Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Blood pressure (BP) monitoring is essential for managing cardiovascular diseases. Arterial line (A-line), the clinical gold standard for BP monitoring, is too invasive for routine measurements. The sphygmomanometer, on the other hand, is non-invasive but captures only discrete values. The recently introduced conformal ultrasound sensor offers non-invasive and continuous monitoring of BP, which can potentially improve the quality of patient care, but its accuracy has yet to be thoroughly validated. Here the investigators are working to validate the accuracy of a redesigned ultrasound sensor with enhanced reliability in BP measurements at-home and in clinics even under different interventions.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound blood pressure sensor |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sphygmomanometer | Device | Comparison to the ultrasound sensor |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Device comparison to standard monitoring (Sphygmomanometer) | Clinical feasibility of the calibration accuracy of the non-invasive ultrasound blood pressure sensor in comparison to a sphygmomanometer on 10 participants. | 2 years |
| Device comparison to standard monitoring (A-line) | Clinical feasibility of the ultrasound blood pressure sensor for monitoring trend changes for continuous 12 hours of measurement in comparison to an arterial line in the Intensive Care Unit on 10 participants. | 2 years |
| Device comparison to standard monitoring (A-line) | Clinical feasibility of the ultrasound blood pressure sensor in comparison to an arterial line in the catheterization laboratory on 40 participants. | 3 years |
| Device comparison to standard monitoring (Sphygmomanometer) | Clinical feasibility of the device accuracy of the non-invasive ultrasound blood pressure sensor in comparison to a sphygmomanometer on 90 participants in consulting room on orthostatic hypotension participants. | 4 years |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Participants without any severe cardiac anomalies
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCSD | La Jolla | California | 92093 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019722 | Sphygmomanometers |
| D062666 | Vascular Access Devices |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019719 | Diagnostic Equipment |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
| D057785 | Catheters |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Arterial Line |
| Device |
Comparison to the ultrasound sensor |
|