Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| AstraZeneca | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this phase 2 study is to evaluate the effect and the safety of the combination of ANIFROLUMAB in combination with phototherapy in adult participants with non-segmental progressive vitiligo
Treatment Strategy: Multicentric, parallel double blind randomized phase 2 prospective study comparing ANIFROLUMAB (300mg/month) + narrowband UVB TL01 versus placebo + narrowband UVB TL01 Follow-up of the study: patients included in this study will start ANIFROLUMAB 3 months before starting narrowband UVB TL01. Phototherapy will be performed twice a week during 6 months. Follow-up visit will be done at week 12, 24, 36 and 48.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phototherapy associated with active treatment | Experimental | Anifrolumab 300mg/infusion/month for 36 weeks + UVB TL01: 2 times a week during 24 weeks. (Phototherapy will be started 12 weeks after the beginning of anifrolumab) |
|
| Phototherapy associated with placebo | Placebo Comparator | Placebo once a month infusion for 36 weeks + UVB TL01: 2 times a week during 24 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anifrolumab Infusion Product | Drug | Anifrolumab 300mg/month infusion for 36 weeks |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Score with VASI score | The VASI Score is used to assess the severity and extent of Vitilgo. VASI is calculated using a formula that includes contributions from all body regions (possible range, 0-100). The body is divided into 6 separate and mutually exclusive sites (head/neck, hands, upper extremities [excluding hands], trunk, lower extremities [excluding feet], and feet), with percentage of vitiligo involvement estimated in hand units by the same investigator throughout the study. | Week 36 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Score with VASI score | Change in percentage of repigmented Surface area 12 weeks after-inclusion, by using the VASI score at week 12. The VASI Score is used to assess the severity and extent of Vitilgo. VASI is calculated using a formula that includes contributions from all body regions (possible range, 0-100). The body is divided into 6 separate and mutually exclusive sites (head/neck, hands, upper extremities [excluding hands], trunk, lower extremities [excluding feet], and feet), with percentage of vitiligo involvement estimated in hand units by the same investigator throughout the study |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Non-segmental vitiligo with new patches or extension of old lesions during the last 6 months AND Presence of hypochromic aspect under Wood's lamp examination and/or perifollicular hypopigmentation under Wood's lamp examination.
TCS or topical immune modulators (e.g., tacrolimus or pimecrolimus) Topical phosphodiesterase type 4 (PDE-4) inhibitor (e.g. crisaborole) Topical JAK inhibitor (e.g., tofacitinib or ruxolitinib) and/or any other investigational topical treatments.
Patient characteristics
Are male or nonpregnant, nonbreastfeeding female patients:
Male patients must agree to use 2 forms of birth control (1 must be highly effective, see below) while engaging in sexual intercourse with female partners of childbearing potential while enrolled in the study and for at least 4 weeks following the last dose of investigational product.
Female patients of childbearing potential must agree to use 2 forms of birth control, when engaging in sexual intercourse with a male partner while enrolled in the study and for at least 12 weeks following the last dose of investigational product.
The following birth control methods are considered acceptable (the patient should choose 2 to be used with their male partner, and 1 must be highly effective):
Highly effective birth control methods: oral, injectable, or implanted hormonal contraceptives (combined estrogen/progesterone or progesterone only, associated with inhibition of ovulation); intrauterine device (containing copper) or intrauterine system (e.g., progestin-releasing coil); or vasectomized male (with appropriate post vasectomy documentation of the absence of sperm in the ejaculate). Effective birth control methods: condom with a spermicidal foam, gel, film, cream, or suppository; occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with a spermicidal foam, gel, film, cream, or suppository; or oral hormonal contraceptives.
Females of non-childbearing potential are not required to use birth control and they are defined as:
Women ≥60 years of age or women who are congenitally sterile, or Women ≥40 and <60 years of age who have had a cessation of menses for ≥12 months and a folliculostimulating hormone (FSH) test confirming non-childbearing potential (≥40 mIU/mL or ≥40 IU/L), or women who are surgically sterile (i.e., have had a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy or tubal ligation).
Exclusion Criteria:
General exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria related to concomitant medications
Patients that have been treated with the following therapies:
Patients that are largely or wholly incapacitated permitting little or no self-care, such as being bedridden.
Exclusion criteria related to infection and malignancy risk factors
Confirmed positive test for hepatitis B serology for:
Hepatitis B surface antigen, OR
Hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) AND hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA detected above the lower limit of quantitation Note: Patients who were HBcAb positive at screening were tested every 3 months for HBV DNA. To remain eligible for the study, the patient's HBV DNA levels must have remained below the limit of quantitation
Positive test for hepatitis C antibody
Any of the following:
Any infection requiring IV or oral anti-infectives (including antivirals) within 2 weeks prior to Inclusion visit
Have evidence of active TB or latent TB:
have evidence of active TB, defined in this study as the following: Documented by a positive PPD test (≥5 mm induration between approximately 48 and 72 hours after application, regardless of vaccination history), medical history, clinical features, and abnormal chest x-ray at screening. The QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test or TSPOT®.TB test (as available and if compliant with local TB guidelines) may be used instead of the PPD test. Patients are excluded from the study if the test is not negative and there is clinical evidence of active TB.
Exception: Patients with a history of active TB who have documented evidence of appropriate treatment, have no history of re-exposure since their treatment was completed, and have a screening chest x-ray with no evidence of active TB may be enrolled if other entry criteria are met. Such patients would not be required to undergo the protocol-specific TB testing for PPD, QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test, or T-SPOT® TB test but must have a chest x-ray at screening.
have evidence of untreated/inadequately or inappropriately treated latent TB, defined in this study as the following: documented to have a positive PPD test (≥5 mm induration between approximately 48 and 72 hours after application, regardless of vaccination history), no clinical features consistent with active TB, and a chest x-ray with no evidence of active TB at screening; or PPD test is positive and the patient has no medical history or chest x-ray findings consistent with active TB, the patient may have a QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test or TSPOT® TB test (as available and if compliant with local TB guidelines). If the test results are not negative, the patient will be considered to have latent TB (for purposes of this study); or QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test or T-SPOT® TB test (as available and if compliant with local TB guidelines) may be used instead of the PPD test. If the test results are positive, the patient will be considered to have latent TB. If the test is not negative, the test may be repeated once within approximately 2 weeks of the initial value. If the repeat test results are again not negative, the patient will be considered to have latent TB (for purposes of this study). Exception: Patients who have evidence of latent TB may be enrolled if he or she completes at least 4 weeks of appropriate treatment prior to randomization and agrees to complete the remainder of treatment while in the trial.
Exception: Patients with a history of latent TB who have documented evidence of appropriate treatment, have no history of re-exposure since their treatment was completed, and have a screening chest x-ray with no evidence of active TB may be enrolled if other entry criteria are met.
Such patients would not be required to undergo the protocol specific TB testing for PPD, QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test, or TSPOT® TB test but must have a chest x-ray at screening.
Safety exclusions labs
At Screening (within 4 weeks before Week 0 [Day 1]), any of the following:
Confirmed COVID-19: The Baseline Visit must be at least 14 days from onset of signs/symptoms or positive SARS-CoV-2 test; symptomatic subjects must have recovered, defined as resolution of fever without use of antipyretics and improvement in symptoms;
Suspected COVID-19: Subjects with signs/symptoms suggestive of COVID-19, known exposure, or high risk behavior should undergo molecular (e.g., polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) testing to rule out SARS-CoV-2 infection or must be asymptomatic for 14 days from a potential exposure. Perioperative management of investigational product Surgery should be avoided during the study if clinically feasible, but is permitted. If a surgery becomes necessary during the study, it should be scheduled at least 4 weeks after the previous administration of investigational product.
For non-major surgery, the decision to withhold investigational product administration is at the Investigator's discretion.
For major surgery, investigational product administration can be resumed at the Investigator's discretion after all of the following criteria are met:
Other non-inclusion criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julien SENESCHAL, Prof | Contact | +33 (0)5 56 79 49 63 | julien.seneschal@chu-bordeaux.fr | |
| Frédéric PERRY | Contact | +33 (0)5 57 82 11 58 | frederic.perry@chu-bordeaux.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU de Bordeaux | Recruiting | Bordeaux | 33075 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25596811 | Background | Ezzedine K, Eleftheriadou V, Whitton M, van Geel N. Vitiligo. Lancet. 2015 Jul 4;386(9988):74-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60763-7. Epub 2015 Jan 15. | |
| 27189851 | Background | Picardo M, Dell'Anna ML, Ezzedine K, Hamzavi I, Harris JE, Parsad D, Taieb A. Vitiligo. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015 Jun 4;1:15011. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.11. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a multicenter, randomized, non-comparative, phase II proof-of-concept trial involved patients with progressive vitiligo and uses one of the most common regimens in this phase of study. Assessment of the experimental treatment efficacy will be estimated only on the results obtained in the experimental treatment arm (Anifrolumab 300mg/month + narrowband UVB TL01 arm).
Not provided
Not provided
Double (Participant, Investigator) This is a double-blind study. To preserve the blinding of the study, a minimum number of sponsor personnel will see the randomization table and treatment assignments before the study is complete.
All study assessments will be performed by study personnel who are blinded to the patient's treatment group.
Except in clinical circumstances where unblinding is required, the patients, investigators, sponsor study team, and any personnel interacting directly with patients or investigative sites will remain blinded to Anifrolumab and placebo assignment until after completion of the Double-Blinded Treatment Period.
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo once a month, infusion for 36 weeks |
|
| Week 12 |
| Score with VASI score Extent Score (VES) | Change in percentage of repigmented Surface area 24 weeks after-inclusion, by using the VASI score at week 24. The VASI Score is used to assess the severity and extent of Vitilgo. VASI is calculated using a formula that includes contributions from all body regions (possible range, 0-100). The body is divided into 6 separate and mutually exclusive sites (head/neck, hands, upper extremities [excluding hands], trunk, lower extremities [excluding feet], and feet), with percentage of vitiligo involvement estimated in hand units by the same investigator throughout the study. | Week 24 |
| Score with VASI score Extent Score (VES) | Change in percentage of repigmented Surface area 24 weeks after-inclusion, by using the VASI score at week 24. The VASI Score is used to assess the severity and extent of Vitilgo. VASI is calculated using a formula that includes contributions from all body regions (possible range, 0-100). The body is divided into 6 separate and mutually exclusive sites (head/neck, hands, upper extremities [excluding hands], trunk, lower extremities [excluding feet], and feet), with percentage of vitiligo involvement estimated in hand units by the same investigator throughout the study. | Week 48 |
| Face Vitiligo Aera Scoring Index (F-VASI) score | Mean variation in percentage of Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) score between baseline , week 12 | Week 12 |
| Face Vitiligo Aera Scoring Index (F-VASI) score | Mean variation in percentage of Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) score between baseline , week 24 | Week 24 |
| Face Vitiligo Aera Scoring Index (F-VASI) score | Mean variation in percentage of Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) score between baseline , week 36 | Week 36 |
| Face Vitiligo Aera Scoring Index (F-VASI) score | Mean variation in percentage of Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) score between baseline , week 48 | Week 48 |
| Number of Adverse Events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE), as well as the proportion of discontinuation due to AEs and/or SAEs | AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related, that occurs after a subject provides informed consent. Abnormal laboratory values or test results occurring after informed consent constitute AEs only if they induce clinical signs or symptoms, are considered clinically meaningful, require therapy, or require changes in the study drug. | Week 36 |
| Evaluation of score Vitiligo European Task Force (VETF) | Variation of the score Vitiligo European Task Force (VETF) The VETF score is used to assess the severity and extent of vitiligo. The VETF assesses 3 dimensions of the disease in 5 areas (Head/neck, hands and feet, trunk, arms, legs) namely 1/ extent: percentage of vitiligo involvement estimated using the rule of nines, 2/ depigmentation severity grading (stage 0: normal pigmentation Stage 1: incomplete pigmentation , stage 2 complete depigmentation, stage 3: partial hair whitening <30% stage 4: complete hair whitening) and 3/ spreading (score O: similar limits, Score 1: progressive vitiligo; score -1: regressive vitiligo). | Week 12 |
| Evaluation of score Vitiligo European Task Force (VETF) | Variation of the score Vitiligo European Task Force (VETF) The VETF score is used to assess the severity and extent of vitiligo. The VETF assesses 3 dimensions of the disease in 5 areas (Head/neck, hands and feet, trunk, arms, legs) namely 1/ extent: percentage of vitiligo involvement estimated using the rule of nines, 2/ depigmentation severity grading (stage 0: normal pigmentation Stage 1: incomplete pigmentation , stage 2 complete depigmentation, stage 3: partial hair whitening <30% stage 4: complete hair whitening) and 3/ spreading (score O: similar limits, Score 1: progressive vitiligo; score -1: regressive vitiligo). | Week 24 |
| Evaluation of score Vitiligo European Task Force (VETF) | Variation of the score Vitiligo European Task Force (VETF) The VETF score is used to assess the severity and extent of vitiligo. The VETF assesses 3 dimensions of the disease in 5 areas (Head/neck, hands and feet, trunk, arms, legs) namely 1/ extent: percentage of vitiligo involvement estimated using the rule of nines, 2/ depigmentation severity grading (stage 0: normal pigmentation Stage 1: incomplete pigmentation , stage 2 complete depigmentation, stage 3: partial hair whitening <30% stage 4: complete hair whitening) and 3/ spreading (score O: similar limits, Score 1: progressive vitiligo; score -1: regressive vitiligo). | Week 36 |
| Evaluation of score of the Vitiligo Extent Score (VES) | Variation in percentage of the Vitiligo Extent Score (VES). The VES score is used to assess the severity and extent of vitiligo. Using the VES calculator www.vitiligo-calculator.com, investigator choose the pictures that best represent the patient's skin lesions and then the percentage of depigmented area is calculated. | Week 48 |
| Evaluation of score of the Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS) | Variation in percentage of the Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS). The VSAS score is used to assess the activity of the disease. It is assessed by evaluating the number of location with at least one disease sign of activity. | Week 12 |
| Evaluation of score of the Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS) | Variation in percentage of the Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS). The VSAS score is used to assess the activity of the disease. It is assessed by evaluating the number of location with at least one disease sign of activity. | Week 24 |
| Evaluation of score of the Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS) | Variation in percentage of the Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS). The VSAS score is used to assess the activity of the disease. It is assessed by evaluating the number of location with at least one disease sign of activity. | Week 36 |
| Evaluation of score of the Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS) | Variation in percentage of the Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS). The VSAS score is used to assess the activity of the disease. It is assessed by evaluating the number of location with at least one disease sign of activity. | Week 48 |
| Evaluation of score of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Global Impression of Change-Vitiligo (PhGIC-V) | Variation of the score of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). DLQI is a 10-item instrument, each item scored from 0 to 3 where higher scores correspond to worse symptom impact, full range from 0 to 30. | Week 12 |
| Evaluation of score of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Global Impression of Change-Vitiligo (PhGIC-V) | Variation of the score of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). DLQI is a 10-item instrument, each item scored from 0 to 3 where higher scores correspond to worse symptom impact, full range from 0 to 30. | Week 24 |
| Evaluation of score of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Global Impression of Change-Vitiligo (PhGIC-V) | Variation of the score of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). DLQI is a 10-item instrument, each item scored from 0 to 3 where higher scores correspond to worse symptom impact, full range from 0 to 30. | Week 36 |
| Evaluation of score of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Global Impression of Change-Vitiligo (PhGIC-V) | Variation of the score of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). DLQI is a 10-item instrument, each item scored from 0 to 3 where higher scores correspond to worse symptom impact, full range from 0 to 30. | Week 48 |
| Evaluation of the score of the Skindex 29 | Variation of the score of the Skindex 29. SkinDex29 is a 30-item instrument, each item scored from 1 to 5 where higher scores correspond to worse symptom impact, full range from 0 to 150. | Week 12 |
| Evaluation of the score of the Skindex 29 | Variation of the score of the Skindex 29. SkinDex29 is a 30-item instrument, each item scored from 1 to 5 where higher scores correspond to worse symptom impact, full range from 0 to 150. | Week 24 |
| Evaluation of the score of the Skindex 29 | Variation of the score of the Skindex 29. SkinDex29 is a 30-item instrument, each item scored from 1 to 5 where higher scores correspond to worse symptom impact, full range from 0 to 150. | Week 36 |
| Evaluation of the score of the Vitiligo Impact Patient Scale (VIP) | Variation of the score of the Vitiligo Impact Patient Scale (VIP). Vitiligo Impact Scale is a 12-item instrument, each item scored from 0 to 5 where higher scores correspond to worse symptom impact, full range from 0 to 145 | Week 48 |
| Evaluation of the score of the Vitiligo Impact Patient Scale (VIP) | Variation of the score of the Vitiligo Impact Patient Scale (VIP). Vitiligo Impact Scale is a 12-item instrument, each item scored from 0 to 5 where higher scores correspond to worse symptom impact, full range from 0 to 145 | Week 12 |
| Evaluation of the score of the Vitiligo Impact Patient Scale (VIP) | Variation of the score of the Vitiligo Impact Patient Scale (VIP). Vitiligo Impact Scale is a 12-item instrument, each item scored from 0 to 5 where higher scores correspond to worse symptom impact, full range from 0 to 145 | Week 24 |
| Evaluation of the score of the Vitiligo Impact Patient Scale (VIP) | Variation of the score of the Vitiligo Impact Patient Scale (VIP). Vitiligo Impact Scale is a 12-item instrument, each item scored from 0 to 5 where higher scores correspond to worse symptom impact, full range from 0 to 145 | Week 36 |
| Evaluation of the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) | Variation of the VNS score. The VNS is a patient-reported measure of vitiligo treatment success that is rated on a 5-point scale. The participant was asked to respond to the following query: Compared with before treatment, how noticeable is the vitiligo now? Responses: (1) more noticeable, (2) as noticeable, (3) slightly less noticeable, (4) a lot less noticeable, and (5) no longer noticeable. higher score corresponds to worse symptom impact | Week 12 |
| Evaluation of the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) | Variation of the VNS score. The VNS is a patient-reported measure of vitiligo treatment success that is rated on a 5-point scale. The participant was asked to respond to the following query: Compared with before treatment, how noticeable is the vitiligo now? Responses: (1) more noticeable, (2) as noticeable, (3) slightly less noticeable, (4) a lot less noticeable, and (5) no longer noticeable. higher score corresponds to worse symptom impact | Week 24 |
| Evaluation of the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) | Variation of the VNS score. The VNS is a patient-reported measure of vitiligo treatment success that is rated on a 5-point scale. The participant was asked to respond to the following query: Compared with before treatment, how noticeable is the vitiligo now? Responses: (1) more noticeable, (2) as noticeable, (3) slightly less noticeable, (4) a lot less noticeable, and (5) no longer noticeable. higher score corresponds to worse symptom impact | Week 36 |
| Evaluation of the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) | Variation of the VNS score. The VNS is a patient-reported measure of vitiligo treatment success that is rated on a 5-point scale. The participant was asked to respond to the following query: Compared with before treatment, how noticeable is the vitiligo now? Responses: (1) more noticeable, (2) as noticeable, (3) slightly less noticeable, (4) a lot less noticeable, and (5) no longer noticeable. higher score corresponds to worse symptom impact | Week 48 |
| Evolution of Physician's Global Impression of Change- Vitiligo (PhGIC-V) | Variation of the PhGIC-V. The PhGIC-V is a physician measure of vitiligo treatment success that is rated on a 5-point scale. Overall improvement: (1) much improved, (2)minimally improved, (3)no change), (4)minimally worse, (5)much worse. Higher score corresponds to worse symptom. | Week 12 |
| Evolution of Physician's Global Impression of Change- Vitiligo (PhGIC-V) | Variation of the PhGIC-V. The PhGIC-V is a physician measure of vitiligo treatment success that is rated on a 5-point scale. Overall improvement: (1) much improved, (2)minimally improved, (3)no change), (4)minimally worse, (5)much worse. Higher score corresponds to worse symptom. | Week 24 |
| Evolution of Physician's Global Impression of Change- Vitiligo (PhGIC-V) | Variation of the PhGIC-V. The PhGIC-V is a physician measure of vitiligo treatment success that is rated on a 5-point scale. Overall improvement: (1) much improved, (2)minimally improved, (3)no change), (4)minimally worse, (5)much worse. Higher score corresponds to worse symptom. | Week 36 |
| Evolution of Physician's Global Impression of Change- Vitiligo (PhGIC-V) | Variation of the PhGIC-V. The PhGIC-V is a physician measure of vitiligo treatment success that is rated on a 5-point scale. Overall improvement: (1) much improved, (2)minimally improved, (3)no change), (4)minimally worse, (5)much worse. Higher score corresponds to worse symptom. | Week 48 |
| Evolution of Patient's Global Impression of Change- Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) | Variation of the PaGIC-V. The PaGIC-V is a patient-reported measure of vitiligo treatment success that is rated on a 5-point scale. Overall improvement: (1) much improved, (2)minimally improved, (3)no change), (4)minimally worse, (5)much worse. Higher score corresponds to worse symptom. | Week 12 |
| Evolution of Patient's Global Impression of Change- Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) | Variation of the PaGIC-V. The PaGIC-V is a patient-reported measure of vitiligo treatment success that is rated on a 5-point scale. Overall improvement: (1) much improved, (2)minimally improved, (3)no change), (4)minimally worse, (5)much worse. Higher score corresponds to worse symptom. | Week 24 |
| Evolution of Patient's Global Impression of Change- Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) | Variation of the PaGIC-V. The PaGIC-V is a patient-reported measure of vitiligo treatment success that is rated on a 5-point scale. Overall improvement: (1) much improved, (2)minimally improved, (3)no change), (4)minimally worse, (5)much worse. Higher score corresponds to worse symptom. | Week 36 |
| Evolution of Patient's Global Impression of Change- Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) | Variation of the PaGIC-V. The PaGIC-V is a patient-reported measure of vitiligo treatment success that is rated on a 5-point scale. Overall improvement: (1) much improved, (2)minimally improved, (3)no change), (4)minimally worse, (5)much worse. Higher score corresponds to worse symptom. | Week 48 |
| Evolution of the Total Physician Global Vitiligo Assessment (T-PhGVA) | Variation fo the T-PhGVA: The T-PhGVA is a physician measure of vitiligo treatment success that is rated on a 4-point scale: overall improvement: (0) no change, (1)limited extent, (2)moderate extent, (3)extensive, (4)very extensive). Higher score corresponds to worse evaluation | Week 12 |
| Evolution of the Total Physician Global Vitiligo Assessment (T-PhGVA) | Variation fo the T-PhGVA: The T-PhGVA is a physician measure of vitiligo treatment success that is rated on a 4-point scale: overall improvement: (0) no change, (1)limited extent, (2)moderate extent, (3)extensive, (4)very extensive). Higher score corresponds to worse evaluation | Week 24 |
| Evolution of the Total Physician Global Vitiligo Assessment (T-PhGVA) | Variation fo the T-PhGVA: The T-PhGVA is a physician measure of vitiligo treatment success that is rated on a 4-point scale: overall improvement: (0) no change, (1)limited extent, (2)moderate extent, (3)extensive, (4)very extensive). Higher score corresponds to worse evaluation | Week 36 |
| Evolution of the Total Physician Global Vitiligo Assessment (T-PhGVA) | Variation fo the T-PhGVA: The T-PhGVA is a physician measure of vitiligo treatment success that is rated on a 4-point scale: overall improvement: (0) no change, (1)limited extent, (2)moderate extent, (3)extensive, (4)very extensive). Higher score corresponds to worse evaluation | Week 48 |
| Evaluation of blood inflammatory markers using immunofluorescence on skin biopsies and ELISA multiplex. | Expression of IFN-α, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-5, IL-12, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, IL-22, IL-23, IL-33 CXCL4, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCL12, CXCL16, CCL20, soluble HSP70. | Day 1 |
| Evaluation of blood inflammatory markers using immunofluorescence on skin biopsies and ELISA multiplex. | Expression of IFN-α, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-5, IL-12, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, IL-22, IL-23, IL-33 CXCL4, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCL12, CXCL16, CCL20, soluble HSP70. | Week 12 |
| Evaluation of blood inflammatory markers using immunofluorescence on skin biopsies and ELISA multiplex. | Expression of IFN-α, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-5, IL-12, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, IL-22, IL-23, IL-33 CXCL4, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCL12, CXCL16, CCL20, soluble HSP70. | Week 36 |
| Centre Hospitalier Régional Le Mans | Not yet recruiting | Le Mans | 72037 | France |
|
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice | Not yet recruiting | Nice | 06000 | France |
|
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse | Not yet recruiting | Toulouse | 31059 | France |
|
| 25710794 | Background | Whitton ME, Pinart M, Batchelor J, Leonardi-Bee J, Gonzalez U, Jiyad Z, Eleftheriadou V, Ezzedine K. Interventions for vitiligo. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 24;2015(2):CD003263. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003263.pub5. |
| 15210457 | Background | Hamzavi I, Jain H, McLean D, Shapiro J, Zeng H, Lui H. Parametric modeling of narrowband UV-B phototherapy for vitiligo using a novel quantitative tool: the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. Arch Dermatol. 2004 Jun;140(6):677-83. doi: 10.1001/archderm.140.6.677. |
| 28685247 | Background | Boniface K, Seneschal J, Picardo M, Taieb A. Vitiligo: Focus on Clinical Aspects, Immunopathogenesis, and Therapy. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018 Feb;54(1):52-67. doi: 10.1007/s12016-017-8622-7. |
| 24438589 | Background | Bertolotti A, Boniface K, Vergier B, Mossalayi D, Taieb A, Ezzedine K, Seneschal J. Type I interferon signature in the initiation of the immune response in vitiligo. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014 May;27(3):398-407. doi: 10.1111/pcmr.12219. Epub 2014 Feb 21. |
| 28380264 | Background | Jacquemin C, Rambert J, Guillet S, Thiolat D, Boukhedouni N, Doutre MS, Darrigade AS, Ezzedine K, Blanco P, Taieb A, Boniface K, Seneschal J. Heat shock protein 70 potentiates interferon alpha production by plasmacytoid dendritic cells: relevance for cutaneous lupus and vitiligo pathogenesis. Br J Dermatol. 2017 Nov;177(5):1367-1375. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15550. Epub 2017 Oct 25. |
| 32369451 | Background | Boukhedouni N, Martins C, Darrigade AS, Drullion C, Rambert J, Barrault C, Garnier J, Jacquemin C, Thiolat D, Lucchese F, Morel F, Ezzedine K, Taieb A, Bernard FX, Seneschal J, Boniface K. Type-1 cytokines regulate MMP-9 production and E-cadherin disruption to promote melanocyte loss in vitiligo. JCI Insight. 2020 Jun 4;5(11):e133772. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.133772. |
| 28927891 | Background | Boniface K, Jacquemin C, Darrigade AS, Dessarthe B, Martins C, Boukhedouni N, Vernisse C, Grasseau A, Thiolat D, Rambert J, Lucchese F, Bertolotti A, Ezzedine K, Taieb A, Seneschal J. Vitiligo Skin Is Imprinted with Resident Memory CD8 T Cells Expressing CXCR3. J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Feb;138(2):355-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.08.038. Epub 2017 Sep 18. |
| 31851795 | Background | Morand EF, Furie R, Tanaka Y, Bruce IN, Askanase AD, Richez C, Bae SC, Brohawn PZ, Pineda L, Berglind A, Tummala R; TULIP-2 Trial Investigators. Trial of Anifrolumab in Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 16;382(3):211-221. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1912196. Epub 2019 Dec 18. |
| 21712822 | Background | Brown SR, Gregory WM, Twelves CJ, Buyse M, Collinson F, Parmar M, Seymour MT, Brown JM. Designing phase II trials in cancer: a systematic review and guidance. Br J Cancer. 2011 Jul 12;105(2):194-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.235. Epub 2011 Jun 28. |
| 17981025 | Background | Ratain MJ, Humphrey RW, Gordon GB, Fyfe G, Adamson PC, Fleming TR, Stadler WM, Berry DA, Peck CC. Recommended changes to oncology clinical trial design: revolution or evolution? Eur J Cancer. 2008 Jan;44(1):8-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.09.011. Epub 2007 Nov 5. No abstract available. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014820 | Vitiligo |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017496 | Hypopigmentation |
| D010859 | Pigmentation Disorders |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided