Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with skeletal class II malocclusion who have a retracted lower jaw will be treated in this study. The efficacy of clear Plates in the treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion will be assessed. The skeletal, dental and soft tissues changes resulted by this intervention will be studied and compared with the results of Traditional treatment with fixed appliances.
There are two group:
phase Intervention/treatment Condition or disease
Not applicable Other:
Modified Twin-Block Appliance with Clear Plates.
Other:
Traditional Twin-Block Appliance. Skeletal class II Malocclusion
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| : Modified Twin-Block Appliance with Clear Plates. | Experimental | Clear plates technique A group of patients in which participants will be undergo to clear plates treatment will be applied to the upper and lower arch 17 hours daily Experimental : Modified Twin-Block Appliance with Clear Plates. |
|
| Traditional Twin-Block appliance | Experimental | Traditional Twin-Block appliance A group of patients in which participants will undergo to the Traditional Twin-Block appliance Treatment, appliances will be applied to the upper and lower arch 17 hours daily |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modified Twin-Block Appliance with Clear Plates. | Device | Clear plates technique A group of patients in which participants will be undergo to clear plates treatment will be applied to the upper and lower arch 17 hours daily |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the SNA angle[ | This angle the represents the position of the upper jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees. | : T0:1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group) |
| change in the SNB angle [ | This angle the represents the position of the lower jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees. | : T0:1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group) |
| change in the mandibular length | Amount of distance measured from the Co point to Gn point in the cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees. | T0: 1day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group) |
| change in overjet | Represents The distance between the most anterior point on the lower incisor to the most anterior point on the upper incisor in the cephalometric analysis. | T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group) |
| change in the vertical position of incisors | The vertical distance from the edge of the lower incisor to the mandibular plane. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fadi Jnaid | Contact | 988499015 | Drfadijnaid@gmail.com | |
| Fadi Jnaid | Contact | fadijnaid@hama-univ.edu.sy |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Rabab Alsabbagh,, DDS MSc PhD | Professor of Orthodontics, University of Hama Dental School, Hama, Syria. | Study Director |
| ANAS FAKHOURI | Student in Orthodontics, University of Hama Dental School, Hama. | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hama University | Recruiting | Hama | Syria |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8181550 | Background | Buschang PH, Stroud J, Alexander RG. Differences in dental arch morphology among adult females with untreated Class I and Class II malocclusion. Eur J Orthod. 1994 Feb;16(1):47-52. doi: 10.1093/ejo/16.1.47. | |
| 3422118 | Background | Clark WJ. The twin block technique. A functional orthopedic appliance system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 Jan;93(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90188-6. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008312 | Malocclusion, Angle Class II |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008310 | Malocclusion |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Traditional Twin-Block appliance | Device | Traditional Twin-Block appliance A group of patients in which participants will undergo to the Traditional Twin-Block appliance Treatment, appliances will be applied to the upper and lower arch 17 hours daily |
|
| : T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group) |
| 16679196 | Background | Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 May;129(5):599.e1-12; discussion e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.010. |
| 23201327 | Background | de Lira Ade L, de Moura WL, Artese F, Bittencourt MA, Nojima LI. Surgical prediction of skeletal and soft tissue changes in treatment of Class II. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Apr;41(3):198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Nov 30. |
| 19852643 | Background | Jung MH, Yang WS, Nahm DS. Maximum closing force of mentolabial muscles and type of malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):72-9. doi: 10.2319/020509-78.1. |
| 10629520 | Background | Trenouth MJ. Cephalometric evaluation of the Twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Jan;117(1):54-9. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70248-4. |
| 2220695 | Background | Tulloch JF, Medland W, Tuncay OC. Methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Oct;98(4):340-7. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81491-X. |