Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Hanmi Pharmaceutical Company Limited | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients who experienced neutropenia after receiving pegfilgrastim on day 1 of the first round are randomly assigned to either the control or experimental arm. Patients in the control arm continue pegfilgrastim injection on day 1 while patients in the experimental arm will receive pegfilgrastim injection on day 3 to see if changing the pegfilgrastim administration date from day 1 to day 3 starting from the second round of chemotherapy could reduce the incidence of neutropenia
The use of pegfilgrastim, which has a long-lasting effect in the human body, after myelosuppressive chemotherapy for solid tumors, including breast cancer, and blood cancers has led to a decrease in the incidence of neutropenia, including febrile neutropenia, and a reduction in medical costs by shortening hospitalization periods related to side effects of chemotherapy. During the early stages of drug development, there was controversy over the timing of pegfilgrastim administration, and attempts were made to administer it at various times, from the day of chemotherapy to the day of neutropenia began. However, based on several studies, it is now known that patients who receive pegfilgrastim on the day of chemotherapy or after 4 days of chemotherapy have a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia. Therefore, administering pegfilgrastim on day 1-3 after chemotherapy is ideal, but in reality, it is often difficult for patients to visit the hospital multiple times after chemotherapy, so many patients are discharged after receiving pegfilgrastim on day 1. The FDA and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines also recommend administration on day 1. It is known that patients who experience neutropenia after the first round of chemotherapy are more likely to experience it again in subsequent rounds. The investigators aimed to see whether changing the pegfilgrastim administration date from day 1 to day 3 starting from the second round of chemotherapy for patients who experienced neutropenia after receiving pegfilgrastim on day 1 of the first round can reduce the incidence of neutropenia.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Day1 Group | Active Comparator | Eflapegrastim administration on day 1 (24 hours after completion of chemotherapy) |
|
| Day 3 Group | Experimental | Eflapegrastim administration on day 3 (the third day after completion of chemotherapy |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eflapegrastim | Drug | long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence rate of severe neutropenia Incidence rate of severe neutropenia | The incidence rates of Grade 4 neutropenia (ANC < 500 respectively) | cycle 2-5 (21 days for each cycle), 105 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of severe neutropenia | number of consecutive days ANC lower than 500 | cycle 2-5 (21 days for each cycle), 105 days |
| Incidence rate of febrile neutropenia | Severe neutropenia with fever. Fever is defined as below
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief of Breast Center | Contact | 82519338719 | s8668s@hanmail.net |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Chang Wan Jeon, Ph.D | Surgical Oncologist | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good Gang-An Hospital | Recruiting | Busan | South Korea |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1378905 | Background | Meropol NJ, Miller LL, Korn EL, Braitman LE, MacDermott ML, Schuchter LM. Severe myelosuppression resulting from concurrent administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and cytotoxic chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992 Aug 5;84(15):1201-3. doi: 10.1093/jnci/84.15.1201. No abstract available. | |
| 8648378 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C583329 | eflapegrastim |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| cycle 2-5 (21 days for each cycle), 105 days |
| Incidence rate of neutropenia related death | Death related chemotherapy induced neutropenia sepsis | 1 year |
| Rowinsky EK, Grochow LB, Sartorius SE, Bowling MK, Kaufmann SH, Peereboom D, Donehower RC. Phase I and pharmacologic study of high doses of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Apr;14(4):1224-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.4.1224. |
| 28958157 | Background | Weycker D, Bensink M, Lonshteyn A, Doroff R, Chandler D. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia by day of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice from 2010 to 2015. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Dec;33(12):2107-2113. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1386858. Epub 2017 Oct 16. |
| 27734153 | Background | Weycker D, Li X, Tzivelekis S, Atwood M, Garcia J, Li Y, Reiner M, Lyman GH. Burden of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Hospitalizations in US Clinical Practice, by Use and Patterns of Prophylaxis with Colony-Stimulating Factor. Support Care Cancer. 2017 Feb;25(2):439-447. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3421-x. Epub 2016 Oct 12. |
| 28484882 | Background | Lyman GH, Allcott K, Garcia J, Stryker S, Li Y, Reiner MT, Weycker D. The effectiveness and safety of same-day versus next-day administration of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2017 Aug;25(8):2619-2629. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3703-y. Epub 2017 May 8. |
| Background | Kaufman PA, Paroly W, Rinaldi D. Randomized double blind phase 2 study evaluating same-day vs. next-day administration of pegfilgrastim with docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) in women with early stage and advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004;88:S59. |
| Background | Saven A, Schwartzberg L, Kaywin P, et al. Randomized, double-blind, phase 2, study evaluating same-day vs next-day administration of pegfilgrastim with R-CHOP in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients. J ClinOncol2006;24:7570. |
| 14647139 | Background | Leonard RC, Miles D, Thomas R, Nussey F; UK Breast Cancer Neutropenia Audit Group. Impact of neutropenia on delivering planned adjuvant chemotherapy: UK audit of primary breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2003 Dec 1;89(11):2062-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601279. |
| 11850858 | Background | Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP, Bow EJ, Brown AE, Calandra T, Feld R, Pizzo PA, Rolston KV, Shenep JL, Young LS. 2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Mar 15;34(6):730-51. doi: 10.1086/339215. Epub 2002 Feb 13. No abstract available. |
| 16249072 | Background | Tamura K. Clinical guidelines for the management of neutropenic patients with unexplained fever in Japan: validation by the Japan Febrile Neutropenia Study Group. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005 Dec;26 Suppl 2:S123-7; discussion S133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.08.001. Epub 2005 Oct 24. |
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |