Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
One approach to improve the efficiency of the drug development process is the use of human 'immune challenge' studies. In these studies, healthy volunteers are given small amounts of substances which are foreign to their immune system to provoke a temporary response: the 'challenge'. Depending on the nature and dose of the challenge, the body's immune system will react in a different but predictable way, elements of which mimic those seen in disease, thereby 'modelling' them. These models can help safely bridge the gap between animal experiments and patient groups and, if sufficiently understood, test the effect of new drugs without exposing patients to risk. Sadly, whilst immune challenge models have been used in drug development for many years, this has been done in a largely non-standardised, ad hoc manner, which greatly limits the usefulness of the approach.
The purpose of this research is to better understand, improve, and standardise a common method of immune challenge which uses a protein called 'Keyhole Limpet Haemocyanin' (KLH). KLH is available as a highly-purified formulation, and because it is not usually encountered by the human immune system (it is derived from an inedible shellfish), it allows us to study the development of immune responses right from the time it is administered. We plan to give different groups of healthy volunteers different doses of KLH with or without an 'immune-boosting' agent (Alhydrogelâ„¢ or Montanide ISAâ„¢51, commonly referred to as adjuvants), before measuring and comparing their response. We will then re-challenge all the volunteers a month later by injecting different doses of KLH into the skin on their forearms, similar to an allergy test, taking images, blood samples and skin biopsies to understand the nature, time course, and variability of the immune response in each individual. No previous studies have directly explored the effects of KLH dose or adjuvants in a rigorous manner. The results will help us to determine both whether administering KLH with different adjuvants elicits qualitatively different immune response profiles (thus modelling different diseases) and the optimal doses of KLH to evaluate new drugs with. In turn, we hope this will help improve the percentage of drugs progressing from concept to clinical therapy, addressing unmet health needs.
This is a single blind, parallel group, two-phase challenge study to determine the relative immunogenicity of subunit KLH, with and without aluminium hydroxide adjuvant, in healthy UK volunteers aged 18-45. The prime dose of subunit KLH (+/- aluminium hydroxide or Montanide ISA-51) will be administered IM, and the re-challenge dose of subunit KLH for assessment of DTH will be administered ID.
This trial will be conducted at a Clinical Research Facility based at the University of Oxford supporting researchers from Oxford University Joint Research Office (JRO) approved research.
There will be 7 randomised study groups (plus one non-randomised 'blood sample only' group, group 8 - see section 8.6) and it is anticipated that a maximum of 39 volunteers will be enrolled (excluding dropouts). Eligible participants will be randomised into any of 7 study groups (section 7.1) according to study phase. Randomisation and enrolment will occur in two phases. Phase 1 will consist of group 1 (placebo prime dose) and the standard (1000mcg) KLH dose +/- adjuvant groups (2, 3, and 4). Following interim analysis of data from these 21 participants, recruitment into Phase 2 (the lower [10mcg] KLH dose groups: groups 5,6,7) will occur provided there is sufficient evidence of immunogenicity in the standard dose group.
Should participants withdraw or dropout of the study, replacement volunteers will be enrolled to ensure the target number of participants per group is achieved with all participants competing the full follow-up period. A maximum of 6 additional volunteers may be sought for this purpose.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1: Saline 0.9% (placebo) primary dose | Placebo Comparator | IM saline 0.9% (placebo) day 0, followed by multi-dose ID subunit KLH (0 mcg (saline), 1 mcg, 3 mcg, 10mcg, 30mcg, 100mcg) day 28 |
|
| Group 2: subunit KLH 1000mcg primary dose | Active Comparator | IM dose subunit KLH 1000 mcg day 0, followed by multi-dose ID subunit KLH (0 mcg (saline), 1 mcg, 3 mcg, 10mcg, 30mcg, 100mcg) day 28 |
|
| Group 3: subunit KLH 1000mcg plus aluminium hydroxide adjuvant 900mcg primary dose | Active Comparator | IM dose subunit KLH 1000 mcg plus aluminium hydroxide 900mcg day 0, followed by multi-dose ID subunit KLH (0 mcg (saline), 1 mcg, 3 mcg, 10mcg, 30mcg, 100mcg) day 28 |
|
| Group 4: subunit KLH 1000mcg plus Montanide ISA-51 primary dose | Active Comparator | IM dose subunit KLH 1000 mcg plus Montanide ISA-51 day 0, followed by multi-dose ID subunit KLH (0 mcg (saline), 1 mcg, 3 mcg, 10mcg, 30mcg, 100mcg) day 28 |
|
| Group 5: subunit KLH 10mcg primary dose | Active Comparator |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keyhole-Limpet Hemocyanin | Biological | Sub-unit Keyhole Limpet Haemocyanin (KLH, Immucothel, Biosyn, Fellbach, Germany) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To establish the immunogenicity of subunit KLH at different doses, with and without aluminium hydroxide or Montanide ISA-51 adjuvants | Proportion of participants with >2-fold increase over baseline (D0) in anti-KLH IgG antibody titre by ELISA in each group | Day 28 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Determine whether different doses of subunit KLH, with and without aluminium hydroxide or Montanide ISA-51 adjuvants, elicit predominantly TH1, TH2 or balanced responses | Ratio of TH1:TH2 antigen responsive cells based on number of IFN- γ (TH1) and IL-4 (TH2) producing PBMCs (cells per 10^6 PBMC) in response to KLH stimulation by ELISpot in each group. | Day 28 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oxford University RGEA | Contact | 01865 (6)16491 | rgea.sponsor@admin.ox.ac.uk |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| James Fullerton, MBBS | NDORMS, University of Oxford | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIHR Oxford Experimental Medicine Clinical Research Facility | Recruiting | Oxford | OX37LE | United Kingdom |
Only non-identifiable data anonymised to the ICO Anonymisation: managing data protection risk code of practice generated in this study will be suitable for sharing. We will adhere to the MRC's policy on data sharing.
ORA-data offers a means for Oxford's researchers to openly share non-confidential research data, without the need for external data users to undergo authentication. Each deposit is accompanied by appropriate metadata and is assigned a unique Digital Object Identifier (DOI) via the DataCite scheme, allowing it to be cited in publications. Directions to key datasets will also be made available via the group's web page on the Institute's web site. Appropriate metadata will be published with research data to enable other researchers to identify whether the data could be suitable for their own research.
Not provided
The study team will have exclusive use of the data for a reasonable period of time following the completion of the study in order to complete analysis and secure publication of results.
As per MRC Policy and Guidance on Sharing of Research Data from Population and Patient Studies and the Oxford University Data Sharing Policy, any external users will be required to agree to terms set out in an Oxford University Data Sharing Agreement. The agreement will outline their responsibilities and will prohibit any attempt to identify study participants, breach confidentiality or make unapproved contact with study participants.
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C032808 | keyhole-limpet hemocyanin |
| D012965 | Sodium Chloride |
| D000077330 | Saline Solution |
| C477385 | montanide ISA 51 |
| D000536 | Aluminum Hydroxide |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002712 | Chlorides |
| D006851 | Hydrochloric Acid |
| D017606 | Chlorine Compounds |
| D007287 | Inorganic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
Parallel group randomised experimental medicine study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
IM dose subunit KLH 10 mcg day 0, followed by multi-dose ID subunit KLH (0 mcg (saline), 1 mcg, 3 mcg, 10mcg, 30mcg, 100mcg) day 28
|
| Group 6: subunit KLH 10mcg plus aluminium hydroxide adjuvant 900mcg primary dose | Active Comparator | IM dose subunit KLH 10 mcg plus aluminium hydroxide 900mcg day 0, followed by multi-dose ID subunit KLH (0 mcg (saline), 1 mcg, 3 mcg, 10mcg, 30mcg, 100mcg) day 28 |
|
| Group 7: subunit KLH 10mcg plus Montanide ISA-51 primary dose | Active Comparator | IM dose subunit KLH 10 mcg plus Montanide ISA-51 day 0, followed by multi-dose ID subunit KLH (0 mcg (saline), 1 mcg, 3 mcg, 10mcg, 30mcg, 100mcg) day 28 |
|
| Group 8: Blood-sample only group (non-randomised) | No Intervention | No challenge agent, blood sampling only. |
|
| Saline | Drug | Placebo intervention. |
|
|
| Montanide ISA 51 VG | Drug | Montanide ISA-51 (Seppic, France) is a water-in-oil vaccine adjuvant |
|
|
| Alhydrogel | Drug | Alhydrogel is a vaccine adjuvant |
|
|
| Within-participant dose-response to intradermal KLH on day Day 28: skin induration response (EC50) | Intradermal KLH dose required for 50 percent of maximal induration response (EC50, measured in mm) | Day 30 (48 hours after Day 28 KLH re-challenge) |
| Within-participant dose-response to intradermal KLH on day Day 28: skin induration response (Emax) | Maximal induration response to intradermal KLH dose (Emax, measured in mm) | Day 30 (48 hours after Day 28 KLH re-challenge) |
| Within-participant dose-response to intradermal KLH on day Day 28: skin erythema response (EC50) | Intradermal KLH dose required for 50 percent of maximal erythema response (EC50, measured in mm) | Day 30 (48 hours after Day 28 KLH re-challenge) |
| Within-participant dose-response to intradermal KLH on day Day 28: skin erythema response (Emax) | Maximal erythema response to intradermal KLH dose (Emax, measured in mm) | Day 30 (48 hours after Day 28 KLH re-challenge) |
| D017670 |
| Sodium Compounds |
| D000077324 | Crystalloid Solutions |
| D007552 | Isotonic Solutions |
| D012996 | Solutions |
| D004364 | Pharmaceutical Preparations |
| D006878 | Hydroxides |
| D000468 | Alkalies |
| D017607 | Aluminum Compounds |
| D000838 | Anions |
| D007477 | Ions |
| D004573 | Electrolytes |