Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-000998-31 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Laboratoire EISAI | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Currently in France, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents over 30% of indications of liver transplantation (LT) (# 500 cases/year). Chemoembolization (TACE) is the most commonly used bridge treatment in those patients (estimate 60%). These patients will present with a complete response in only 60 % of the cases (# 180 patients per year in France) and failure in 40 % of the cases (# 120 patients per year in France).
A systemic treatment using lenvatinib might provide a benefit in patients presenting with a non-resectable HCC in waiting list for LT and with a TACE failure (i.e. those with an active disease and a partial response or a stable disease or a progressive disease on imaging data, in particular when AFP remains significantly increased after 2 TACE) by decreasing dropout rate before LT and decreasing recurrence rate post-LT without new safety signal.
The investigators identified a sub-group of patients with non resectable HCC that could benefit from a systemic neoadjuvant medical strategy before liver transplantation (LT). In these patients, the investigators propose to add oral systemic chemotherapy with lenvatinib as a bridging/downstaging therapeutic approach until LT.
In the case of at least partial response or stability under lenvatinib and within AFP score of 2, the patients will be transplanted and lenvatinib will be stopped on the day or the day before LT (depending on the availability of the graft).
In the case of disease progression, the patient will stop prematurely the lenvatinib treatment and will be treated according to usual practices. The patient's eligibility for LT will be assessed according to usual practices.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lenvatinib | Experimental | Lenvatinib will be administred orally and daily at the usual dose ( 8 or 12 mg per day depending on the weight < or ≥ 60kg) in the 25 patients of the study from TACE failure until LT |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lenvatinib | Drug | Lenvatinib will be administred orally and daily at the usual dose ( 8 or 12 mg per day depending on the weight < or ≥ 60kg) in the 25 patients of the study from TACE failure until LT |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The proportion of patients with lenvatinib who have a Liver transplantation (LT) | The proportion of patients with TACE failure and treated with lenvatinib who have a LT | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to progression under lenvatinib | Time to progression under lenvatinib before LT by imaging. Progression will be based on RECIST and mRECIST | up to 12 months and until LT |
| Progression under lenvatinib |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Non resectable HCC
Initial French AFP score < or = 2
Registered on national waiting list for LT
Who underwent TACE as a bridge to LT
With no complete response after 2 TACE (i.e. persistent active disease, including stable disease or partial response or progression)
Non eligible for percutaneous ablation
Informed, written consent obtained from the patient
Having the rights to French social insurance
Aged of 18 years or older
Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function as assessed by the following laboratory tests:
Patient with QT/QTc < 480 ms
Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) need to accept one effective method of contraception until 1 month after the last lenvatinib intake and avoid pregnancy
Patients who are sexually active with WOCBP partners need to accept one effective method of contraception until 1 month after lenvatinib intake and men must agree to use adequate contraception.
Exclusion Criteria:
Contraindication of lenvatinib and excipient
Cardiovascular:
Ongoing ascites: Refractory ascites according to EASL guidelines definition (ascites that cannot be mobilized or the early recurrence of which cannot be prevented because of a lack of response to sodium restriction and diuretic treatment)
Coagulopathy
Ongoing infection > Grade 2 according to NCI-current CTCAE . Hepatitis B is allowed if no active replication is present (below 100 IU/mL). Hepatitis C is allowed if no antiviral treatment is ongoing
Known hypersensitivity to the study drug or excipients in the formulation
Decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh > A6)
Prior systemic therapy with oral TKI and/or immunotherapy
Past or concurrent history of neoplasm other than HCC, except for in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri and/or non-melanoma skin cancer and superficial bladder tumours. Any cancer curatively treated > 3 years prior to study entry is permitted
Recent digestive bleeding associated with portal hypertension (whithin the 3 months prior to inclusion in the study)
Advanced or Metastatic HCC (BCLC C)
Persistent proteinuria of NCI-current CTCAE ≥ Grade ≥ Grade 3
Project of living donor
Pregnant or lactating woman
Curator or guardianship or patient placed under judicial protection
Participation in other interventional research during the study.
History within the past 3 months before enrollment of haemorrhage, gastrointestinal perforation, gastrointestinal or non-gastrointestinal fistula,
History of aneurism,
Hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia and hypocalcemia
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Olivier ROSMORDUC | APHP, Paul Brousse Hospital, villejuif, France | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital Haut levêque | Bordeaux | France | ||||
| Hospital Henri Mondor |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Progression under lenvatinib before LT by imaging. Progression will be bases on RECIST and mRECIST
| up to 12 months and until LT |
| Response rate | Response rate before LT by imaging | up to 12 months and until LT |
| Response rate | Response rate by liver specimen pathology after the LT | after the LT, during 18 months |
| Recurrence rate | Recurrence rate after LT by imaging | after LT, during 18 months |
| Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events using current CTCAE | Throughout the study, an average of 31 months |
| Créteil |
| France |
| Hospital Claude Huriez | Lille | France |
| Pontchaillou Hospital | Rennes | France |
| Hospital Trousseau | Tours | France |
| Paul Brousse Hospital | Villejuif | France |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C531958 | lenvatinib |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided