Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the applicability and effectiveness of an aquatic rehabilitation training program with a conventional land-based rehabilitation program in terms of lower extremity biomechanics and knee function in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) patients. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Participants were randomly divided into an aquatic rehabilitation group (AR) and a land-based rehabilitation group (LR), and each group performed 70-90 minutes of training per session for a total of 6 sessions. This included warm-up activities, mobility training, strength training, functional exercises, and finishing activities. Each training session was conducted 1-2 days apart, 2-3 sessions per week, and the training was completed within 2-3 weeks.
The experimental procedures of this study included collecting basic information about the subjects (age, height, weight, injury history, and surgery) and assessing muscle properties, degree of knee swelling, thigh circumference, knee flexion mobility, balance ability, gait, and the IKDC2000 score. Post-intervention testing was performed with the same testing procedures as the pre-intervention testing. The IKDC score was assessed again for one year after the intervention.
The results of all outcomes measured before and after the intervention were analyzed and calculated using IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0. The data were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For data conforming to a normal distribution, results are expressed as mean (Mean) and standard deviation (SD). An independent-samples t-test was used to compare whether there was a statistically significant difference in baseline and post-intervention values between the two intervention groups, and a paired-samples t-test was used to test whether there was a statistically significant difference before and after the intervention within each group. For data that did not conform to a normal distribution, results are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR). The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare baseline and post-intervention values between the two intervention groups, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to examine whether there was a statistically significant difference before and after the intervention within each group. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05, and P < 0.01 was considered highly significant.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aquatic Rehabilitation | Experimental | Each group performed 70-90 minutes per session for a total of 6 interventions, all of which included warm-up activities, mobility training, strength training, functional exercise, and finishing activities. Each training was conducted 1-2 days apart, 2-3 times per week, and the training was completed within 2-3 weeks. |
|
| Land-based Rehabilitation | Experimental | Each group performed 70-90 minutes per session for a total of 6 interventions, all of which included warm-up activities, mobility training, strength training, functional exercise, and finishing activities. Each training was conducted 1-2 days apart, 2-3 times per week, and the training was completed within 2-3 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aquatic Rehabilitation | Other | Reviewing the existing literature studies and related books, and combining the post-operative rehabilitation process of ACLR with the opinions of experts from the China Aquatic Rehabilitation Association, the Aquatic rehabilitation program of this study was designed. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Stride Length Change | Kinovea 0.8.15 software was used for gait video calibration to analyze and calculate the stride length, which is the longitudinal linear distance between two consecutive heel touches on the same side of the foot during walking. The time, place, and testers of the test were kept consistent. | Each subject was tested before the first intervention training and after the sixth intervention training (on average 2-3 weeks after the first intervention). |
| Step Length Change | Kinovea 0.8.15 software was used to calibrate the gait video to analyze and calculate the step length, which is the longitudinal linear distance between two points when the left and right heels touch the ground during walking. The time, place, and testers of the test were kept consistent. | Each subject was tested before the first intervention training and after the sixth intervention training (on average 2-3 weeks after the first intervention). |
| Stride Length Time Change | Kinovea 0.8.15 software was used to calibrate the gait video to analyze and calculate the stride length, which is the time between two consecutive landings on the same side of the heel during walking. The time, place, and testers of the test were kept consistent. | Each subject was tested before the first intervention training and after the sixth intervention training (on average 2-3 weeks after the first intervention). |
| Step Length Time Change | Kinovea 0.8.15 software was used to calibrate the gait video to analyze and calculate the step length time, which is the time between the two points where the left and right heels touch the ground during walking. The time, place, and testers of the test were kept consistent. | Each subject was tested before the first intervention training and after the sixth intervention training (on average 2-3 weeks after the first intervention). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Degree of Knee Swelling Change | The circumference of the knee joint was measured with a soft tape to indicate the degree of swelling of the knee joint. The subject was placed in a supine position with the lower extremities in a slightly flexed and relaxed position, and the hands were placed naturally on the side of the body. The medial and lateral femoral condyles were used as the midline of the knee joint, and the circumference of the knee joint enclosed by this midline was measured and recorded with the upper edge of the soft dipstick to reflect the swelling of the knee joint. The swelling effect of the intervention was reflected by the change in the circumference of the knee before and after training, and the difference in circumference between the two sides could reflect the degree of swelling. The time, place, and testers of the test were kept consistent. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lin Song, Doctor | Beijing Sport University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Sport University | Beijing | Beijing Municipality | 100084 | China |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Land-based Rehabilitation | Other | Peking University Third Hospital Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Postoperative Rehabilitation Guidelines. |
|
| Single Support Phase Change |
Kinovea 0.8.15 software was used to calibrate the gait video to analyze and calculate the single support phase, which is the time between the toe of one foot leaving the ground and the foot following the ground on that side during walking. The time, place, and testers of the test were kept consistent. |
| Each subject was tested before the first intervention training and after the sixth intervention training (on average 2-3 weeks after the first intervention). |
| Oscillation Frequency Change | Oscillation Frequency (Hz) is the intrinsic pressure of the muscle, that is, the pressure carried by the muscle itself in the relaxed state or in the absence of voluntary contraction, and represents the muscle tone. The time, place, and testers of the test were kept consistent. | Each subject was tested before the first intervention training and after the sixth intervention training (on average 2-3 weeks after the first intervention). |
| Mechanical Stress Relaxation Time Change | Mechanical Stress Relaxation Time (MSRT) is the time required for the muscle to return from its deformed state to its original state after active contraction or withdrawal of external pressure. The time, place, and testers of the test were kept consistent. | Each subject was tested before the first intervention training and after the sixth intervention training (on average 2-3 weeks after the first intervention). |
| Creep Change | Creep (Deborah number) is the ratio of the mechanical stress release time to the time required for the muscle to reach maximum deformation by external force, SRT and Creep represent muscle viscosity. The time, place, and testers of the test were kept consistent. | Each subject was tested before the first intervention training and after the sixth intervention training (on average 2-3 weeks after the first intervention). |
| Range of Motion Change | Active and passive Range of Motion in knee flexion. The time, place, and testers of the test were kept consistent. | Each subject was tested before the first intervention training and after the sixth intervention training (on average 2-3 weeks after the first intervention). |
| 2000 IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form Change | 2000 IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form is divided into three modules: knee symptoms (7 questions), motor activity (10 questions) and self-functional score (2 questions), where knee symptoms include frequency and degree of pain, stiffness, swelling, locking and instability; motor activity includes activity level, going up and down stairs, squatting, kneeling straight down, sitting and standing up with bent knees, running, jumping and landing on the affected limb, and quick starts and stops; and self-functional score includes pre-injury and current self-functional scores, graded from unable to perform daily activities (0 points) to unrestricted daily activities (10 points). The time, place, and testers of the test were kept consistent. | Each subject was tested before the first intervention training and after the sixth intervention training (on average 2-3 weeks after the first intervention). Follow-up was performed again one year after the end of the intervention using the IKDC score. |
| Stiffness Change | Stiffness indicates the resistance of a muscle to contraction or to an external force that deforms its initial shape. The time, place, and testers of the test were kept consistent. | Each subject was tested before the first intervention training and after the sixth intervention training (on average 2-3 weeks after the first intervention). |
| Decrement Value Change | The Decrement (Dec) value represents a muscle's ability to return to its initial shape after the reduction or removal of an external force, with muscle elasticity being inversely proportional to the Dec value. A lower Dec value indicates greater muscle elasticity. The time, place, and testers of the test were kept consistent. | Each subject was tested before the first intervention training and after the sixth intervention training (on average 2-3 weeks after the first intervention). |
| Each subject was tested before the first intervention training and after the sixth intervention training (on average 2-3 weeks after the first intervention). |
| Thigh Muscle Atrophy Change | Thigh circumference can indirectly indicate the strength of the knee flexor and extensor muscles by indirectly reflecting the cross-sectional area of the thigh muscles, so the circumference of the thigh at 10 cm above the patella was measured with a soft dermatome to reflect the muscle strength of the thigh, and the resulting atrophy index was calculated to reflect the degree of atrophy of the thigh. The time, place, and testers of the test were kept consistent. | Each subject was tested before the first intervention training and after the sixth intervention training (on average 2-3 weeks after the first intervention). |