Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The best way for dental professionals act using dialogue methods and individual approaches in daily clinical practice to change behavioral is still inconclusive. Thus, the objective will be evaluate the effect of using motivational interviewing as part of the treatment of periodontitis in order to increase the adherence of adults to adequate oral health behavior.
Patient-related approaches may show better results in treatment of periodontal diseases. The best way for the dental surgeon to act using these methods is still inconclusive. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of using motivational interviewing as part of the treatment of periodontitis in order to increase adult adherence to adequate oral health behavior. A randomized clinical trial, with a sample size of at least 72 subjects, >18 years of age and with at least 18 teeth, will be investigated. Individuals in the test group will receive a collaborative communicative approach, inspired by the motivational interview, while the control group will receive the information/instructions in a conventional approach. The efficacy variables for evaluating the pattern of self-control of periodontal infection will be the bleeding on probing (BoP), gingival index (GI, primary efficacy variable), the plaque index (PI) and patient-based outcomes will be assessed using quality of life questionnaires. Additionally, questionnaires will be applied to obtain sociodemographic, behavioral and self-perception of oral health data. Univariate and multivariate analyzes will be performed and conducted in the Statistical Products Service Solutions software (SPSS, version 25). Thus, it will be possible to assess whether brief oral health education interventions centered on the individual can be used by dental surgeons in order to effectively improve oral hygiene behaviors in adults, obtaining better clinical results and a better quality of life for patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interview Group (MIG) | Experimental | Participants assigned to this arm will complete three to five MI sessions |
|
| Conventional treatment group (CTG) | Active Comparator | Participants assigned to this arm will receive the conventional treatment |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interview Group (MIG) | Behavioral | Brief MI intervention with the conventional treatment |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The change in Bleeding on Probing to evaluate the improvement in hygiene behavior | BoP - Dichotomic response after probing the gingival sulcus. High values mean worst condition. | baseline, 15 days after supragingival treatment, 30 and 60 days after subgingival treatment and through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| The change in Plaque Index to evaluate the improvement in hygiene behavior | PI - Each of the 6 sites of the tooth is given a score from 0 to 3. High values mean worst condition. | baseline, 15 days after supragingival treatment, 30 and 60 days after subgingival treatment and through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| The change in Gingival index to evaluate the improvement in hygiene behavior | GI - Each of the 6 sites of the tooth is given a score from 0 to 3. High values mean worst condition. | baseline, 15 days after supragingival treatment, 30 and 60 days after subgingival treatment and through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Patient satisfaction assessed by the change in Quality of Life questionnaire | Quality of life - % of patients with better scores (lowest values) of quality of life. It can vary from 0 to 56. | baseline, 60 days after subgingival treatment and through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Patient perception assessed by the change in autoperception of oral health questionnaire | Autoperception of oral health - rate of patients with better condition of oral health perception. The answer options are: Great; Good; Regular; Bad; Terrible. 0-4 (lower scores mean better self-perception). | baseline, 60 days after subgingival treatment and through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Oral hygiene-related self-efficacy assessed by the oral hygiene-related selfefficacy (OHSE) questionnaire | Oral hygiene-related self-efficacy: % of patients with higher scores of self-efficacy. It ranges from 19 to 76, higher scores mean better self-efficacy. | 60 days after subgingival treatment and six months later |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Heitor Moreira | Santa Maria | Rio Grande do Sul | 97015-900 | Brazil |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010518 | Periodontitis |
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Conventional treatment group (CTG) | Procedure | Conventional treatment |
|