Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this observational study is to compare the strength of the incorporation according to the type of prosthesis (aesthetic, mechanical, myoelectric) with the experience the illusion of the rubber hand. The investigators will replace is the rubber by the patient's prothesis. The population will be people with upper arm amputation above the hand and they will be their own comparation.
Participants will do the the experience the illusion of the rubber hand in asynchronic and synchronic way and to answer questionnaries.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upper limb amputee population | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modified illusion of the rubber (syncrhone) | Other | The residual limb of the patient will be hide for the patient. The prothesis and the other hand of the patient will be visible. The investigators are going to touch the residual limb and the prothesis at the same time (synchrone) during at least 2 min. The investigators will ask to the patient to point where they felt the touching spot on a tray with measurement grid and to asnwer to the pre-prepared questionnaire. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proprioceptive drift | Before and after each intervention, we are going to ask to the patient to point where we touch the residual limb on a graduated board. | Immediately after the intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Appropriate affect | After each intervention, patient will answering to a questionnary about appropriation with their past as comparaison. | Immediately after the intervention |
| Influence of patient's characteristic |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anton KANIEWSKI, Master | Contact | +33 1 45 10 80 97 | a.kaniewski@irma-valenton.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institut Robert Merle d'Aubigné | Recruiting | Valenton | 94460 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9486643 | Background | Botvinick M, Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature. 1998 Feb 19;391(6669):756. doi: 10.1038/35784. No abstract available. | |
| 19074189 | Background | Ehrsson HH, Rosen B, Stockselius A, Ragno C, Kohler P, Lundborg G. Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own. Brain. 2008 Dec;131(Pt 12):3443-52. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn297. Epub 2008 Dec 11. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Modified illusion of the rubber (asynchrone) | Other | The residual limb of the patient will be hide for the patient. The prothesis and the other hand of the patient will be visible. The investigators are going to touch the residual limb and the prothesis not at the same time (asynchrone) during at least 2 min. The investigators will ask to the patient to point where they felt the touching spot on a tray with measurement grid and to asnwer to the pre-prepared questionnaire. |
|
Compare patient's characteristic with other outome : amputation level, time since amputation, time using the prothestics
| During the patient's inclusion / Baseline |