Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5R43MH128431-02 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The Electronic Youth-Nominated Support Team (eYST), is experimental. The purpose of this study is to get feedback from users about eYST. Another purpose of this study is to learn how well eYST helps youth.
Assessment data from multiple stakeholders (i.e., youth, parents, and support adults) will be collected at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks via self-report and semi-structured interviews.
A request to extend the record's NIH results reporting deadline to November 1, 2025 was submitted in a timely manner prior to October-November 2025 government shutdown. This request was approved retroactively once the shutdown ended on November 12. During the shutdown, the record was locked and could not be edited by the Responsible Party. Results were submitted as soon as possible upon the unlocking of the record.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| eYST website | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| eYST website | Behavioral | The website is a psychoeducational, social support program for adolescents at risk for suicide |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| System Usability Scale (SUS) Score - Youth Participants | 10-item measure. Scores ranged from 0 to 100. The researchers calculated the mean score. A mean score of 68 was the minimal indicator of usability. Results reflect data from Youth Participants. | At 4 Weeks |
| System Usability Scale (SUS) Score - Adult Caregiver Participants | 10-item measure. Scores ranged from 0 to 100. The researchers calculated the mean score. A mean score of 68 was the minimal indicator of usability. Results reflect data from Adult Caregiver Participants. | At 4 Weeks |
| System Usability Scale (SUS) Score - Adult Support Participants | 10-item measure. Scores ranged from 0 to 100. The researchers calculated the mean score. A mean score of 68 was the minimal indicator of usability. Results reflect data from Adult Support Participants. | At 8 Weeks |
| Frequency of Use of App - Youth Participants | Website usage metrics were captured by counting the number of website log-ins by Youth (adolescent) Participants. | Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 |
| Frequency of Use of App - Adult Caregiver Participants | Website usage metrics were captured by counting the number of website log-ins by parents/caregivers. | Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 |
| Frequency of Use of App - Adult Support Participants | Website usage metrics were captured by counting the number of website log-ins by supporting adults. | Week 1, 4, 8, 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) - Youth Participants | Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher perceived intervention feasibility. Results reflect data from Youth Participants. | At 4 Weeks |
| Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) - Adult Caregiver Participants |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alejandra Arango | University of Michigan | Principal Investigator |
| Patricia Simon | Oui Therapeutics, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan Medicine | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Data could be collected from either youth or parent participants, even if their corresponding adult or youth did not respond at a given time point.
Participants were youths and one of their primary caregivers. In order to proceed to the trial, the caregiver had to consent, and the youth had to assent.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | eYST Website - Youth Participants | eYST website: The website is a psychoeducational, social support program for adolescents at risk for suicide Youth participants reviewed the program and nominated Adult Support participants to be part of their support team. |
| FG001 | eYST Website - Adult Caregiver Participants | eYST website: The website is a psychoeducational, social support program for adolescents at risk for suicide Adult Caregiver participants reviewed the program and approved, rejected, or suggested Adult Support participants for the corresponding youth participant. |
| FG002 | eYST Website - Adult Support Participant | eYST website: The website is a psychoeducational, social support program for adolescents at risk for suicide Adult Support participants were invited to be part of the program by a corresponding Youth Participant, learned about the program, received education through the website, and scheduled contact with the YST intervention specialist from the study team. Adult Support participants could be invited by Youth Participants as early as the initial visit. |
| FG003 | eYST Website - Adult Caregiver and Adult Support Participants | eYST website: The website is a psychoeducational, social support program for adolescents at risk for suicide Participants in this arm were Adult Caregiver participants who were also invited to act as Adult Support participants by their corresponding Youth Participant. Adult Caregiver participants could be invited to be Adult Support participants by Youth Participants as early as the initial visit. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up to 1 Week |
| |||||||||||||
| Up to 12 Weeks |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | eYST Website - Youth Participants | eYST website: The website is a psychoeducational, social support program for adolescents at risk for suicide Youth participants reviewed the program and nominated Adult Support participants to be part of their support team. |
| BG001 | eYST Website - Adult Caregiver Participants |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Data was missing for 1 caregiver participant. |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | System Usability Scale (SUS) Score - Youth Participants | 10-item measure. Scores ranged from 0 to 100. The researchers calculated the mean score. A mean score of 68 was the minimal indicator of usability. Results reflect data from Youth Participants. | 1 youth participant was lost to follow up. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 4 Weeks |
|
|
12 weeks
Per protocol, adverse event data was only collected about Youth Participants. No adverse event data was collected about adult participants.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | eYST Website - Youth Participants | eYST website: The website is a psychoeducational, social support program for adolescents at risk for suicide Youth participants reviewed the program and nominated Adult Support participants to be part of their support team. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychiatric Hospitalization | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alejandra Arango | University of Michigan | 734-764-0231 | arango@med.umich.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 22, 2024 | Sep 15, 2025 | Prot_SAP_001.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Sep 18, 2024 | Feb 21, 2025 | ICF_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013405 | Suicide |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016728 | Self-Injurious Behavior |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Duration of Use of App - Youth Participants | Website usage metrics were captured by measuring the duration of website use by adolescents. | Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 |
| Duration of Use of App - Adult Caregiver Participants | Website usage metrics were captured by measuring the duration of website use by parents/caregivers. | Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 |
| Duration of Use of App - Adult Support Participants | Website usage metrics were captured by measuring the duration of website use by by support adults. | Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 |
Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher perceived intervention feasibility. Results reflect data from Adult Caregiver Participants. |
| At 4 Weeks |
| Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) - Adult Support Participants | Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher perceived intervention feasibility. Results reflect data from Adult Support Participants. | At 8 Weeks |
| Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) - Youth Participants | Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher acceptability. Results reflect data from Youth Participants. | At 4 Weeks |
| Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) - Adult Caregiver Participants | Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher acceptability. Results reflect data from Adult Caregiver Participants. | At 4 Weeks |
| Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) - Adult Support Participants | Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher acceptability. Results reflect data from Adult Support Participants. | At 8 Weeks |
| Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) - Youth Participants | Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher perceived intervention appropriateness. Results reflect data from Youth Participants. | At 4 Weeks |
| Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) - Adult Caregiver Participants | Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher perceived intervention appropriateness. Results reflect data from Adult Caregiver Participants. | At 4 Weeks |
| Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) - Adult Support Participants | Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher perceived intervention appropriateness. Results reflect data from Adult Support Participants. | At 8 Weeks |
| Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-I) - Youth Participants | The CSQ-I was a valid and reliable scale for measuring overall satisfaction with health and human services, including digital or internet-based intervention. This was adapted for use with youth, parents, and support adults. The adapted scales each had 8 items in a Likert scale ranging from 8-32 where higher numbers indicated higher satisfaction. Results reflect data from Youth Participants. | At 4 Weeks |
| Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-I) - Adult Caregiver Participants | The CSQ-I was a valid and reliable scale for measuring overall satisfaction with health and human services, including digital or internet-based intervention. This was adapted for use with youth, parents, and support adults. The adapted scales each had 8 items in a Likert scale ranging from 8-32 where higher numbers indicated higher satisfaction. Results reflect data from Adult Caregiver Participants. | At 4 Weeks |
| Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-I) - Adult Support Participants | The CSQ-I was a valid and reliable scale for measuring overall satisfaction with health and human services, including digital or internet-based intervention. This was adapted for use with youth, parents, and support adults. The adapted scales each had 8 items in a Likert scale ranging from 8-32 where higher numbers indicated higher satisfaction. Results reflect data from Adult Support Participants. | At 8 Weeks |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
eYST website: The website is a psychoeducational, social support program for adolescents at risk for suicide Adult Caregiver participants reviewed the program and approved, rejected, or suggested Adult Support participants for the corresponding youth participant. |
| BG002 | eYST Website - Adult Support Participants | eYST website: The website is a psychoeducational, social support program for adolescents at risk for suicide Adult Support participants were invited to be part of the program by a corresponding Youth Participant, learned about the program, received education through the website, and scheduled contact with the YST intervention specialist from the study team. Adult Support participants could be invited by Youth Participants as early as the initial visit. |
| BG003 | eYST Website - Adult Caregiver & Support Participants | eYST website: The website is a psychoeducational, social support program for adolescents at risk for suicide Participants in this arm were Adult Caregiver participants who were also invited to act as Adult Support participants by their corresponding Youth Participant. Adult Caregiver participants could be invited to be Adult Support participants by Youth Participants as early as the initial visit. |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Mean |
| Standard Deviation |
| years |
|
| Sex/Gender, Customized | Gender Identity | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Data was missing for 1 caregiver participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Data was missing for 1 caregiver participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Data was missing for 1 caregiver participant. | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Primary | System Usability Scale (SUS) Score - Adult Caregiver Participants | 10-item measure. Scores ranged from 0 to 100. The researchers calculated the mean score. A mean score of 68 was the minimal indicator of usability. Results reflect data from Adult Caregiver Participants. | This outcome includes data from all Caregivers regardless of whether they were also named by a Youth Participant as an Adult Support Participant. 1 caregiver participant withdrew from the trial prior to data collection. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 4 Weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | System Usability Scale (SUS) Score - Adult Support Participants | 10-item measure. Scores ranged from 0 to 100. The researchers calculated the mean score. A mean score of 68 was the minimal indicator of usability. Results reflect data from Adult Support Participants. | This outcome includes data from all Adult Support Participants regardless of whether they were also a Youth's Adult Caregiver. Data was not collected from 6 Adult Support Participants, as they did not complete the follow-up. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 8 Weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Frequency of Use of App - Youth Participants | Website usage metrics were captured by counting the number of website log-ins by Youth (adolescent) Participants. | Usage information was gathered for 9 adolescent participants due to technological features that prevented analytics from tracking certain website data. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | Logins per week | Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
| Primary | Frequency of Use of App - Adult Caregiver Participants | Website usage metrics were captured by counting the number of website log-ins by parents/caregivers. | This outcome includes data from all Caregivers regardless of whether they were also named by a Youth as an Adult Support Participant. Frequency of app usage was gathered from 12 caregivers due to technological features that prevented analytics from tracking certain website data. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | Logins per week | Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
| Primary | Frequency of Use of App - Adult Support Participants | Website usage metrics were captured by counting the number of website log-ins by supporting adults. | This outcome includes data from all Adult Support Participants regardless of whether they were also a Youth's Adult Caregiver. Frequency of app usage was gathered from 39 Support Participants due to technological features that prevented analytics from tracking certain website data. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | Logins per week | Week 1, 4, 8, 12 |
|
|
|
| Primary | Duration of Use of App - Youth Participants | Website usage metrics were captured by measuring the duration of website use by adolescents. | Usage information was gathered for 9 adolescent participants due to technological features that prevented analytics from tracking certain website data. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | Minutes per week | Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
| Primary | Duration of Use of App - Adult Caregiver Participants | Website usage metrics were captured by measuring the duration of website use by parents/caregivers. | This outcome includes data from all Caregivers regardless of whether they were also named by a Youth Participant as an Adult Support Participant. Frequency of app usage was gathered from 12 caregivers due to technological features that prevented analytics from tracking certain website data. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | Minutes per week | Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
| Primary | Duration of Use of App - Adult Support Participants | Website usage metrics were captured by measuring the duration of website use by by support adults. | This outcome includes data from all Adult Support Participants regardless of whether they were also a Youth's Adult Caregiver. Frequency of app usage was gathered from 39 Support Participants due to technological features that prevented analytics from tracking certain website data. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | Minutes per Week | Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) - Youth Participants | Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher perceived intervention feasibility. Results reflect data from Youth Participants. | 1 youth participant was lost to follow up. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 4 Weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) - Adult Caregiver Participants | Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher perceived intervention feasibility. Results reflect data from Adult Caregiver Participants. | This outcome includes data from all Caregivers regardless of whether they were also named by a Youth Participant as an Adult Support Participant. 1 caregiver participant withdrew from the trial prior to data collection. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 4 Weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) - Adult Support Participants | Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher perceived intervention feasibility. Results reflect data from Adult Support Participants. | This outcome includes data from all Adult Support Participants regardless of whether they were also a Youth's Adult Caregiver. 6 support participants were lot to follow up or withdrew from the trial prior to data collection. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 8 Weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) - Youth Participants | Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher acceptability. Results reflect data from Youth Participants. | 1 youth participant was lost to follow up. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 4 Weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) - Adult Caregiver Participants | Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher acceptability. Results reflect data from Adult Caregiver Participants. | This outcome includes data from all Caregivers regardless of whether they were also named by a Youth Participant as an Adult Support Participant. 1 caregiver participant withdrew from the trial prior to data collection. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 4 Weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) - Adult Support Participants | Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher acceptability. Results reflect data from Adult Support Participants. | This outcome includes data from all Adult Support Participants regardless of whether they were also a Youth's Adult Caregiver. 6 support participants were lot to follow up or withdrew from the trial prior to data collection. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 8 Weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) - Youth Participants | Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher perceived intervention appropriateness. Results reflect data from Youth Participants. | 1 youth participant was lost to follow up. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 4 Weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) - Adult Caregiver Participants | Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher perceived intervention appropriateness. Results reflect data from Adult Caregiver Participants. | This outcome includes data from all Caregivers regardless of whether they were also named by a Youth Participant as an Adult Support Participant. 1 caregiver participant withdrew from the trial prior to data collection. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 4 Weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) - Adult Support Participants | Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree). Higher scores indicated higher perceived intervention appropriateness. Results reflect data from Adult Support Participants. | This outcome includes data from all Adult Support Participants regardless of whether they were also a Youth's Adult Caregiver. 6 support participants were lot to follow up or withdrew from the trial prior to data collection. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 8 Weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-I) - Youth Participants | The CSQ-I was a valid and reliable scale for measuring overall satisfaction with health and human services, including digital or internet-based intervention. This was adapted for use with youth, parents, and support adults. The adapted scales each had 8 items in a Likert scale ranging from 8-32 where higher numbers indicated higher satisfaction. Results reflect data from Youth Participants. | 1 youth participant was lost to follow up. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 4 Weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-I) - Adult Caregiver Participants | The CSQ-I was a valid and reliable scale for measuring overall satisfaction with health and human services, including digital or internet-based intervention. This was adapted for use with youth, parents, and support adults. The adapted scales each had 8 items in a Likert scale ranging from 8-32 where higher numbers indicated higher satisfaction. Results reflect data from Adult Caregiver Participants. | This outcome includes data from all Caregivers regardless of whether they were also named by a Youth Participant as an Adult Support Participant. 1 caregiver participant withdrew from the trial prior to data collection. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 4 Weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-I) - Adult Support Participants | The CSQ-I was a valid and reliable scale for measuring overall satisfaction with health and human services, including digital or internet-based intervention. This was adapted for use with youth, parents, and support adults. The adapted scales each had 8 items in a Likert scale ranging from 8-32 where higher numbers indicated higher satisfaction. Results reflect data from Adult Support Participants. | This outcome includes data from all Adult Support Participants regardless of whether they were also a Youth's Adult Caregiver. 6 support participants were lot to follow up or withdrew from the trial prior to data collection. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 8 Weeks |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 19 |
| 2 |
| 19 |
| 0 |
| 19 |
| Suicide Attempt | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
|
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Week 12 |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Week 12 |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Week 12 |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Week 12 |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Week 12 |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Week 12 |
|