Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Selecting the right technique for lower limb soft tissue reconstruction is a therapeutic challenge. Despite having several reconstruction options, it's important to choose a technique that is effective and with the least possible donor site morbidity for the patient.
Objective: demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy of the medial tab flap in soft tissue reconstruction on the leg, compared to conventional flaps.
Materials and methods: Cohort study matched with Propensity Score Matching (PSM) by age. 64 patients with soft tissue defects were selected and followed up to one year postoperatively. Outcome variables: surgical time in minutes, healing, healing time in days, complications.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | 18 patients treated with medial tab-type fasciocutaneous flaps |
| |
| Control group | 46 patients were randomly chosen, through Propensity Score Matching (PSM) the matching was performed with the age variable. The types of flaps considered were: 15 cases with sural flap, 18 with soleus flap, and 13 with a gastrocnemius flap |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medial tab-type fasciocutaneous flap | Procedure | The flap can be taken in different ways depending on the defect. Once the base of the flap is identified, the posterior edge of the tibia is taken as reference; marking of the tab is performed considering that the posterior incision is located 5 cm from the posterior edge of the tibia, and the anterior incision is located longitudinally of the medial region of the tibial diaphysis, the length of the incision depends on the base of the flap and the defect's size. The posterior incision is made first in the skin, subcutaneous cellular tissue until the fascia is identified; the subfascial flap is dissected to avoid injuring perforators, dissection is completed up to the anterior edge of the flap, if needed direct cutaneous perforators are ligated; once the subfascial plane has been identified and dissected, the tab is completed in its proximal or distal part according to the previous surgical planning. Later, the tab is rotated to the anterior region of the tibia to cover the defect. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Differences in surgical and healing time between medial tab flaps and conventional flaps | This information was taken from he Sculapio software clinical records, the surgical time was measured in minutes from the moment of the incision to the clousure of the surgical planes, and the healing time was measured in days from the immediate postoperative period until the wound epithelization | January 2019 - December 2022 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics | The data collection was made from the Sculapio software clinical records of the Fundacion Campbell | January 2019 - December 2022 |
| Complications | The complications were descripted from the clinic history recorded by the orthopedic surgeon specialist, the following pathologies were taken into account: necrosis, suture dehiscence, fistula, foreign body granuloma, enlargement of the defect and infection. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 216 patients with soft tissue defects on the anterior aspect of the leg underwent surgery during the study period, of these 18 patients were treated with medial tab-type fasciocutaneous flaps, this group constituted the intervention group. 198 underwent surgery with conventional flaps, of which 46 patients were randomly chosen, through Propensity Score Matching (PSM) the matching was performed with the age variable. The types of flaps considered were: 15 cases with sural flap, 18 with soleus flap, and 13 with a gastrocnemius flap
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fundacion Campbell | Barranquilla | Atlántico | 080001 | Colombia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30078900 | Background | Singh A, Jiong Hao JT, Wei DT, Liang CW, Murphy D, Thambiah J, Han CY. Gustilo IIIB Open Tibial Fractures: An Analysis of Infection and Nonunion Rates. Indian J Orthop. 2018 Jul-Aug;52(4):406-410. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_369_16. | |
| Background | Parrett Brian M, Pribaz Julian J. Reconstrucción de extremidad inferior. Rev Médica ClÃnica Las Condes. 2010;21(1):76-85 | ||
| Background | RodrÃguez Lara JN, Ochoa Fletes MP. Serie de casos: colgajo sóleo-gastrocnemio en pacientes con defectos de partes blandas en miembros inferiores. Rev Med Hondur. 2021;89(2):131-6 | ||
| Background | Martinov M, Argirova M. Fasciocutaneous flaps in the lower limb soft tissue reconstruction - A surgical case series. Orthoplastic Surg [Internet]. 2022;9(May):1-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orthop.2022.05.002 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| January 2019 - December 2022 |
| 21292931 | Background | Friedrich JB, Katolik LI, Hanel DP. Reconstruction of soft-tissue injury associated with lower extremity fracture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Feb;19(2):81-90. doi: 10.5435/00124635-201102000-00003. |
| Background | Vergara-amador E. El uso de colgajos en la reconstrucción de defectos de cobertura en la pierna distal y dorso de pie The use of flaps in the reconstruction of defects of coverage in the distal leg and dorsum of the foots. 2013;29(1):74-82. |
| 35101259 | Background | MacKechnie MC, Flores MJ, Giordano V, Terry MJ, Garuz M, Lee N, Padilla Rojas LG, MacKechnie MA, Bidolegui F, Brown K, Quintero JE, Ding A, Sanchez Valenciano CG, Tabares Neyra H, Segovia J, Aguilar D, van Lieshout EM, Verhofstad MH, Miclau T. Management of soft-tissue coverage of open tibia fractures in Latin America: Techniques, timing, and resources. Injury. 2022 Apr;53(4):1422-1429. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.01.027. Epub 2022 Jan 19. |
| 3567445 | Background | Taylor GI, Palmer JH. The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg. 1987 Mar;40(2):113-41. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(87)90185-8. |
| 16799395 | Background | Attinger CE, Evans KK, Bulan E, Blume P, Cooper P. Angiosomes of the foot and ankle and clinical implications for limb salvage: reconstruction, incisions, and revascularization. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Jun;117(7 Suppl):261S-293S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000222582.84385.54. |
| Background | Concha JM, Camaro PL, David A, Concha C. The lateral supramalleolar flap for the treatment of open foot and ankle fractures. Orthoplastic Surg [Internet]. 2022;9(May):80-5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orthop.2022.07.006 |
| 31456612 | Background | Mahajan RK, Srinivasan K, Singh M, Jain A, Kapadia T, Tambotra A. Management of Post-Traumatic Composite Bone and Soft Tissue Defect of Leg. Indian J Plast Surg. 2019 Jan;52(1):45-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688097. Epub 2019 May 8. |
| 32912022 | Background | Luo Z, Dong Z, Ni J, Wei J, Peng P, Lv G. Distally Based Peroneal Artery Perforator-Plus Fasciocutaneous Flap to Reconstruct Soft Tissue Defect Combined With Chronic Osteomyelitis in the Lateral Malleolus. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2022 Dec;21(4):464-470. doi: 10.1177/1534734620956782. Epub 2020 Sep 11. |
| 16876082 | Background | Akhtar S, Hameed A. Versatility of the sural fasciocutaneous flap in the coverage of lower third leg and hind foot defects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(8):839-45. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.12.009. Epub 2006 Mar 9. |
| 28352601 | Background | Economides JM, DeFazio MV, Golshani K, Cinque M, Anghel EL, Attinger CE, Evans KK. Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Following Pedicled Muscle versus Fasciocutaneous Flap Coverage for Complex Periprosthetic Wounds in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty. Arch Plast Surg. 2017 Mar;44(2):124-135. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.2.124. Epub 2017 Mar 15. |
| 16425121 | Background | Zweifel-Schlatter M, Haug M, Schaefer DJ, Wolfinger E, Ochsner P, Pierer G. Free fasciocutaneous flaps in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis of the tibia: a retrospective study. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2006 Jan;22(1):41-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-931906. |
| 32229743 | Background | Roberts HJ, DeSilva GL. Can Sural Fasciocutaneous Flaps Be Effective in Patients Older Than 65? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Apr;478(4):734-738. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000963. |
| 24957508 | Background | Dhamangaonkar AC, Patankar HS. Reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap with a cutaneous pedicle to cover distal lower limb soft tissue defects: experience of 109 clinical cases. J Orthop Traumatol. 2014 Sep;15(3):225-9. doi: 10.1007/s10195-014-0304-0. Epub 2014 Jun 24. |
| 6673085 | Background | Donski PK, Fogdestam I. Distally based fasciocutaneous flap from the sural region. A preliminary report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;17(3):191-6. doi: 10.3109/02844318309013118. |
| 3730678 | Background | Wee JT. Reconstruction of the lower leg and foot with the reverse-pedicled anterior tibial flap: preliminary report of a new fasciocutaneous flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1986 Jul;39(3):327-37. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(86)90042-1. |
| 9326145 | Background | Erdmann MW, Court-Brown CM, Quaba AA. A five year review of islanded distally based fasciocutaneous flaps on the lower limb. Br J Plast Surg. 1997 Sep;50(6):421-7. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(97)90329-5. |
| 17369010 | Background | Bullocks JM, Hickey RM, Basu CB, Hollier LH, Kim JY. Single-stage reconstruction of Achilles tendon injuries and distal lower extremity soft tissue defects with the reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(5):566-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.01.017. Epub 2007 Mar 26. |