Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35039/9/23 | Other Identifier | Tanta University |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Dulex Lab Company | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Introduction:
Lactoferrin has several uses due to its effects. It has anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, immunomodulatory, antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral effects. Its safety is proven by food and drug administration.
Aims:
The objective is to study the effect of lactoferrin on improving clinical outcomes in ICU patients compared to control and standard therapy, and also to evaluate its safety.
Patients and populations:
A sample of 660 patients (330 patients in both groups A, and B) who will be admitted to ICU departments in Mansoura university hospital will be used to represent the population in ICU.
Methods:
A sample of 660 participants was randomized 1:1 into two groups (group A (330 patients), and group B (330 patients)).
This study is a single blind, randomized controlled clinical trial. Randomization was performed by independent clinical pharmacists working in hospital ICU departments.
Introduction
1.1. Lactoferrin molecule
Lactoferrin (LF) is iron linking milk protein. LF helps to modulate iron levels in the body [1-3]. LF is a part of the milk whey protein. The colostrum (the first milk produced by mothers after delivery) has seven times more LF than mature milk [4]. LF is found in many organs like kidneys, lungs, gallbladder, pancreas, intestine, liver, prostate, and also in the body fluids like saliva, tears, sperm, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, bronchial secretions, vaginal discharge, synovial fluid, umbilical cord blood, blood plasma, and immune cells [1,2,4]. LF has many beneficial effects in the body. It has antioxidant, immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antiviral effects [5]. Figure 1: different effects of lactoferrin [5]
1.2. Lactoferrin as antioxidant molecule
The body is affected by several factors such as pathogens, environmental pollutants, and toxins. This leads to the development and accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the body which is known as oxidative stress. ROS can cause many diseases. LF can stop the harm induced by ROS [6, 7], and enhance the activity of endogenous antioxidant pathways [8].
LF acts as a neuroprotective agent in Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease [9]. It also protects against osteoporosis by inhibition of osteoblast activity and due to its antioxidant effect [10]. LF improves glucose metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus via enhancement of the insulin-mediating response [11] and prevents obesity due to imbalance in body fat metabolism [12]. It also reduces blood pressure in hypertension [13]. So, LF can act as anti-hyperglycemic, and anti-hypertensive agent.
1.3. Lactoferrin as antipathogenic and immunomodulating molecule LF has antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as it kills pathogens, and prevents the biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa [14]. LF also prevents viral, bacterial, fungal and protozoal gastrointestinal tract infections [15]. It enhances the treatment of Helicobacter pylori gastric infection [16], and also protects against endotoxemia, bacteremia, sepsis and necrotic enteritis after partial bowel resection [17] and in neonates [18]. LF possess an antiviral activity and enhances the effect of antiviral drugs [19].
It acts as antiviral agent by blocking the pathogen's surface receptors and prevents it from binding to the target cell, for example, its binding to angiotensin converting enzyme II receptors which used by SARS-CoV-2 to pass cell membrane and thus inhibit virus entry into the cell [20].
LF also has antifungal effect against dermatophytes and enhance the effect of antifungal drugs [21]. In addition, it has an antiparasitic effect in treatment of toxoplasmosis and malaria [22].
It also has an immunomodulating effect, stimulating the body to synthesize cytokines and chemokines as well as accelerating the maturation of the immune system cells [3, 23].
LF possesses also anti-inflammatory activity in non-infectious disorders such as allergies, arthritis, cancer [24] and inflammatory colitis [25]. Its anti-inflammatory effect is due to the inhibition of ROS to prevent lipid peroxidation by chelating iron. It also enhances the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10) and suppresses the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, IL-1b, and TNF-α). In addition, It can enter into mast cells and interact with the inflammatory proteases (chymase, cathepsin G, and tryptase) [26].
1.5. Lactoferrin for anemia of inflammation
LF treats inflammatory disorders by increasing ferroprotein production and decreasing IL-6 level to redistribute endogenous iron between blood and tissue. So, LF is used as therapy for anemia caused by inflammation [27].
1.6. Safety of lactoferrin use
The safety of LF is proved by the Food and Drug Administration. However, bovine LF, as an ingredient in cow's milk, may cause hypersensitivity, So, lactoferrin use has a risk of allergic reaction, and contraindicated in case of hypersensitivity to cow's milk proteins, and in lactose intolerance [28]. Other side effects of LF include stomach pain, vomiting, and constipation [29].
Aim of the study
The objective is to study the effect of lactoferrin on improving clinical outcomes in ICU patients, and also to evaluate its safety.
Methods
3.1. Study design
The research will be a single-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a drug. Randomization will be 1:1 and achieved by independent clinical pharmacists who are working in ICU departments of the hospital. The patients will be blinded for identification of treatment, and placebo groups. Allocation of patients into their groups will be made after checking for meeting inclusion and not meeting exclusion criteria within 24 hours of the admission to ICU. All patients will receive the standard of care at admission.
3.2. Patients and populations
A total of 660 patients who will be admitted to ICU departments in Mansoura University Hospital will represent the population in ICU.
3.3. Intervention
One group will receive a two sachet of 100 mg lactoferrin enterally (either orally or by Ryle tube) every 12 hours (400 mg daily) for 28 days plus the standard of care. another group will receive the standard of care only.
A sample of 660 patients (330 patients in both 2 groups (group A: lactoferrin and group B: standard group) who will be admitted to ICU departments in Mansoura university hospital will be used to represent the population in ICU. The standard group (B) will be divided into three subgroups of 110 patients in each. Subgroup B1 will receive standard antioxidant drug (Acetyl cysteine 600 mg / 12 hr) orally to be compared with lactoferrin A1 subgroup.
- Subgroup B2 will receive standard antimicrobial drugs to be compared with lactoferrin A3 subgroup.
- Subgroup B3 will receive standard anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory drug (dexamethasone I.V 8 mg / day) to be compared with lactoferrin A2 subgroup.
3.4. Outcomes and parameters
Primary outcomes:
• 28-day mortality (efficacy), and
• incidence of any allergic or hypersensitivity reactions (safety).
Secondary outcomes:
• the day of death,
• need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV),
• duration of need for oxygen therapy, and IMV,
• duration of ICU stay, and
• kidneys, and liver functions.
• Glasgow coma score (GCS) and
• sequential organ function assessment (SOFA) score [31].
• The changes in biochemical markers
Blood sample collection:
About 5 ml venous blood samples will be withdrawn by sterile venipuncture and centrifugated at 3000 rpm for 15 min, then sera will be kept frozen at 8 oC until analysis of • CBC
• Inflammatory marker (TNF-α)
• Oxidant marker (TAC)
• Liver functions
• Kidney functions In addition, arterial blood gases (ABG), vital signs, and Oxygen saturation were measured.Most of these parameters are measured in previous researches [32-39]
Subgroup analysis will be conducted in order to compare lactoferrin with other drugs with relevant activity as shown below:
1- A comparison between the antioxidant effect of lactoferrin vs standard antioxidant drug (Acetyl cysteine) indicated by Anti-oxidant marker (TAC)
2- A comparison between the adjuvant antimicrobial effect of lactoferrin vs standard antimicrobial drugs as indicated by the WBCs and its differential counts (neutrophils, lymphocytes) in case of infections.
3- A comparison between the anti-inflammatory effect of lactoferrin vs standard anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory drug (dexamethasone) as indicated by the inflammatory marker (TNF- α, CRP)
3.5 Statistical analysis and sample size
Statistical analysis:
Per-protocol strategy will be used in this study. Categorical variables will be presented as proportion and percent. Continuous variables will be presented as mean (standard deviation) if normally distributed or as a median (IQR) or (25th-75th percentile) for non-normally distributed data Mann-Whitney test, t-test or Chi-square test will be used to compare baseline characteristics and outcomes between the two groups. In comparison between the two groups, Chi-square test will be used to compare proportions for non-parametric data (nominal or categorical). Mann-Whitney test will be used to compare medians for non- normally distributed continuous parametric data. While t-test will be used only to compare means in case normally distributed continuous parametric. So, distributions of continuous data will be tested in order to know the correct test to be used in comparison of parametric data between the two groups. ANOVA test will be used in case of comparison between more than 2 groups (as in case of comparison of antioxidant therapies).
Investigators will report the 95% confidence interval and the P-value for our statistical tests with level of statistical significance will be p-value < 0.05.
Regression analysis will be performed, if there is a statistically significant differences between the baseline characteristics including age, gender, No. of comorbidities (DM, hypertension (HTN), ischemic heart disease (IHD), atrial fibrillation (AF), COPD) in order to exclude the effect of these confounding variables on the study outcomes Investigators will compare the 28-day all-cause mortality rate, incidence of hypersensitivity reactions, and need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) using the Chi-square test. while t-test will be used to compare the day of death, duration of need for oxygen therapy and IMV, and duration of ICU stay, and all parameter measured in the study if they will be normally distributed, but if they will be non-normally distributed, Mann-Whitney test will be used instead.
. Statistical analysis will be achieved with SPSS software, version 26.
Sample size:
The power of trial will depend on the primary outcome (28-day mortality). The proportion of ICU Population to all hospital population is about 25% A total sample sizes of 634 patients would achieve at least 80 % (0.8) power to detect a risk difference of 0.2 (20%) in the 28-day all-cause mortality (primary outcome) between alternative hypothesis and the null hypothesis (proportions of two groups are 0.5) with a significance level (α) of 0.05 and 95% confidence level proportion in Clincalc.com calculator [62]. To compensate for the estimated loss-to-follow-up and increase the study power more than 80%, Investigators will increase the sample size in both groups to be 660 patients (330 in each study group).
The mortality data will be estimated from the average mortality in January, February, and March 2025 at the Mansoura University Hospital ICU departments among all hospitalized patients. Mortality rate is found to be about 720 cases in these 3 months (240 cases / month) in ICU patients receiving the standard of care. The online system has been used to obtain mortality rate in these three months [32-39]. The hypothesis is that LF will decrease mortality by 20% so mortality rate will be decreased from 240 to 192 per month.
4. Data Quality and Safety
Investigators will collect the data from hospital system directly into an excel sheet, Patient confidentiality will be kept before, during and after the study. Patients who will be discharged before 28 days of hospital stay, will be communicated at day 28 in order to know mortality at day 28.
5. Publishing the study results and funding
Due to size limitations in publishing this big research as one paper in one journal. Investigators aim to divide this research into five papers and publish these papers in peer-reviewed journals (5 stage publications).
Funding There is no funding source for this study
Conflict of interest The investigators declare no relevant conflict of interest
6. Ethical Considerations
Ethical approval will be taken from
Institutional research board (IRB), faculty of medicine, Mansoura University,
Research ethics committee, faculty of pharmacy, Tanta University,
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lactoferrin | Experimental | Lactoferrin 100 mg sachets with a dose of 200 mg (2 sachets) orally twice daily (400 mg per day) In addition to standard of care |
|
| Standard | Active Comparator | Subgroup B1 will receive standard antioxidant drug (Acetyl cysteine 600 mg / 12 hr) orally to be compared with lactoferrin A1 subgroup.
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lactoferrin | Drug | antioxidant, immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial effect |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 28-days mortality rate | Dead or alive | 28 days |
| Number of Participants With any allergic or hypersensitivity reactions | incidence of any allergic or hypersensitivity reactions | up to 60 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Day of death | Death day | up to 60 days |
| Incidence of need for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation | yes or no | up to 60 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) on day 3 | minimum 0 to maximum 15, higher scores mean better outcomes | day 3 |
| Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) on day 7 | minimum 0 to maximum 15, higher scores mean better outcomes |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ahmed H Hassan, Researcher | Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura National University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mansoura University hospital | Al Mansurah | El-dakhlia | 35511 | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29533543 | Background | Artym J, Kocieba M, Zaczynska E, Adamik B, Kubler A, Zimecki M, Kruzel M. Immunomodulatory properties of human recombinant lactoferrin in mice: Implications for therapeutic use in humans. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018 Mar;27(3):391-399. doi: 10.17219/acem/68440. | |
| Background | Hegazy, S.K., Hassan, A.H. The effect of combination treatment with casirivimab and imdevimab versus standard antiviral therapy on clinical outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Discov Med 1, 71 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44337-024-00045-3 | ||
| 22292559 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Study data | View source |
| ID | Type | URL | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individual Participant Data Set | View IPD |
After the end and publication of the study
After the end and publication of the study
all will be accessible
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016638 | Critical Illness |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007781 | Lactoferrin |
| D003907 | Dexamethasone |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012697 | Serine Endopeptidases |
| D010450 | Endopeptidases |
| D010447 | Peptide Hydrolases |
| D006867 | Hydrolases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Antioxidant therapies |
| Drug |
Acetyl cysteine 600 mg / 12 hr |
|
| Dexamethasone | Drug | dexamethasone I.V 8 mg / day |
|
| Antibacterial therapies | Drug | Antibacterial drugs in their approved doses |
|
| Oxygen Support Duration | Duration of need for Oxygen Support | up to 60 days |
| Duration of ICU stay | ICU stay duration | up to 60 days |
| White blood cells (WBCs) counts on day 3 | Leukocytes count on day 3 | day 3 |
| White blood cells (WBCs) counts on day 7 | Leukocytes count on day 7 | day 7 |
| White blood cells (WBCs) counts on day 14 | Leukocytes count on day 14 | day 14 |
| White blood cells (WBCs) counts on day 28 | Leukocytes count on day 28 | day 28 |
| Neutrophils counts on day 3 | Neutrophils counts on day 3 | day 3 |
| Neutrophils counts on day 7 | Neutrophils counts on day 7 | day 7 |
| Neutrophils counts on day 14 | Neutrophils counts on day 14 | day 14 |
| Neutrophils counts on day 28 | Neutrophils counts on day 28 | day 28 |
| Hemoglobin concentration on day 3 | Hemoglobin concentration on day 3 | day 3 |
| Hemoglobin concentration on day 7 | Hemoglobin concentration on day 7 | day 7 |
| Hemoglobin concentration on day 14 | Hemoglobin concentration on day 14 | day 14 |
| Hemoglobin concentration on day 28 | Hemoglobin concentration on day 28 | day 28 |
| Hematocrit concentration on day 3 | Hematocrit concentration on day 3 | day 3 |
| Hematocrit concentration on day 7 | Hematocrit concentration on day 7 | day 7 |
| Hematocrit concentration on day 14 | Hematocrit concentration on day 14 | day 14 |
| Hematocrit concentration on day 28 | Hematocrit concentration on day 28 | day 28 |
| Platelets counts on day 3 | Platelets counts on day 3 | day 3 |
| Platelets counts on day 7 | Platelets counts on day 7 | day 7 |
| Platelets counts on day 14 | Platelets counts on day 14 | day 14 |
| Platelets counts on day 28 | Platelets counts on day 28 | day 28 |
| Sequential Organ Function Assessment (SOFA) Score on day 3 | minimum 0 to maximum 24, higher scores mean worse outcomes | day 3 |
| Sequential Organ Function Assessment (SOFA) Score on day 7 | minimum 0 to maximum 24, higher scores mean worse outcomes | day 7 |
| Sequential Organ Function Assessment (SOFA) Score on day 14 | minimum 0 to maximum 24, higher scores mean worse outcomes | day 14 |
| Sequential Organ Function Assessment (SOFA) Score on day 28 | minimum 0 to maximum 24, higher scores mean worse outcomes | day 28 |
| Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) concentration on day 3 | Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) concentration on day 3 | day 3 |
| Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) concentration on day 7 | Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) concentration on day 7 | day 7 |
| Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) concentration on day 14 | Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) concentration on day 14 | day 14 |
| Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) concentration on day 28 | Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) concentration on day 28 | day 28 |
| Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) concentration on day 3 | Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) concentration on day 3 | day 3 |
| Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) concentration on day 7 | Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) concentration on day 7 | day 7 |
| Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) concentration on day 14 | Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) concentration on day 14 | day 14 |
| Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) concentration on day 28 | Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) concentration on day 28 | day 28 |
| Albumin concentration on day 3 | Albumin concentration on day 3 | day 3 |
| Albumin concentration on day 7 | Albumin concentration on day 7 | day 7 |
| Albumin concentration on day 14 | Albumin concentration on day 14 | day 14 |
| Albumin concentration on day 28 | Albumin concentration on day 28 | day 28 |
| Serum Creatinine (S.Cr) concentration on day 3 | Serum Creatinine (S.Cr) concentration on day 3 | day 3 |
| Serum Creatinine (S.Cr) concentration on day 7 | Serum Creatinine (S.Cr) concentration on day 7 | day 7 |
| Serum Creatinine (S.Cr) concentration on day 14 | Serum Creatinine (S.Cr) concentration on day 14 | day 14 |
| Serum Creatinine (S.Cr) concentration on day 28 | Serum Creatinine (S.Cr) concentration on day 28 | day 28 |
| Creatinine clearance (Cr.Cl) rate on day 3 | Creatinine clearance (Cr.Cl) rate on day 3 | day 3 |
| Creatinine clearance (Cr.Cl) rate on day 7 | Creatinine clearance (Cr.Cl) rate on day 7 | day 7 |
| Creatinine clearance (Cr.Cl) rate on day 14 | Creatinine clearance (Cr.Cl) rate on day 14 | day 3 |
| Creatinine clearance (Cr.Cl) rate on day 28 | Creatinine clearance (Cr.Cl) rate on day 28 | day 28 |
| Duration of hospitalization | Duration of hospitalization | up to 60 days |
| Antioxidant marker | Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) | day 3 |
| Antioxidant marker | Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) | day 7 |
| Antioxidant marker | Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) | day 14 |
| Antioxidant marker | Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) | day 28 |
| Inflammatory marker - TNF- alpha | TNF-alpha | day 3 |
| Inflammatory marker - TNF- alpha | TNF-alpha | day 7 |
| Inflammatory marker - TNF- alpha | TNF-alpha | day 14 |
| Inflammatory marker - TNF- alpha | TNF- alpha | day 28 |
| Inflammatory marker - CRP | CRP | day 3 |
| Inflammatory marker - CRP | CRP | day 7 |
| Inflammatory marker - CRP | CRP | day 14 |
| Inflammatory marker - CRP | CRP | day 28 |
| day 7 |
| Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) on day 14 | minimum 0 to maximum 15, higher scores mean better outcomes | day 14 |
| Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) on day 28 | minimum 0 to maximum 15, higher scores mean better outcomes | day 28 |
| Arterial Oxygen Pressure / Fraction Inspired of Oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) on day 3 | Arterial Oxygen Pressure / Fraction Inspired of Oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) on day 3 | day 3 |
| Arterial Oxygen Pressure / Fraction Inspired of Oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) on day 7 | Arterial Oxygen Pressure / Fraction Inspired of Oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) on day 7 | day 7 |
| Arterial Oxygen Pressure / Fraction Inspired of Oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) on day 14 | Arterial Oxygen Pressure / Fraction Inspired of Oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) on day 14 | day 14 |
| Arterial Oxygen Pressure / Fraction Inspired of Oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) on day 28 | Arterial Oxygen Pressure / Fraction Inspired of Oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) on day 28 | day 28 |
| Oxygen saturation on day 3 | Oxygen saturation at day 3 | day 3 |
| Oxygen saturation on day 7 | Oxygen saturation at day 7 | day 7 |
| Oxygen saturation on day 14 | Oxygen saturation at day 14 | day 14 |
| Oxygen saturation on day 28 | Oxygen saturation at day 28 | day 28 |
| Background |
| Baker HM, Baker EN. A structural perspective on lactoferrin function. Biochem Cell Biol. 2012 Jun;90(3):320-8. doi: 10.1139/o11-071. Epub 2012 Jan 31. |
| 18183929 | Background | Legrand D, Pierce A, Elass E, Carpentier M, Mariller C, Mazurier J. Lactoferrin structure and functions. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;606:163-94. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-74087-4_6. |
| 24786230 | Background | Siqueiros-Cendon T, Arevalo-Gallegos S, Iglesias-Figueroa BF, Garcia-Montoya IA, Salazar-Martinez J, Rascon-Cruz Q. Immunomodulatory effects of lactoferrin. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2014 May;35(5):557-66. doi: 10.1038/aps.2013.200. |
| 34071527 | Background | Bukowska-Osko I, Popiel M, Kowalczyk P. The Immunological Role of the Placenta in SARS-CoV-2 Infection-Viral Transmission, Immune Regulation, and Lactoferrin Activity. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 May 28;22(11):5799. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115799. |
| 35566292 | Background | Kowalczyk P, Kaczynska K, Kleczkowska P, Bukowska-Osko I, Kramkowski K, Sulejczak D. The Lactoferrin Phenomenon-A Miracle Molecule. Molecules. 2022 May 4;27(9):2941. doi: 10.3390/molecules27092941. |
| 23738047 | Background | Poljsak B, Suput D, Milisav I. Achieving the balance between ROS and antioxidants: when to use the synthetic antioxidants. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2013;2013:956792. doi: 10.1155/2013/956792. Epub 2013 Apr 29. |
| 34948180 | Background | Kowalczyk P, Sulejczak D, Kleczkowska P, Bukowska-Osko I, Kucia M, Popiel M, Wietrak E, Kramkowski K, Wrzosek K, Kaczynska K. Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress-A Causative Factor and Therapeutic Target in Many Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Dec 13;22(24):13384. doi: 10.3390/ijms222413384. |
| Background | Parekattil S.J., Esteves S.C., Agarwal A. Male Infertility. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2020. Harmful Effects of Antioxidant Therapy |
| 31985470 | Background | Abdelhamid M, Jung CG, Zhou C, Abdullah M, Nakano M, Wakabayashi H, Abe F, Michikawa M. Dietary Lactoferrin Supplementation Prevents Memory Impairment and Reduces Amyloid-beta Generation in J20 Mice. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;74(1):245-259. doi: 10.3233/JAD-191181. |
| 32197844 | Background | Shi P, Fan F, Chen H, Xu Z, Cheng S, Lu W, Du M. A bovine lactoferrin-derived peptide induced osteogenesis via regulation of osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. J Dairy Sci. 2020 May;103(5):3950-3960. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17425. Epub 2020 Mar 18. |
| 19584176 | Background | Moreno-Navarrete JM, Ortega FJ, Bassols J, Ricart W, Fernandez-Real JM. Decreased circulating lactoferrin in insulin resistance and altered glucose tolerance as a possible marker of neutrophil dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Oct;94(10):4036-44. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-0215. Epub 2009 Jul 7. |
| 32352945 | Background | Kaczmarek N, Jamka M, Walkowiak J. [An association of selected polymorphisms of the lactoferrin gene and genes for lactoferrin receptors in the prevalence of metabolic disorders in obese subjects]. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2020 Apr 22;48(284):120-123. Polish. |
| 23364610 | Background | Ikeda Y, Tajima S, Izawa-Ishizawa Y, Kihira Y, Ishizawa K, Yoshida S, Aihara K, Tsuchiya K, Tamaki T. Bovine milk-derived lactoferrin exerts proangiogenic effects in an Src-Akt-eNOS-dependent manner in response to ischemia. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2013 May;61(5):423-9. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e318287d526. |
| 18573312 | Background | Jenssen H, Hancock RE. Antimicrobial properties of lactoferrin. Biochimie. 2009 Jan;91(1):19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2008.05.015. Epub 2008 Jun 5. |
| 24018446 | Background | Artym J, Zimecki M. Milk-derived proteins and peptides in clinical trials. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2013 Aug 6;67:800-16. doi: 10.5604/17322693.1061635. |
| 23114016 | Background | Tolone S, Pellino V, Vitaliti G, Lanzafame A, Tolone C. Evaluation of Helicobacter Pylori eradication in pediatric patients by triple therapy plus lactoferrin and probiotics compared to triple therapy alone. Ital J Pediatr. 2012 Oct 31;38:63. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-38-63. |
| 24830343 | Background | Wu J, Chen J, Wu W, Shi J, Zhong Y, van Tol EA, Tang Q, Cai W. Enteral supplementation of bovine lactoferrin improves gut barrier function in rats after massive bowel resection. Br J Nutr. 2014 Aug 28;112(4):486-92. doi: 10.1017/S000711451400107X. Epub 2014 May 15. |
| 27234409 | Background | Sherman MP, Sherman J, Arcinue R, Niklas V. Randomized Control Trial of Human Recombinant Lactoferrin: A Substudy Reveals Effects on the Fecal Microbiome of Very Low Birth Weight Infants. J Pediatr. 2016 Jun;173 Suppl:S37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.02.074. |
| 21847071 | Background | Berlutti F, Pantanella F, Natalizi T, Frioni A, Paesano R, Polimeni A, Valenti P. Antiviral properties of lactoferrin--a natural immunity molecule. Molecules. 2011 Aug 16;16(8):6992-7018. doi: 10.3390/molecules16086992. |
| 33659275 | Background | Miotto M, Di Rienzo L, Bo L, Boffi A, Ruocco G, Milanetti E. Molecular Mechanisms Behind Anti SARS-CoV-2 Action of Lactoferrin. Front Mol Biosci. 2021 Feb 15;8:607443. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.607443. eCollection 2021. |
| 22184648 | Background | Manzoni P, Stolfi I, Messner H, Cattani S, Laforgia N, Romeo MG, Bollani L, Rinaldi M, Gallo E, Quercia M, Maule M, Mostert M, Decembrino L, Magaldi R, Mosca F, Vagnarelli F, Memo L, Betta PM, Stronati M, Farina D; Italian Task Force for the Study and Prevention of Neonatal Fungal Infections-the Italian Society of Neonatology. Bovine lactoferrin prevents invasive fungal infections in very low birth weight infants: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2012 Jan;129(1):116-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0279. Epub 2011 Dec 19. |
| Background | León-Sicairos N., Ordaz-Pichardo C., Carrero J.C., de la Garza M. Natural Remedies in the Fight Against Parasites. Intechopen; London, UK: 2017. Lactoferrin in the Battle against Intestinal Parasites: A Review. |
| 16936799 | Background | Yamauchi K, Wakabayashi H, Shin K, Takase M. Bovine lactoferrin: benefits and mechanism of action against infections. Biochem Cell Biol. 2006 Jun;84(3):291-6. doi: 10.1139/o06-054. |
| 28165294 | Background | Alexander DB, Iigo M, Abdelgied M, Ozeki K, Tanida S, Joh T, Takahashi S, Tsuda H. Bovine lactoferrin and Crohn's disease: a case study. Biochem Cell Biol. 2017 Feb;95(1):133-141. doi: 10.1139/bcb-2016-0107. Epub 2016 Nov 30. |
| 12623133 | Background | He S, McEuen AR, Blewett SA, Li P, Buckley MG, Leufkens P, Walls AF. The inhibition of mast cell activation by neutrophil lactoferrin: uptake by mast cells and interaction with tryptase, chymase and cathepsin G. Biochem Pharmacol. 2003 Mar 15;65(6):1007-15. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(02)01651-9. |
| 29619653 | Background | Wakabayashi H, Yamauchi K, Abe F. Quality control of commercial bovine lactoferrin. Biometals. 2018 Jun;31(3):313-319. doi: 10.1007/s10534-018-0098-2. Epub 2018 Apr 4. |
| 19639462 | Background | Nappi C, Tommaselli GA, Morra I, Massaro M, Formisano C, Di Carlo C. Efficacy and tolerability of oral bovine lactoferrin compared to ferrous sulfate in pregnant women with iron deficiency anemia: a prospective controlled randomized study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(9):1031-5. doi: 10.1080/00016340903117994. |
| 32738305 | Background | Chang R, Ng TB, Sun WZ. Lactoferrin as potential preventative and adjunct treatment for COVID-19. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Sep;56(3):106118. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106118. Epub 2020 Jul 30. |
| 9824069 | Background | Vincent JL, de Mendonca A, Cantraine F, Moreno R, Takala J, Suter PM, Sprung CL, Colardyn F, Blecher S. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on "sepsis-related problems" of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 1998 Nov;26(11):1793-800. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199811000-00016. |
| 38389078 | Background | Eltahan NH, Elsawy NH, Abdelaaty KM, Elhamaky AS, Hassan AH, Emara MM. Atorvastatin for reduction of 28-day mortality in severe and critical COVID-19 patients: a randomized controlled trial. Respir Res. 2024 Feb 22;25(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02732-2. |
| 37220480 | Background | Hegazy SK, Tharwat S, Hassan AH. Clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of casirivimab & imdevimab, remdesivir, and favipravir in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. J Clin Virol Plus. 2023 Jun;3(2):100151. doi: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2023.100151. Epub 2023 May 10. |
| 37588660 | Background | Hegazy SK, Tharwat S, Hassan AH. Study to compare the effect of casirivimab and imdevimab, remdesivir, and favipiravir on progression and multi-organ function of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Open Med (Wars). 2023 Aug 9;18(1):20230768. doi: 10.1515/med-2023-0768. eCollection 2023. |
| 37731581 | Background | Hegazy SK, Tharwat S, Hassan AH. Comparing the efficacy of regen-cov, remdesivir, and favipiravir in reducing invasive mechanical ventilation need in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. World J Clin Cases. 2023 Sep 16;11(26):6105-6121. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i26.6105. |
| Background | Hegazy SK, Hassan AH. Comparing the Efficacy of Remdesivir, Favipiravir, and Casirivimab and Imdevimab on Duration of Hospitalization and ICU Stay of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients. Life Science Research Communications; 2024; 1(1),21-30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5530/lsrc.1.1.7 |
| Background | Hassan AH, Hegazy SK, Radwan ST. Clinical Study to Evaluate the Possible Efficacy and Safety of Antibodies Combination (casirivimab and imdevimab) versus standard antiviral therapy as antiviral agent against Corona virus 2 infection in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. medRxiv. 2022. (preprint). Available from: doi: 10.1101/2022.08.20.22279020 |
| Background | Hassan AH, Hegazy SK, Radwan ST. Clinical Study to Evaluate the Possible Efficacy and Safety of Antibodies Combination (casirivimab and imdevimab) versus standard antiviral therapy as antiviral agent against Corona virus 2 infection in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Research Square; 2023. Available from: doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1991618/v2. |
| D004798 |
| Enzymes |
| D045762 | Enzymes and Coenzymes |
| D057057 | Serine Proteases |
| D006023 | Glycoproteins |
| D006001 | Glycoconjugates |
| D002241 | Carbohydrates |
| D061250 | Transferrins |
| D033862 | Iron-Binding Proteins |
| D002352 | Carrier Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D007782 | Lactoglobulins |
| D000067816 | Whey Proteins |
| D008894 | Milk Proteins |
| D000080224 | Animal Proteins, Dietary |
| D004044 | Dietary Proteins |
| D005916 | Globulins |
| D008667 | Metalloproteins |
| D011246 | Pregnadienetriols |
| D011245 | Pregnadienes |
| D011278 | Pregnanes |
| D013256 | Steroids |
| D000072473 | Fused-Ring Compounds |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
| D013259 | Steroids, Fluorinated |