of systematic assessment of antiviral resistance and detailed immunological parameters limits our ability to explore mechanistic explanations for the observed findings.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LZhong | Shanghai1st | +8617317371083 | q1-wt@163.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 12, 2023 | Sep 13, 2025 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Plasma and serum of recipients.
During follow-up, participants refuse to keep this study within 12 months after liver transplantation |
| Within 12 months after liver transplantation |
Consecutive patients managed with a preemptive therapy strategy (monitoring and treatment upon viremia) post-transplant.
| BG002 | No Prevention Strategy Cohort | Consecutive patients who did not receive systematic universal prophylaxis or preemptive therapy for CMV post-transplant. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| year |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| MELD score at transplant | The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is a prognostic scale used to assess the severity of chronic liver disease and prioritize patients for liver transplantation. It is calculated using serum bilirubin, serum creatinine, and the international normalized ratio (INR). The score ranges from 6 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity and a higher risk of short-term mortality. The score presented is the laboratory MELD score (without exception points) calculated from values obtained immediately prior to transplantation. | Mean | Inter-Quartile Range | units on a scale |
|
Consecutive patients managed with a preemptive therapy strategy (monitoring and treatment upon viremia) post-transplant.
| OG002 | No Prevention Strategy Cohort | Consecutive patients who did not receive systematic universal prophylaxis or preemptive therapy for CMV post-transplant. |
|
|
| Primary | Number of Participants Who Completed the 12-Month Follow-up | Participants were considered to have completed the study if they were alive and did not experience CMV reactivation requiring study closure, and provided data through the 12-month post-transplant visit. | 315 participants completed follow-up in prophylaxis group, 305 participants completed follow-up in preemptive group, and 166 participants completed follow-up in non-prevention group. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Within 12 months after liver transplantation |
|
|
|
| Primary | All-Cause Mortality | The occurrence of death from any cause within 12 months post-transplantation. As this was an observational study, mortality was assessed as an efficacy outcome (to calculate survival probability) rather than a solicited adverse event. Deaths were identified through scheduled study follow-ups, review of medical records, and when necessary, verification with civil registries. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Within 12 months after liver transplantation |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Lost to Follow-up | Participants were considered lost to follow-up if they could not be contacted for scheduled study visits or assessments despite multiple attempts, and no outcome data could be obtained after their last contact. | Five participants lost to follow-up in prophylaxis group, five participants lost to follow-up in preemptive group, and four participants lost to follow-up in non-prevention group. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Within 12 months after liver transplantation |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Participants Asked to Withdraw | During follow-up, participants refuse to keep this study within 12 months after liver transplantation | Non of participants asked to withdraw. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Within 12 months after liver transplantation |
|
|
|
| 16 |
| 320 |
| 55 |
| 320 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| EG001 | Preemptive Strategy Cohort | Consecutive patients managed with a preemptive therapy strategy (monitoring and treatment upon viremia) post-transplant. | 16 | 310 | 60 | 310 | 0 | 0 |
| EG002 | No Prevention Strategy Cohort | Consecutive patients who did not receive systematic universal prophylaxis or preemptive therapy for CMV post-transplant. | 13 | 170 | 40 | 170 | 0 | 0 |
|
Not provided
Not provided