Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of BG2109 administered orally once daily at a dose of 100 mg alone or of 200 mg in combination with add-back hormone replacement therapy (ABT: estradiol (E2) 1 mg / norethisterone acetate (NETA) 0.5 mg) versus placebo, while under randomized treatment, in the management of moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain (EAP) in chinese women with surgically confirmed endometriosis
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of BG2109 administered orally once daily at doses of 100 mg alone and 200 mg in combination with low dose ABT (E2 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg) versus placebo in the management of moderate to severe EAP in chinese women with surgically confirmed endometriosis.
The entire study is divided into the core stage and the extension stage, with a total duration of approximately 72 weeks. This includes the prescreening wash-out period (if applicable), screening period (approximately 5-8 weeks), core stage (24 weeks) and extension stage (28 weeks), and the safety follow-up period (approximately 12 weeks)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| BG2109 100 mg group | Experimental |
| |
| BG2109 200 mg +ABT group | Experimental |
| |
| Placebo group | Placebo Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BG2109 100mg | Drug | One tablet of BG2109 100mg , oral , once daily |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Dysmenorrhea (DYS) response rate at Week 12 | responders are defined as those with a significant decrease in mean DYS score measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse) compared to baseline, with decreased or stable analgesic use for EAP | Week 12 |
| Non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) response rate at Week 12 | responders are defined as those with a significant decrease in mean NMPP score measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse) compared to baseline, with decreased or stable analgesic use for EAP | Week 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change of the interference of pain with the ability to perform daily activities from the baseline at week 24 | measured using the pain dimension in Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30)(0-100, higher scores mean worse) | Week 24 |
| Change of the mean overall pelvic pain(OPP) score from the baseline at week 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change of mean pelvic pain scores of DYS from the baseline to each scheduled assessment | measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse) | during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64 |
| Change of mean pelvic pain scores of NMPP from the baseline to each scheduled assessment |
Key Inclusion Criteria:
The subject must be a premenopausal woman aged ≥18 years.
The subject must have had her most recent surgical and histological diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis (laparoscopy, laparotomy, vaginal fornix or other biopsy) within 10 years and at least 2 months ago prior to screening.
The subject has moderate to severe EAP during the screening period defined as:
i. Mean overall pelvic pain scores on the 0-10 NRS over the 5 days with the highest score ≥ 4; ii. At least two days with "moderate" or "severe" pain on the 0-3 VRS for pelvic pain over the days with uterine bleeding; iii. At least two days with "moderate" or "severe" pain on the 0-3 VRS for pelvic pain over the days without uterine bleeding;
The subject has a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 18 kg/m2 at the screening visit
Key Exclusion Criteria:
The subject is pregnant or breastfeeding, or plans to become pregnant during the study treatment period.
The subject has a surgical history of:
The subject may need to take prohibited medications during the study or in the stipulated time before screening
The subject has a contra-indication to ABT
The subject has chronic pelvic pain that, in the opinion of the Investigator, is not caused by endometriosis and requires chronic analgesic or other chronic therapy which would interfere with the assessment of EAP
The subject has conditions that affect bone mass density (BMD) assessment
The subject did not respond to prior treatment with GnRH agonists or GnRH antagonists for endometriosis
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin Kong | Contact | 021-58590032 | Kevin.Kong@Bio-Genuine.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Congjian Xu | Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University | Recruiting | Shanghai | China |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004715 | Endometriosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| BG2109 200mg |
| Drug |
One tablet of BG2109 200mg, oral , once daily. |
|
| ABT(E2 1 mg / NETA 0.5 mg) | Drug | One tablet of ABT(E2 1 mg / NETA 0.5 mg), oral, once-daily |
|
| BG2109 100mg Placebo | Drug | One tablet of BG2109 100mg Placebo, oral , once daily. |
|
| BG2109 200mg Placebo | Drug | One tablet of BG2109 200mg Placebo, oral , once daily. |
|
| ABT Placebo | Drug | One tablet of ABT Placebo, oral, once-daily |
|
measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse) |
| Week 24 |
| Change of the mean DYS score from the baseline at week 24 | measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse) | Week 24 |
| Change of the mean NMPP score from the baseline at week 24 | measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse) | Week 24 |
| Ratio of subjects who do not use analgesics to treat EAP at week 24 | Week 24 |
measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse) |
| during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64 |
| Change of mean pelvic pain scores of overall pelvic pain(OPP) from the baseline to each scheduled assessment | measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse) | during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64 |
| Change of mean scores of dyschezia from the baseline to each scheduled assessment | measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse) | during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64 |
| Change of mean scores of dyspareunia from the baseline to each scheduled assessment | measured using Verbal rating scale - VRS(0-3, higher scores mean worse) | during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64 |
| Change of the number of days with moderate to severe pelvic pain from the baseline to each scheduled assessment | measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse) | during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64 |
| Change of the number of days with uterine bleeding (including spotting) from the baseline to each scheduled assessment | measured using the uterine bleeding scale(0-3, higher scores mean worse) | during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64 |
| Change of the number of days of analgesic use (including any class) for EAP from the baseline to each scheduled assessment | during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64 |
| Change of the mean worst pelvic pain score defined as the mean of the 5 highest daily pain scores from the baseline to each scheduled assessment | measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse) | during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64 |
| Change of scores in the dimensions of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, self-image, and sexual relationships from the baseline to each scheduled assessment | measured using the EHP-30 core questionnaire(contains 5 dimensions:pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, self-image; all are 0-100 score, higher scores mean worse) and Module C(0-100 score, higher scores mean worse) | during the previous 28 days of Week 4,8,12,24,36,52,56,64 |
| Change of score of quality of life from the baseline to week 24 and week 52 | measured using SF-36v2 ® Health Survey (SF-36v2)(0-100 score, higher scores mean better ) | during the previous 28 days of Week 24,52, |
| Change of uterine size of a patient with concomitant adenomyosis from the baseline to week 12, week 24, and week 52 | Week 12,24,52 |
| Change of BMD on lumbar (L1-L4), femoral neck, and total hip from the baseline to week 24 and week 52 | measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) | Week 24,52 |
| Incidence and severity of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during treatment period | from first dose to Week 52 |
| Incidence and severity of hypoestrogenic TEAEs (vasomotor symptoms) | from first dose to Week 52 |
| Time to the first post-treatment menses | Week 56 or 64 |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |