Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Aerogen | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of ILAN is to assess the safety, feasibility and bronchodilator efficacy of in-line bronchodilator nebulizer delivery with VMN via HFNC system in hypoxemic respiratory failure patients treated with bronchodilators and compare this method to standard-nebulization using a jet nebulizer with a facial mask. The investigators hypothesized that aerosol nebulization using HFNC/VMN represents safer and more convenient approach in hypoxemic respiratory failure patients in comparison to conventional therapy while providing similar bronchodilator efficacy.
Objective: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of a novel approach to nebulization treatment via the nasal route in patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure dependent on high flow oxygen.
Hypothesis: In-line vibrating mesh nebulizer delivery via HFNC systems is a safe, feasible and efficacious approach in comparison to traditional jet nebulizer delivered nebulization in hypoxemic respiratory failure patients whose usual care includes nebulized drugs.
Specific Aims:
Study Design: ILAN is a double-crossover, multi-center trial evaluating the safety and feasibility of in line nebulized medication with high flow nasal canula in comparison to standard jet nebulizer therapy in acute respiratory failure requiring the utilization of high flow nasal cannula.
Intervention: Enrolled patients will receive two standard forms of inhaled medications as ordered by the physician. Patients will be randomized into two paths of the cross over study. There will be no blinding involved in this randomization. Path A will have medications delivered trans-nasally in line via the vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) with the high flow nasal cannula followed by standard jet nebulization (SJN) with face mask at the next time of medication dosing 3-6 hours later. Path B will receive standard jet nebulization without HFNC followed by the trans-nasal in line nebulization via the HFNC. Patients selected to enroll in day 2 of the trial will have their clinical path alternated in attempt to control for diurnal variability. All patients will also receive as-needed nebulized treatments as well as usual supportive care provided by respiratory therapists. As needed therapy will be delivered via the method of the current arm of the study they are in, and the washout period will subsequently reset.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Path A (vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) with the high flow nasal cannula) | Experimental | Enrolled patients will receive two standard forms of inhaled medications as ordered by the physician. Patients will be randomized into two paths of the cross over study. There will be no blinding involved in this randomization. Path A will have medications delivered trans-nasally in line via the vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) with the high flow nasal cannula followed by standard jet nebulization (SJN) with face mask at the next time of medication dosing 3-6 hours later. |
|
| Path B (standard jet nebulization (SJN) with face mask) | Active Comparator | Path B will receive standard jet nebulization without HFNC followed by the trans-nasal in line nebulization via the HFNC. Patients agreed to enroll in day 2 of the trial will have their clinical path alternated in attempt to control for diurnal variability. All patients will also receive as-needed nebulized treatments as well as usual supportive care provided by respiratory therapists. As needed therapy will be delivered via the method of the current arm of the study they are in, and the washout period will subsequently reset. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| nebulizer via in-line drug delivery maintaining high-flow nasal cannula oxygen | Device | nebulized delivery of bronchodilator via in-line drug delivery maintaining high-flow nasal cannula oxygen |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Maximal decrease in SpO2 during nebulization with jet nebulizer vs. inline via HFNC compared to the baseline SpO2 values prior to the nebulization therapy | Primary Outcome | up to 48 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of patients with documented hypoxemia (<88%) during the nebulization | Safety Outcome | up to 48 hours |
| Duration of hypoxemic episodes with SpO2<88% during the nebulization delivery | Safety Outcome |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Portion of patients able to complete the nebulization therapy | Feasibility Outcome | up to 48 hours |
| Patient satisfactory survey score | Feasibility Outcome: (5 question, 7-point scale ranging from very uncomfortable to very comfortable) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Igor Barjaktarevic, MD, PhD | University of California, Los Angeles | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald Reagan Medical Center at UCLA | Los Angeles | California | 90095 | United States | ||
| Santa Monica UCLA |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | 1. Rochwerg, B. Intensive Care Med, 2020 2. Li, J. Respir Care, 2021 3. Reminiac, F. Ann Intensive Care, 2018 4. Li, J. Crit Care, 2020. 5. Dugernier, J., J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv, 2019 6. Leung, C.C.H. J Hosp Infect, 2019 7. Reminiac, F., J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv, 2016 8. Berlinski, A. Respir Care, 2013 9. Ari, A., J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv, 2015 10. Ari, A., Respir Care, 2010 11. Alcoforado, L., Pharmaceutics, 2019 12. Bennett, G., Intensive Care Med Exp, 2019 13. Dugernier, J.,J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv, 2017 14. Zielinski, J., Chest, 1995 15. Ringbaek, T. and K. Viskum, Respir Med, 2003 16. Rezaie, N. J Res Med Sci, 2013 17. Rennard, S.I., Chest, 1996 18. Ogale, S.S., Chest, 2010 19. Drake, M.G., Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2018 20. Valencia-Ramos, J., Respir Care, 2018 |
Not provided
Not provided
as below
after the study completion, for 3 years
direct contact with the study team
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012131 | Respiratory Insufficiency |
| D000402 | Airway Obstruction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012120 | Respiration Disorders |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
HFNC with trans-nasal aerosol delivery is a multi-center trial comparing nebulization of medications via trans-nasal delivery with vibrating mesh nebulizer to standard jet nebulization in patients with mild or moderate hypoxemic respiratory failure (with or without acute hypercapnic respiratory failure) treated with HFNC. The crossover nature of the study is reflected in the universal application of bronchodilators via both study interventions (HFNC/VMN and FM/SJN) in all subjects but in variable order depending on the randomization of subjects into Path A or Path B
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| standard jet nebulization (SJN) with face mask | Device | standard jet nebulization delivery of bronchodilator |
|
| up to 48 hours |
| Lowest absolute desaturation from the beginning until completion of nebulizer treatment compared to the baseline SpO2 values defined as the lowest adequately measured SpO2 within two minutes prior to the nebulization | Safety Outcome | up to 48 hours |
| Increase in respiratory rate from the baseline during the nebulization by >10% | Safety Outcome | up to 48 hours |
| Change in respiratory rate during nebulization compared to the baseline rate | Safety Outcome | up to 48 hours |
| Requirement for additional interventions to maintain patient's safety during the nebulization | Safety Outcome: (Increased O2 flow (yes/know and rate increase) or increased O2 FiO2 (yes/know and rate increase) ) | up to 48 hours |
| Need to increase O2 support after the nebulization therapy to maintain SpO2>88% | Safety Outcome | up to 48 hours |
| Nosebleed within 2 hours of nebulizer delivery | Safety Outcome | up to 48 hours |
| ROX score | Safety Outcome (While not externally validated, the ROX Index is a simple bedside calculation using three clinical variables and is one easy way to summarize a patient's degree of hypoxemic respiratory failure - gives risk of intubation - low to high) | up to 48 hours |
| up to 48 hours |
| Modified BORG score | Safety Outcome (Introduced by Gunnar Borg, rates exertion on a scale of 6-20, from lowest to highest) | up to 48 hours |
| Compliance with the study protocol | Feasibility Outcome (number of study drug doses which are missed during the study period) | up to 48 hours |
| Duration of nebulizer delivery | Feasibility Outcome | up to 48 hours |
| Respiratory therapist time utilization as reflected in the total time spent delivering the nebulization in 2-minute increments | Feasibility Outcome | up to 48 hours |
| Santa Monica |
| California |
| 90404 |
| United States |