Comparison of Labor Induction With Cervical Ripening Balloon, One Versus Tweleve Hours Placement: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparison of Labor Induction With Cervical Ripening Balloon, One Versus Tweleve Hours Placement: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The aim of this study is a comparison of induction of labor with a cervical ripening balloon left in place for one hour compared to twelve hours. The primary outcome is time to delivery.
Women admitted for induction of labor will be recruited and randomized to either a cervical ripening balloon for one hour or twelve hours. the management of delivery after the extraction of the balloon will be left to the discretion of the attending physician.
The common IOL techniques used for pregnant women with unfavorable cervix might be specified to either mechanical induction via cervical ripening balloon (CRB) or pharmacological induction. The insertion of a CRB is believed to mechanically ripen the uterine cervix with a better safety profile than prostaglandins. The duration of the balloon placement varied considerably, and it was commonly placed for 12-24 hours. Nevertheless, recent randomized controlled studies have demonstrated favorable results following only 6 hours of CRB placement with or without additional administration of oxytocin. We believe that mechanical ripening of the cervix can be achieved even less than six hours. Our study aims to evaluate the time to delivery and pregnancy outcomes after placement of CRB of only 1 hour compared to either 6 or 12 hours.
Study Protocol:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
njustman88@gmail.com0546836644