Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a subtype of epidermolysis bullosa (EB), an inherited skin condition that presents with blistering skin. The Spincare device, developed by Nanomedic, is the first portable tool that delivers a non-invasive, non-therapeutic electrospun, nanofibrous matrix dressing to wounds to promote healing. The aim of this study is to determine the suitability of this device in RDEB wounds and assess its wound healing properties, safety and tolerability.
Investigators will aim to recruit a mixture of adult and pediatric patient. However, the first patient that is recruited would be an adult to collect safety and efficacy data before enrolling pediatric patients.
Screening- Patients would be screened over the phone to assess if they meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thereafter a virtual meeting via a secure virtual platform is arranged for the patient to review the consent form and sign. Wounds will be assessed to see if they meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Day 0 - A full body wound examination will be performed by the investigator and target wound areas will be marked. All eligible wound sites will be randomized for matrix treatment versus standard of care wound care (at least 6 wounds, or 3 wound pairs). The matrix will be applied to randomized treatment wounds, along with a non-adhesive bandage as a protective layer. Reapplication of matrix treatment may be required depending on how well the matrix has propagated. At the time of matrix application, the investigator will score amount of wound burning, pain, or other adverse events. Non-treated wounds will have the patient's standard of care, non-adhesive bandage applied. Subjects and caregivers will be trained on how take photos. The aim is to capture photos of the wounds, pain and itch scores at least every 2 weeks. Surveys will be completed by the caregiver to see if they notice any difference in the wounds with the spray treatment. This will be completed together with the patient's pain and itch surveys.
Day 1 and optional Day 2- Clinic Visits: A wound examination will be performed in clinic. The investigator will assess the adherence of the matrix, and any adverse events (AEs). Day 2 visit may be necessary at the discretion of the investigators especially if any adverse events have occurred.
Months 1, 2, 3, 4 Visits: clinic attendance for patients with EB may be stressful and inconvenient due to their complex wound pattern and dressing changes. Keeping their safety and dignity as a priority the remaining visits as home visits are conducted with telehealth assessment. This will be done over a secure virtual platform or phone call whereby the assessors will be consulting remotely from a private Stanford based office room. The caregiver will apply the matrix to randomized, treated wounds (up to once a week application is allowed, the date and reason for reapplication is required)(additional interim visits/telehealth assessment and reapplication of matrix treatment may occur at Week 1, Week 2, Week 6, Week 10 and Week 14 or more frequently if deemed necessary). Patients will be asked to record the date each time the Spincare was applied. Photographs will be taken at those timepoints, and investigators will use Telehealth to monitor for healing and safety reporting (additional weekly photographs are encouraged). At the time of matrix application, the amount of wound burning, pain, or other adverse events will be scored Month 4 Telehealth/End of study Visit: The investigator will virtually assess wound healing compared to baseline photographs in the treated and control wounds. Digital photographs of the treatment and control wounds will be taken with a ruler by the caregiver and sent to the investigator. All wound photos will be reviewed via RedCAP. Wound swabs will be collected from treated and untreated wounds prior to spray treatment and at Month 2 and Month 4.
Participants may be offered the choice to complete surveys online and/or upload photos via Stanford RedCap.
Open-Label (Extension) Phase: After the completion of the 4-month randomized phase, patients will choose to enroll in an open Open-Label Phase for an additional 4 months. Investigators will conduct remote monitoring on a monthly basis to assess adverse events and wound healing. Participants will complete surveys regarding their pain and itch, offer updates on their medical history, and provide information about concurrent medications. No blood draws, wound cultures and in person visits will be required during the Open-Label Phase.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Arm | Experimental | A full body wound examination will be performed by the investigator and target wound areas will be marked. All eligible wound sites will be randomized for matrix treatment versus standard of care wound dressings (at least 6 wounds, or 3 wound pairs). The matrix will be applied to randomized treatment wounds, along with a non-adhesive bandage as a protective layer. |
|
| Open-label Arm (extension) | Other | Participants who are eligible and choose to participate, will be enrolled at the 4 month long optional Open-Label Phase. Participant will be allowed to treat previously randomized wounds (treated and control wounds) and new wounds, up to a max of 10 individuals wounds; there won't be control or randomized wounds. Participants might reapply up to once a week, and wound healing and safety will be assessed at the monthly visits. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spincare matrix | Device | The Spincare device, developed by Nanomedic, is the first portable tool that delivers a non-invasive, non-therapeutic electrospun, nanofibrous matrix dressing to wounds to promote healing. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Wounds With Greater Than 90% Wound Closure at 4 Months | The primary endpoint was comparison of the duration of wound closure of matrix-treated wounds vs control wounds measured as the number of wounds achieving greater than 90% wound closure within 4 months | Baseline to month 4 of the randomized phase |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Adverse Event Profile Characterization | Comparison of application site adverse events (burning, erythema, pain) between matrix-treated wounds vs control wounds after application. For this outcome, adverse events were collected per wound; events affecting the participant but not the wound are not included. | 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jean Y Tang, PhD | Stanford University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery Hall Stanford University | Redwood City | California | 94063 | United States |
De-identified coded data may be shared with collaborators, funding agency and presented at scientific meetings. Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification (text, tables, figures and appendices) would be shared.
Immediately following publication. No end date
Data will be presented at scientific meeting and in published material, Data may be available on sponsors website. Alternatively, proposals should be addressed to tangy@stanford.edu. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
Not provided
On Day 0, the investigator conducted an in-person full body skin examination and collected wound measurements to verify eligibility. The participant's wounds were assessed for signs of infection, and target wound areas were identified. Wounds that were actively infected with pus were excluded before randomization and the application of the matrix.
Patients aged 6-65 years with a clinical and/or genetic diagnosis of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa were screened over the phone. If eligible a virtual meeting was organized, and patients were asked to review and sign the informed consent form after which the wounds were assessed to determine suitability. This target population was chosen due to their large painful wounds usually resistant to conventional treatment and would benefit most from Spincare matrix treatment.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Matrix-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period) | A full body wound examination was performed by the investigator and target wound areas were marked. All eligible wound sites were randomized for matrix treatment versus standard of care wound dressings (at least 6 wounds, or 3 wound pairs). The matrix was applied to randomized treatment wounds, along with a non-adhesive bandage as a protective layer. |
| FG001 | Standard of Care-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period) | A full body wound examination was performed by the investigator and target wound areas were marked. All eligible wound sites were randomized for matrix treatment versus standard of care wound dressings (at least 6 wounds, or 3 wound pairs). The matrix was applied to randomized treatment wounds, along with a non-adhesive bandage as a protective layer. |
| FG002 | Open-label - Matrix Treatment | Participants from the randomized phase who were eligible and chose to participate, were enrolled at the 4 month long optional Open-Label Phase. Participant were allowed to treat previously randomized wounds (treated and control wounds) and new wounds, up to a max of 10 individuals wounds; there was no control or randomized wounds. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Period (4 Months) |
| |||||||||||||
| Open Label Period (4 Months) |
|
Patients aged 6 to 65 years old with a clinical and/or genetic diagnosis of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. This is a pilot study in 6 subjects where wounds were randomized 1:1 to matrix application or no treatment (control).
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Matrix-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period) | Wounds that were randomized to receive matrix application. |
| BG001 | Standard of Care-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period) | Wounds that were randomized to receive standard of care treatment. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Wounds With Greater Than 90% Wound Closure at 4 Months | The primary endpoint was comparison of the duration of wound closure of matrix-treated wounds vs control wounds measured as the number of wounds achieving greater than 90% wound closure within 4 months | Participants with month 4 data | Posted | Count of Units | Wounds | Baseline to month 4 of the randomized phase | Wounds | Wounds |
|
4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Matrix-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period) | Adverse events localized to the area of the body with wounds that were randomized to receive matrix application. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skin infection | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Cellulitis |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fever | General disorders | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Yuri Ikeda | Stanford University | 650-647-3485 | yurikeda@stanford.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 5, 2024 | May 8, 2025 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016108 | Epidermolysis Bullosa Dystrophica |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004820 | Epidermolysis Bullosa |
| D012868 | Skin Abnormalities |
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
Not provided
Not provided
Intra-patient randomization of wound pairs into control wounds vs matrix treated wounds, followed by an open-label (extension) phase without randomization
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Change From Baseline in Wound Pain Scale Score Assessment | Pain was assessed using the Wong-Baker Faces scale (prior to matrix application). The scale consists of six faces that range from 0 (no pain at all, favorable outcome) to 10 (worst pain imaginable, worst outcome). Participants rated each wound using this scale, and scores were summed and averaged for each time point, resulting in an overall score range of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). | months 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the randomized phase |
| Change in Wound Itch Scale Score Assessment | Wound itch scores were assessed using the Itch NRS (prior to matrix application). The Itch NRS is a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10. Participants rated each wound using this scale, and scores were summed and averaged for each time point, resulting in an overall score of 0 to 10 (higher scores correspond to more pain). | months 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the randomized phase |
| Number of Wounds That Reach >50% Healing From Baseline Per Investigator Assessment | Comparison of wounds that reach >50% healing from baseline in matrix vs control (standard-of-care treated) wounds, per clinician assessment. | months 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the randomized phase |
| Number of Wounds That Reach >70% Healing From Baseline Per Investigator Assessment | Comparison of wounds that reach >70% healing from baseline in matrix-treated vs control wounds, per clinician assessment. | months 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the randomized phase |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| BG002 | Open Label - Matrix-Treated | Wounds that were selected to receive matrix application, no randomization, no controls. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| wounds |
|
| Participants |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Full Range | years | Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants | Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Adverse Event Profile Characterization | Comparison of application site adverse events (burning, erythema, pain) between matrix-treated wounds vs control wounds after application. For this outcome, adverse events were collected per wound; events affecting the participant but not the wound are not included. | Posted | Count of Units | wounds | 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period | wounds | wounds |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Wound Pain Scale Score Assessment | Pain was assessed using the Wong-Baker Faces scale (prior to matrix application). The scale consists of six faces that range from 0 (no pain at all, favorable outcome) to 10 (worst pain imaginable, worst outcome). Participants rated each wound using this scale, and scores were summed and averaged for each time point, resulting in an overall score range of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). | Participants with available data at the respective time point | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | months 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the randomized phase | wounds | wounds |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Wound Itch Scale Score Assessment | Wound itch scores were assessed using the Itch NRS (prior to matrix application). The Itch NRS is a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10. Participants rated each wound using this scale, and scores were summed and averaged for each time point, resulting in an overall score of 0 to 10 (higher scores correspond to more pain). | Participants with available data at the respective time point | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | months 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the randomized phase | wounds | wounds |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Wounds That Reach >50% Healing From Baseline Per Investigator Assessment | Comparison of wounds that reach >50% healing from baseline in matrix vs control (standard-of-care treated) wounds, per clinician assessment. | Participants with available data at the respective time point | Posted | Number | Wounds | months 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the randomized phase | Wounds | Wounds |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Wounds That Reach >70% Healing From Baseline Per Investigator Assessment | Comparison of wounds that reach >70% healing from baseline in matrix-treated vs control wounds, per clinician assessment. | Number of wounds that reach >70% healing from baseline in matrix-treated vs control wounds | Posted | Number | Wounds | months 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the randomized phase | Wounds | Wounds |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 6 |
| 0 |
| 6 |
| 3 |
| 6 |
| EG001 | Standard of Care-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period) | Adverse events localized to the area of the body with wounds that were randomized to receive standard of care treatment. | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 6 |
| EG002 | Matrix-Treated Wounds (Open-Label Period) | Adverse events localized to the area of the body with wounds that were selected to receive matrix application, no randomization, no controls. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| EG003 | Systemic Adverse Events (Randomized Period) | All Adverse Events, including those that affected participants as a whole (systemic events) | 0 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| EG004 | Systemic Adverse Events (Open-Label Period) | All Adverse Events, including those that affected participants as a whole (systemic events) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| Mammary Gland Carcinoma | Reproductive system and breast disorders | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Invasive mammary gland neoplasm |
|
| Flu-like symptoms | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Unrelated to matrix treatment |
|
| Lymph node infection | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Unrelated to matrix treatment |
|
| Headache, migraine | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Unrelated to matrix treatment |
|
| Pruritis, requiring treatment | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Realted to matrix treatment |
|
| Pain of skin, requiring treatment | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Realted to matrix treatment |
|
| Bacterial colonization | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Unrelated to matrix treatment |
|
| Skin Infection | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Unrelated to matrix treatment |
|
| Toothache, chipped tooth | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Unrelated to matrix treatment |
|
| Allergic reaction, seasonal allergies | Immune system disorders | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Unrelated to matrix treatment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Unrelated to matrix treatment |
|
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Unrelated to matrix treatment |
|
| Premature menopause | Reproductive system and breast disorders | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Unrelated to matrix treatment |
|
| Vaginal discharge | Reproductive system and breast disorders | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Unrelated to matrix treatment |
|
| Bullous dermatitis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Unrelated to matrix treatment |
|
| Vision decreased, hyperopia | Eye disorders | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Unrelated to matrix treatment |
|
| Dental caries | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (v5.0) | Systematic Assessment | Unrelated to matrix treatment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D012873 | Skin Diseases, Genetic |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D003095 | Collagen Diseases |
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D012872 | Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous |
|
| Pain of Skin, requiring medication to treat |
|
| Bacterial Colonization |
|
| Skin Infection (non-serious) |
|
|
| Change at Month 1 |
|
|
| Change at Month 2 |
|
|
| Change at Month 3 |
|
|
| Change at Month 4 |
|
|
|
| Change at Month 1 |
|
|
| Change at Month 2 |
|
|
| Change at Month 3 |
|
|
| Change at Month 4 |
|
|
|
| Month 2 |
|
|
| Month 3 |
|
|
| Month 4 |
|
|
| t-test, 2 sided |
| 1 |
| Superiority |
| Wounds that reach >50% healing from baseline per investigator assessment at Month 3 | t-test, 2 sided | 1 | Superiority |
| Wounds that reach >50% healing from baseline per investigator assessment at Month 4 | t-test, 2 sided | 0.15 | Superiority |
|
| Month 2 |
|
|
| Month 3 |
|
|
| Month 4 |
|
|
| t-test, 2 sided |
| 1 |
| Superiority |
| Wounds that reach >70% healing from baseline per investigator assessment at Month 3 | t-test, 2 sided | 0.59 | Superiority |
| Wounds that reach >70% healing from baseline per investigator assessment at Month 4 | t-test, 2 sided | 0.09 | Superiority |