Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Vrije Universiteit Brussel | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary objective of the study is to examine whether there is a difference in disability after 12 months of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2 (PSPS T2) after receiving a standardized pain medication tapering protocol before SCS implantation, a personalized pain medication tapering protocol before SCS implantation, or no tapering protocol before SCS implantation. The secondary objective of the study is to examine whether there is a difference after 12 months of SCS in PSPS T2 patients after receiving a standardized pain medication tapering protocol before SCS implantation, a personalized pain medication tapering protocol before SCS implantation, or no tapering protocol before SCS implantation on pain intensity, health-related quality of life, participation, domains affected by substance use, anxiety and depression, medication use, psychological constructs, sleep, central sensitization, and healthcare expenditure.
Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type II (PSPS T2) is a condition in which patients are suffering from persistent low back pain, despite previously performed surgical interventions. One way to help patients to alleviate their pain, is with Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS). SCS is able to provide pain relief and a decrease in disability but also to decrease the amount of pain medication and more specifically opioid intake. Nevertheless, the number of patients that can eventually totally omit the use of opioids is rather limited.
In this trial, we will investigate the effect of a pain medication tapering program before starting the SCS trajectory as the new treatment strategy for patients implanted with SCS. This allows us to tackle the high burden of patients that are taking a lot of pain medication by proceeding towards a more logical treatment plan for a costly and debilitating condition.
A three-arm multicenter randomized controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate whether there is a difference in disability (primary outcome) after 12 months of SCS in PSPS T2 patients after receiving a standardized pain medication tapering protocol before SCS implantation, a personalized pain medication tapering protocol before SCS implantation, or no tapering protocol before SCS implantation. Two different pain medication tapering programs (standardized versus personalized tapering) will be evaluated in this project. Pain medication tapering will be provided to 130 patients during a hospital stay, compared to 65 patients who do not undergo pain medication tapering before SCS implantation. Besides disability as primary outcome measure, several secondary outcome measurements will be collected namely pain intensity, health-related quality of life, participation, domains affected by substance use, anxiety and depression, medication use, psychological constructs, sleep, central sensitization and health expenditure. Outcome measurements will be collected at baseline, and after 1 month, 3, 6 and 12 months of SCS.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| No pain medication tapering (usual care) | Active Comparator | Usual care |
|
| Standardized pain medication tapering | Active Comparator | Standardized pain medication tapering |
|
| Personalized pain medication tapering | Active Comparator | Personalized pain medication tapering |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usual care | Procedure | Usual care with respect to Spinal Cord Stimulation implantation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Disability | Disability, evaluated with the Oswestry Disability Index | The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain intensity | Pain intensity will be evaluated using a Visual Analogue Scale (100 mm). | The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation. |
| Health-related Quality of Life |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maarten Moens, Prof, Dr. | Contact | +3224775514 | stimulusresearchgroup@gmail.com | |
| Lisa Goudman, Prof, Dr. | Contact | +3224775514 | stimulusresearchgroup@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel | Recruiting | Jette | 1090 | Belgium |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39133680 | Derived | Moens M, Crunelle CL, Putman K, Wuyts E, Bultinck F, Van Puyenbroeck H; PIANISSIMO consortium; Goudman L. Pain medication tapering for patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type II, treated with Spinal Cord Stimulation: A RCT-study protocol of the PIANISSIMO study. PLoS One. 2024 Aug 12;19(8):e0302842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302842. eCollection 2024. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Both the outcome assessors as well as the investigator (statistician) will be blinded.
| Standardized pain medication tapering | Procedure | A standardized pain medication tapering program before Spinal Cord Stimulator implantation. |
|
| Personalized pain medication tapering | Procedure | A personalized pain medication tapering program before Spinal Cord Stimulator implantation. |
|
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the Euro Quality of Life with five dimensions and five levels. |
| The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation. |
| Participation | The Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire is used to evaluate participation. | The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation. |
| Drug related patient characteristics and problems | The Measurements in the Addictions for Triage and Evaluation is used assess drug related patient characteristics and problems. | The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation. |
| Opioid craving | Opioid craving will be assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale for Opioid Craving. | The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation. |
| Risk for aberrant medication-related behaviour | The Current Opioid Misuse Measure is used to evaluate the risk for aberrant medication-related behaviour. | The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation. |
| Medication use | The Medication Quantification Scale III is used to quantify pain medication use. | The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation. |
| Healthcare utilization | Healthcare utilization is investigated by two means: expenditures associated with in-hospital care are inventoried using the hospital claims data whereas other costs are collected through self-reported (diaries and questionnaires). | The change in healthcare utilization starting from the baseline screening up to 12 months after the intervention. |
| Anxiety and depression | The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale is used to assess feelings of anxiety and depression. | The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation. |
| General Self-Efficacy | Perceived self-efficacy is evaluated using the General Self-Efficacy Scale. | The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation. |
| Pain Catastrophizing | With the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, catastrophizing thoughts or feelings accompanying the previously experienced pain are evaluated. | The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation. |
| Coping | The Multidimensional Pain Inventory is used to assess the participants coping strategy profile. | The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation. |
| Sleep quality | The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index is used to assess sleep quality. | The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation. |
| Symptoms of Central Sensitization | To assess symptoms associated with central sensitization, the Central Sensitization Inventory is used. | The change between the baseline assessment and the evaluation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation. |
| Heilig Hart Ziekenhuis Lier | Not yet recruiting | Lier | 2500 | Belgium |
|
| AZ Delta | Recruiting | Roeselare | 8800 | Belgium |
|