Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Brussel Medical Device Center (BMDC) | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Candy cane syndrome (CCS) is an adverse event (AE) from gastrectomy or gastric bypass and end-to-side anastomosis to a jejunal loop. It seems to be predominantly mechanical, the afferent blind loop enlarge and becomes preferential passage of food. This food accumulated in the blind loop increase luminal pressure, causing dilatation, early satiety, fullness, pain, reflux, regurgitation, postprandial vomiting, weight loss, and, ultimately, inability to eat, leading to cachexia.Up to now, main treatment is laparoscopic revision which is invasive. Adverse events related this surgical procedure occurred in 13,3% of cases and substantial improvement only in 73.9%.
A first clinical study with MAGUS including oesophageal diverticulum (n=2) and CCS (n=14) has been performed to assess safety and feasibility of this new device. MAGUS is an implantable device which is placed endoscopically and which, by using pressure necrosis, entailed the marsupialization of the blind loop in less than 30 days. Substantial improvement was observed in all patient and only 7,1% of patients experience an adverse event possibly related to the device. This study aim therefore to assess the safety and performance of the endoscopic treatment of CCS using a new medical device: MAGUS.
This will be a single-center, open-label prospective, safety and performance study on 51 patients with Candy Cane Syndrome (CCS). Patients will be followed for 12 months after the procedure, with an enrolment period of 3 years.
After the screening, the following data will be collected and examinations and tests performed : physical Exam, medical history including CCS cause and treatment(s) history, weight, Eckart and dysphagia score, Quality of Life questionnaire (SF 12 and GERD HRQL), Main symptom selection (Nausea, Vomiting/regurgitation or pain), nausea VAS, vomiting, regurgitation VAS, pain VAS, barium swallow X-ray or endoscopic assessment of Candy Cane. Follow-up visits will be performed at 14 days, 28 days, 3 months and 12 months post-procedure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventional | Experimental | The procedure consists in Medical Device (MAGUS) placement by endoscopy under general anesthesia with fluoroscopic control. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAGUS placement | Device | An upper endoscopy will be performed with the use of fluoroscopy under general anaesthesia with orotracheal intubation. The delivery system will be placed over a guidewire, under fluoroscopy. The main steps are the following:
Endoscopy and contrast injection will be performed before and after placement to ensure the correct positioning of the magnets. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety related to the number of adverse event | All adverse events device or procedure related will be captured | During procedure (operative day) ; at 14 days of follow-up ; at 28 days of follow-up ; at 3 months of follow-up |
| Performance on symptoms evolution | Evolution of pain will be assessed on a visual analog scale from 0 (= no symptom) to 10 (= severe symptom) | At baseline ; at 14 days of follow-up ; at 28 days of follow-up ; at 3 months of follow-up ; at 12 months of follow-up |
| Performance on symptoms evolution | Evolution of nausea will be assessed on a visual analog scale from 0 (= no symptom) to 10 (= severe symptom) | At baseline ; at 14 days of follow-up ; at 28 days of follow-up ; at 3 months of follow-up ; at 12 months of follow-up |
| Performance on symptoms evolution | Evolution of regurgitations/vomiting will be assessed on a visual analog scale from 0 (= no symptom) to 10 (= severe symptom) | At baseline ; at 14 days of follow-up ; at 28 days of follow-up ; at 3 months of follow-up ; at 12 months of follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety : adverse event at mid and long term | All adverse events will be reported | After 3 months of implantation |
| Safety : unplanned interventions | Number of unplanned interventions |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Refractory stenosis of the UGI proximal to the septum
Septum height smaller than 2 cm or higher than 8 cm
Coagulation disorders.
• Previous implantation of a magnetic-sensitive medical device (including active electronic implant, metallic stent, …).
Dysphagia related to motility disorder
Planned MRI in the following month (30 days) of intervention
Condition that could compromise patient safety
Patient who went through an abdominal surgery less than 8 weeks before implantation of the magnets
Patient pregnant, breastfeeding or incapacitated
Patient currently enrolled in another clinical trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pauline Van Ouytsel | Contact | 025556531 | pauline.vanouytsel@hubruxelles.be |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles - Hôpital Erasme | Recruiting | Brussels | 1070 | Belgium |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34979115 | Background | Rio-Tinto R, Huberland F, Van Ouytsel P, Delattre C, Dugardeyn S, Cauche N, Delchambre A, Deviere J, Blero D. Magnet and wire remodeling for the treatment of candy cane syndrome: first case series of a new approach (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jun;95(6):1247-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.12.027. Epub 2022 Jan 1. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Within the year following device placement |
| Efficacy : patient's satisfaction with the therapy | Scored by a visual analogue scale from 0 (= not satisfied at all) to 5 (=very satisfied) | At 3 and 12 months of follow-up |
| Efficacy : change in quality of life | Short-Form-12 score. A higher score indicates a better quality of life | At 28 days, 3 months and 12 months of follow-up |
| Efficacy : dysphagia evolution | Eckart score from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates more severe pathology. | At 14 and 28 days, and at 3 and 12 months of follow-up |
| Efficacy : dysphagia evolution | Dysphagia score from 1 to 5. A higher score indicates more severe pathology. | At 14 and 28 days, and at 3 and 12 months of follow-up |
| Efficacy : weight evolution | Weight measurment in kg | At 14 and 28 days, and at 3 and 12 months of follow-up |