Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Zhongda Hospital | OTHER |
| Wannan Medical College Yijishan Hospital | OTHER |
| Wuhu City Second People's Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the role of the USTC diagnostic model in risk-adaptive strategies for biopsy decision-making in patients with low-risk suspected prostate cancer in order to reduce unnecessary biopsy. Based on the USTC diagnostic model (website: https://ustcprostatecancerprediction.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp/) and serum PSA levels, patients with low-risk suspected prostate cancer are enrolled and received active surveillance rather than biopsy. The main questions to be answered is:
• The safety and feasibility of conducting biopsy-free active monitoring in patients with low-risk suspected prostate cancer accessed by the USTC diagnostic model and serum PSA levels.
Participants will be required to undergo serum PSA testing every 3 months, mpMRI testing every 6 months, and reassessment of the probability of developing prostate cancer using the USTC model every 3 months. Patients who do not meet the inclusion criteria and are at increased risk will no longer receive active surveillance and will be advised to undergo biopsy. Dynamic changes in PI-RADS score and biopsy results will also be recorded.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with low-risk of prostate cancer based on USTC diagnostic model and serum PSA levels. | Patients with PSA between 4 to 10 ng/ml and USTC model predicted probability of cancer less than 0.05 (https://ustcprostatecancerprediction.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp/). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| active surveillance | Behavioral | active surveillance without prostate biopsy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| prostate cancer diagnostic free survival time | survival analysis by K-M curves and log-rank tests | through study completion, an average of 2 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| dynamic change of serum total PSA | dynamic change serum PSA level after active surveillance | every 3 months up to 2 years |
| dynamic change of PI-RADS score | dynamic change PI-RADS score after active surveillance |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
We select patients with low-risk suspected prostate cancer evaluated by USTC diagnostic model and serum PSA level. After meeting the inclusion criteria, follow-up surveys will be conducted.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tao Tao | Contact | 18856069828 | taotao_urology@ustc.edu.cn |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Tao Tao | The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC | Recruiting | Hefei | Anhui | 230001 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35143424 | Background | Xia C, Dong X, Li H, Cao M, Sun D, He S, Yang F, Yan X, Zhang S, Li N, Chen W. Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Feb 9;135(5):584-590. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108. | |
| 30185521 | Background | Ilic D, Djulbegovic M, Jung JH, Hwang EC, Zhou Q, Cleves A, Agoritsas T, Dahm P. Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2018 Sep 5;362:k3519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3519. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011471 | Prostatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D057832 | Watchful Waiting |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017063 | Outcome Assessment, Health Care |
| D010043 | Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D006298 | Health Services Administration |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| every 6 months up to 2 years |
| 33172724 | Background | Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Grummet J, Henry AM, van der Kwast TH, Lam TB, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason MD, Moris L, Oprea-Lager DE, van der Poel HG, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, Wiegel T, Willemse PM, Cornford P. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Nov 7. |
| 31714881 | Background | Duffy MJ. Biomarkers for prostate cancer: prostate-specific antigen and beyond. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Feb 25;58(3):326-339. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0693. |
| 33358543 | Background | Mazzone E, Stabile A, Pellegrino F, Basile G, Cignoli D, Cirulli GO, Sorce G, Barletta F, Scuderi S, Bravi CA, Cucchiara V, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Oct;4(5):697-713. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.004. Epub 2020 Dec 25. |
| 32444265 | Background | Sathianathen NJ, Omer A, Harriss E, Davies L, Kasivisvanathan V, Punwani S, Moore CM, Kastner C, Barrett T, Van Den Bergh RC, Eddy BA, Gleeson F, Macpherson R, Bryant RJ, Catto JWF, Murphy DG, Hamdy FC, Ahmed HU, Lamb AD. Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2020 Sep;78(3):402-414. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.048. Epub 2020 May 20. |
| 32124525 | Background | Berry B, Parry MG, Sujenthiran A, Nossiter J, Cowling TE, Aggarwal A, Cathcart P, Payne H, van der Meulen J, Clarke N. Comparison of complications after transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy: a national population-based study. BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):97-103. doi: 10.1111/bju.15039. Epub 2020 Apr 6. |
| 29847523 | Background | Hubner N, Shariat S, Remzi M. Prostate biopsy: guidelines and evidence. Curr Opin Urol. 2018 Jul;28(4):354-359. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000510. |
| 35127526 | Background | Tao T, Wang C, Liu W, Yuan L, Ge Q, Zhang L, He B, Wang L, Wang L, Xiang C, Wang H, Chen S, Xiao J. Construction and Validation of a Clinical Predictive Nomogram for Improving the Cancer Detection of Prostate Naive Biopsy Based on Chinese Multicenter Clinical Data. Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 21;11:811866. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.811866. eCollection 2021. |
| 33542230 | Result | Rebello RJ, Oing C, Knudsen KE, Loeb S, Johnson DC, Reiter RE, Gillessen S, Van der Kwast T, Bristow RG. Prostate cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Feb 4;7(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00243-0. |
| 29531107 | Result | Naji L, Randhawa H, Sohani Z, Dennis B, Lautenbach D, Kavanagh O, Bawor M, Banfield L, Profetto J. Digital Rectal Examination for Prostate Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Fam Med. 2018 Mar;16(2):149-154. doi: 10.1370/afm.2205. |
| D005832 |
| Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |