Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| INV-053846 | Other Grant/Funding Number | BMGF |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Groupe de Recherche Action en Sante | OTHER |
| Radboud University Medical Center | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Seasonal Malaria Chemoprophylaxis (SMC) is a fundamental component of malaria control. The SMC program involves that sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (SPAQ) is given to children below the age of 5 years during the peak transmission season in areas of seasonal malaria transmission. Yet, its efficacy is increasingly below expectations.
This study involves an Operational evaluation of a modified existing intervention and its implementation are prepared in direct interaction with the Ministry of Health (MoH) to tailor data collection to local needs. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will:
i) Compare SMC effectiveness as implemented by the national malaria control program and SMC implemented in a research context where all doses are directly observed.
ii) Quantify the infectious reservoir and the contribution of different age groups to transmission with conventional SMC (<5 years) and extended SMC (<10 years) iii) Determine the impact of drug resistance and drug absorption on SMC efficacy iv) Understand social barriers and enablers interfering with SMC efficacy and how SMC uptake is related to health equity with special attention to gender inequalities.
v) Quantify SMC efficacy decay under programmatic conditions and key drivers of this decay.
Seasonal Malaria Chemoprophylaxis is a well established method of malaria control. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (SPAQ) is given to children below the age of 5 years during the peak transmission season in areas of seasonal malaria transmission. Whilst highly effective in controlled research studies, the impact of SMC in terms of reducing infection prevalence is less following operational delivery. It is currently unclear why and what drivers of SMC coverage and uptake play a role. In addition, the relative importance of parasite drug resistance, limited adherence, poor drug absorption and frequent re-infections remain largely unexplored.
Lastly, the World Health Organization has recently widened the scope for SMC to target all vulnerable populations. The Ministry of Health (MoH) in Burkina Faso is considering extending SMC to all children below 10 years of age; the impact of SMC on clinical incidence and parasite prevalence in this population with markedly different immunity is unknown. Moreover, this older age group is known to be highly relevant for onward malaria transmission, making it important to quantify the impact of SMC on the human infectious reservoir for malaria and broader benefits to the community.
The investigators propose a cluster-randomized trial in Saponé Health District, Burkina Faso, with three study arms:
i. SMC in children under the age of 5 years, implemented by the MoH without directly observed treatment for the full course of SMC ii. SMC in children under the age of 5 years, with directly observed treatment for the full course of SMC iii. SMC in children under the age of 10 years, with directly observed treatment for the full course of SMC The investigators will deliver the different arms of the intervention to 40 clusters of 3 households/compounds (i.e. 120 compounds per arm). The primary endpoint is parasite prevalence at the end of the malaria transmission season, secondary endpoints include the impact of SMC on clinical incidence, gametocyte carriage and potential for onward parasite transmission to mosquitoes. As relevant factors in determining these efficacies, drivers of SMC uptake and treatment adherence will be determined, as well as drug concentrations, parasite resistance markers and transmission of parasites to mosquitoes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Active Comparator | SMC in children under the age of 5 years, implemented by the MoH without directly observed treatment for the full course of SMC |
|
| Arm 2 | Experimental | SMC in children under the age of 5 years, with directly observed treatment for the full course of SMC |
|
| Arm 3 | Experimental | SMC in children under the age of 10 years, with directly observed treatment for the full course of SMC |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seasonal Malaria Chemoprophylaxis (under 5 year old) implemented by the MoH without DOT | Other | Standard approach for SMC strategy used by the Ministry of Health (without directly-observed therapy) and without any interference of the study team. Implemented over 4 rounds, carried out in June-October 2023 with ~30 days between rounds. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Parasite prevalence by quantitative PCR (qPCR) at the end of the transmission season in age groups targeted by seasonal malaria chemoprevention. | This endpoint will be compared between arms 1 and 2 (in children aged 3-59 months) and arms 2 and arm 3 (in children aged 3 months-9 years). | 4 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Parasite prevalence by microscopy at the end of the transmission season in all age groups | This endpoint will compare the parasite prevalence in all age groups between intervention arms. | 4 weeks |
| Parasite prevalence by qPCR at the end of the transmission season in all age groups |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Infectivity to mosquitoes, defined as the percentage of infected mosquitoes, in relation to gametocyte density and plasma drug levels of AQ and DESAQ | This endpoint will assess the infectivity to mosquitoes between intervention arms related to gametocytemia and plasma drug levels. | Up to 10 weeks |
| Size and age-distribution of the infectious reservoir for malaria |
The study population will be derived from individuals aged 3 months to up to 10 years old eligible for SMC.
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alfred Tiono, PhD, MD | Groupe de Recherche Action en Sante | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groupe de Recherche Action en Santé | Ouagadougou | Burkina Faso |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38479748 | Derived | Moreno M, Barry A, Gmeiner M, Yaro JB, Serme SS, Byrne I, Ramjith J, Ouedraogo A, Soulama I, Grignard L, Soremekun S, Koele S, Ter Heine R, Ouedraogo AZ, Sawadogo J, Sanogo E, Ouedraogo IN, Hien D, Sirima SB, Bradley J, Bousema T, Drakeley C, Tiono AB. Understanding and maximising the community impact of seasonal malaria chemoprevention in Burkina Faso (INDIE-SMC): study protocol for a cluster randomised evaluation trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 12;14(3):e081682. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081682. |
Not provided
Not provided
Anonymised individual participant data may be shared on a digital repository or upon reasonable request.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 29, 2024 | Nov 1, 2024 |
Not provided
This study involves and Operational evaluation of a modified existing intervention delivered in independent clusters. The project and its implementation are prepared in direct interaction with the Ministry of Health (MoH) to tailor data collection to local needs.
Not provided
Not provided
Laboratory analysis and impact analysis teams will be blinded to intervention arm.
Entomology staff involved in the mosquito feeding assays will be blinded for the parasitology results.
Not provided
|
| Seasonal Malaria Chemoprophylaxis (under 5 years old) with DOT | Other | SMC will be implemented with the same number of rounds and the same timing as in active comparator arm but village health workers will visit the participants at home to administer each dose of study treatment (with DOT-directly-observed therapy) |
|
| Seasonal Malaria Chemoprophylaxis (under 10 years old) with DOT | Other | SMC will be implemented as in arm 2 but age of participants is extended up to 10 years: each dose of study treatment (with DOT-directly-observed therapy) distributed at home by village health workers. |
|
This endpoint will compare the parasite prevalence in all age groups between intervention arms. |
| 4 weeks |
| Parasite prevalence by microscopy prior to SMC rounds 2, 3 and 4 in SMC-targeted age groups | This endpoint will compare the prevalence by microscopy before SMC rounds (2, 3 and 4) between intervention arms. | 8 weeks |
| Rate of re-infection with P. falciparum at weeks 3, 4 and 5 after the last round of SMC, assessed in SMC-targeted age groups | This endpoint will assess the rate of malaria reinfection at different time points after the alst round of SMC between intervention arms | 10 weeks |
| Gametocyte prevalence by qRT-PCR at weeks 3, 4 and 5 after the last round of SMC, assessed in SMC-targeted age groups | This endpoint will compare the gametocyte prevalence between intervention arms at different time points after the last round of SMC. | 10 weeks |
| Gametocyte prevalence by qRT-PCR at the end of the transmission season in all age groups | This endpoint will compare the gametocyte prevalence between intervention arms in all age groups | 8 weeks |
| Plasma levels of AQ and DESAQ after the 4th round of SMC in children aged 3 months-9 years | This endpoint will compare the plasma levels of AQ and DESAQ between intervention arms. | 6 weeks |
| Clinical malaria incidence captured during passive-case detection (between arm comparison) | This endpoint will compare the cases of malaria between intervention arms. | Across study period (6 months) |
| Parasite prevalence by qPCR at the end of the transmission season compared between arms 1 and combined arms 2 + 3. | This endpoint will assess the prevalence in targeted age groups in combined arms with similar treatment and population | 4 weeks |
| Gametocyte prevalence by qRT-PCR at the end of the transmission season in age groups targeted by SMC (comparison between arm1 and 2 (in children aged 3-59 months) and arms 2 and arm 3 (in children aged 5 years-9 years). | This endpoint will assess the gametocyte prevalence and the end of the study between groups and combined similar groups. | 4 weeks |
This endpoint will assess the likelihood that a mosquito becomes infected with malaria parasites after feeding on a population member (between arm comparison) |
| Through study completion, an average of 10 months |
| Prevalence of drug resistance markers in infected children aged 3 months-9 years assessed post each round of SMC (between arm comparison) | This endpoint will assess the prevalence of drug resistance markers after each round of SMC. | Through study completion, an average of 10 months |
| Description of perceived social barriers to SMC uptake | This endpoint is designed to understand potential factors that influence SMC uptake and effectiveness | Through study completion, an average of 10 months |
| Quantification of SMC efficacy decay under programmatic conditions | This endpoint will assess the practical realities that result in reduction of SMC coverage. | Through study completion, an average of 10 months |
| SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008288 | Malaria |
| D016778 | Malaria, Falciparum |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011528 | Protozoan Infections |
| D010272 | Parasitic Diseases |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D000096724 | Mosquito-Borne Diseases |
| D000079426 | Vector Borne Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided