Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aimed to evaluate postoperative pain intensity after glide-path preparation with the ProGlider (PG) and WaveOne Gold Glider (WOGG) systems in asymptomatic teeth with necrotic pulp and periapical lesions.Maxillary and mandibular molars with chronic apical periodontitis of 78 patients (age, 18-65 years) were included. The patients were randomly divided into three groups: control (n = 26), PG (n = 26), and WOGG (n = 26). All systems were used according to the manufacturer's instructions, and all root canal treatments were completed by a single operator within two sessions. Postoperative pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS) at 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, and 72 h. The intake of prescribed analgesics and abscess formation were also recorded.
Pain after root canal treatment is an important complication encountered in endodontic practice, with a reported prevalence of 3%-58%. Severe pain may start even 24 to 48 h after treatment. Postoperative pain has a complex etiology, including treatment factors under the control of the clinician, microbial factors related to the contents of infected root canals, patient demographic factors (patient sex and age, among others), immunological factors, local tissue changes, and psychological factors. Debris extrusion to the periapical tissues during root canal instrumentation can significantly influence the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain. The root canal instrumentation technique may play an important role in the occurrence of postoperative pain as it can induce an acute inflammatory response following periapical extrusion of necrotic tissues, infected debris, and bacteria. Previous clinical trials have evaluated the effect of reciprocation and continuous rotation kinematics on debris extrusion and postoperative pain; however, their results are conflicting.
The glide path is defined as a straight tunnel extending from the canal orifice to the physiological apical foramen. Glide-path preparation may prevent complications of root canal instrumentation; reduce risk of instrument failure, debris extrusion, and postoperative pain; and preserve root canal anatomy, thereby reducing the risk of transportation, perforation, and step and zip formation. Many NiTi glide-path file systems of different sizes and metallurgical properties have been introduced to date. Recently, a new single glide-path file system was introduced with the aim of reducing the number of files used and simplifying glide-path instrumentation.
The effect of glide-path file systems on postoperative pain has been studied previously. However, to the best of investigators' knowledge, there are no data comparing PG and WOGG glide-path files in terms of postoperative pain in asymptomatic teeth with necrotic pulp and periapical lesions. Therefore, the purpose of this in vivo study was to evaluate the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain in asymptomatic maxillary and mandibular molars with necrotic pulp and periapical lesions after glide-path preparation with a stainless-steel K-file and PG and WOGG glide-path file systems. The null hypothesis was that there is no difference in the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain between glide-path preparation techniques.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Experimental | Glide path preparation with hand files. |
|
| ProGlider | Experimental | Glide path preparation using rotational NiTi file. |
|
| WaveOne Gold Glider | Experimental | Glide path was preparation using reciprocating NiTi file. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Device | The operator prepared the glide path using a #15K-type stainless-steel hand file. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative pain intensity following the use of different glide path preparations | Postoperative pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS), The severity of pain varies between 0 to 10, in which 0 means no pain, while 10 means unbearable pain. | 6th hour |
| Postoperative pain intensity following the use of different glide path preparations | Postoperative pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS), The severity of pain varies between 0 to 10, in which 0 means no pain, while 10 means unbearable pain. | 12th hour |
| Postoperative pain intensity following the use of different glide path preparations | Postoperative pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS), The severity of pain varies between 0 to 10, in which 0 means no pain, while 10 means unbearable pain. | 18th hour |
| Postoperative pain intensity following the use of different glide path preparations | Postoperative pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS), The severity of pain varies between 0 to 10, in which 0 means no pain, while 10 means unbearable pain. | 24th hour |
| Postoperative pain intensity following the use of different glide path preparations | Postoperative pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS), The severity of pain varies between 0 to 10, in which 0 means no pain, while 10 means unbearable pain. | 48th hour |
| Postoperative pain intensity following the use of different glide path preparations | Postoperative pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS), The severity of pain varies between 0 to 10, in which 0 means no pain, while 10 means unbearable pain. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kubra Yesildal Yeter, Assoc. Prof. | Eskisehir Osmangazi University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eskisehir Osmangazi University | Eskişehir | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37924939 | Derived | Danaci Z, Yeter KY. Evaluation of Pain Following the Use of Different Single-file Glide Path Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2024 Feb;50(2):120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.10.017. Epub 2023 Nov 3. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010149 | Pain, Postoperative |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D010146 | Pain |
Not provided
Not provided
Group 1: control Group 2: ProGlider Group 3: WaveOne Gold Glider
Not provided
Not provided
The patient and statistician were blind to the groups but the operator who performed all treatment procedures could not be blinded to the study group owing to the study design.
| ProGlider | Device | The operator prepared the glide path using the ProGlider file. |
|
| WaveOne Gold Glider | Device | The operator prepared the glide path using the WaveOne Gold Glider file. |
|
| 72nd hour |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |