Efficacy of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Accelerated Theta Burst Stimulation in Treatment of Patients With Bipolar Depression and Suicidality
Efficacy of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Accelerated Theta Burst Stimulation in Treatment of Patients With Bipolar Depression and Suicidality
The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of left unilateral versus bilateral accelerated Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) in suicidal reduction and in reduction of severity of depressive symptoms in patients with bipolar depression.
Introduction:
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) therapy is a noninvasive neurostimulation treatment that has been adopted as a first-line treatment for pharmacotherapy-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) (Milev et al., 2016). rTMS induces electrical activity in the cortex using magnetic fields generated outside of the head. However, the evidence for antidepressant efficacy of rTMS in the treatment of bipolar depression is limited and derived primarily from small trials (Tavares et al., 2017, Dolberg et al., 2002, Nahas et al., 2003, Beyne et al., 2014, Tamas et al., 2007) and subsets of trials in major depression that included individuals with bipolar disorder (McGirr et al., 2016, Nguyen et al., 2021 ).
The proposed study will examine sequential bilateral versus Unilateral accelerated theta burst stimulation (aTBS) in treatment of patients with bipolar depression and suicidality.
Hypothesis:
We assume that bilateral accelerated TBS is superior than left unilateral accelerated TBS in treatment of suicidality while bilateral accelerated TBS is as effective as left unilateral accelerated TBS in treatment of depressive symptoms in bipolar patients.
Aim:
This study aims to reduce morbidity and mortality of bipolar depressive patients and to improve overall functioning.
Objectives:
Subjects and methods
Technical design:
Site of the study: psychiatric department TMS Unit at Zagazig University Hospital
Sample size:
Assuming that Percent of improvment of depression scale in bipolar patients ( response rate) in unilateral TMS was 47% and bilateral TMS was 80% (Kazemi et al.,2016) so at power of study 80% and confidence interval 95%, the sample size was calculated to be 58 cases ( 29 in each group) ( Open Epi )
Operational design
Participants :
All the participants who will be enrolled in the study will be subjected to the following:
The scales will be done at baseline and at the end of each day of five treatment days .
Administrative design
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
mbassiony@hotmail.com+2001005334253
alaaelsayedzayed@gmail.com+2001116277409