Scalpel Versus Diathermy for Transverse Abdominal Incision in Women Undergoing First Elective Caesarean Section: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Scalpel Versus Diathermy for Transverse Abdominal Incision in Women Undergoing First Elective Caesarean Section: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The objective of this study will be to compare two methods of skin incisions during the first caesarean section (CS), that is scalpel and diathermy, assessing differences in blood loss during incision, incisional time, total surgery time, post-operative pain, wound healing, complications, and cosmetic outcomes.
The scalpel has been historically used as the primary cutting tool during caesarean section (CS). However, advancements in surgical devices have introduced alternatives, such as the option to make a diathermic cut using electrosurgical units.
General surgeons have extensively demonstrated the advantages of diathermy over the scalpel for abdominal wall incisions, including faster opening time, reduced incisional blood loss, decreased post-operative pain, and a comparable wound complication rate.
In obstetrics, there is a scarcity of evidence in this regard, and no consensus or guidelines have been established regarding the optimal method for making a transverse abdominal incision during the first elective CS. Currently, the choice between using a scalpel or diathermy remains at discretion of the obstetric surgeon. The objective of this study will be to compare both methods of skin incisions during the first CS, assessing differences in blood loss during incision, incisional time, total surgery time, post-operative pain, wound healing, complications, and cosmetic outcomes.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
amerigo.vitagliano@gmail.com0805593321
amerigo.vitagliano@gmail.com0805593321