Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-Mar-012 | Other Identifier | ERES-Converge IRB |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office (HE2RO), University of the Witwatersrand | UNKNOWN |
| Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc. | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To achieve global goals for the treatment of HIV, many countries are piloting and scaling up differentiated service delivery models (DSD). A handful of efforts have been formally described and evaluated in the literature; many others are being implemented formally or informally under routine care, without a research or evaluation goal. For most countries however, the investigators have little evidence on progress and challenges at the facility level-the number of patients actually participating in DSD models, health outcomes and non-health outcomes, effects on service delivery capacity and clinic efficiency and operations, and costs to providers and patients.
Alternative Models of ART Delivery: Optimizing Benefits (AMBIT) is a set of data synthesis, data collection, and data analysis activities aimed at generating information for near- and long-term decision making and creating an approach and platform for ongoing evaluation of differentiated models of HIV treatment delivery. The first AMBIT protocol, "Gathering Records to Evaluate Antiretroviral Treatment" (GREAT, Zambia Ref. No. 2019-Sep-030), collects and analyzes comprehensive patient medical record data, allowing us to assess the effect of DSD models on patients' clinical outcomes and to evaluate uptake of DSD models at scale.
The Sentinel-Zambia study, the second AMBIT protocol, is examining the effect of DSD models on patient and provider satisfaction, service delivery capacity and quality, costs to patients, and other outcomes for which data are not routinely collected in patient-level medical records. The first round of Sentinel-SA was conducted in 2021. The AMBIT 2.0 protocol will allow up to four additional annual rounds of data collection, in 2022-2025. The investigators collected clinic aggregate data, conducted surveys of patients and providers, and observed operations at a selected set of 12 Zambian healthcare facilities and their affiliated DSD models in Round 1. Round 2 (2022) and later rounds will collect the same types of data at 12 facilities in Zambia and will expand the study's research questions to include differentiated models of HIV testing and linkage to care. Results are expected to inform Zambian policy makers and other local and international stakeholders on the actual implications of DSD models for patients, health system operations, and healthcare budgets.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIV treatment survey participants | HIV treatment patients eligible to be enrolled in the patient survey |
| |
| Provider survey participants | HIV treatment providers eligible to be enrolled in the provider survey |
| |
| Time and motion observation participants | HIV treatment providers eligible to be enrolled in the time and motion observation study |
| |
| HIV testing survey participants | Individuals presenting for HIV testing eligible to be enrolled in the HIV testing survey |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No intervention | Other | Observational data collection only. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of patient survey participants with HIV viral suppression ≤400 copies/ml at most recent test | Viral suppression among ART patients enrolled and not enrolled in differentiated service delivery models | 12 months after enrollment |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion criteria for the time and motion study are:
Inclusion criteria for provider interviews are:
Inclusion criteria for the patient survey are:
Inclusion criteria for the testing survey are:
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria for the time and motion study are:
● None.
Exclusion criteria for provider interviews are:
● None.
Exclusion criteria for the patient survey are:
Exclusion criteria for the testing survey are:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Clients using the Zambian public health system and providers employed by that system.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sydney Rosen, MPA | Department of Global Health, BU School of Public Health | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinton Health Access Initiative-Zambia | Lusaka | Zambia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40420127 | Result | Ntjikelane V, Phiri B, Kaiser JL, Rosen S, Morgan AJ, Huber A, Mokhele I, Tchereni T, Ngoma S, Lumano-Mulenga P, Pascoe S, Scott N. Effect of differentiated service delivery models for HIV treatment on healthcare providers' job satisfaction and workloads in sub-Saharan Africa: a mixed methods study from Malawi, Zambia, and South Africa. Hum Resour Health. 2025 May 26;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12960-025-00993-6. | |
| 40585576 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Project website | View source |
Not provided
Data that are collected by the study will be made available after protocol closure. Data that are owned by others (e.g. the National Department of Health) cannot be shared by the authors.
Within one year of protocol closure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Result |
| Mokhele I, Ntjikelane V, Scott NA, Kaiser JL, Morgan AJ, Huber A, Mokgethi NO, Tchereni TH, Phiri W, Kamanga A, Haimbe PM, Lumano-Mulenga P, Nyirenda RK, Pascoe SJS, Rosen S. Are HIV Treatment Clients Offered a Choice of Differentiated Service Delivery Models? Evidence from Malawi, South Africa, and Zambia. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jun 25;19:1825-1841. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S494679. eCollection 2025. |
| 41108425 | Result | Mutanda N, Morgan A, Huber A, Scott N, Mokhele I, Tcherini T, Masina T, Nyirenda R, Kamanga A, Lumano-Mulenga P, Rosen S, Pascoe S. Experiences of Testing Negative or Positive for HIV in Malawi, South Africa, and Zambia: A Cross-Sectional Study. AIDS Behav. 2026 Mar;30(3):766-777. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04921-6. Epub 2025 Oct 18. |