The investigators will use the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D). This is a 20-item scale widely used with ADRD participants. Response options range from 0 to 3 for each item (0 = Rarely or None of the Time, 1 = Some or Little of the Time, 2 = Moderately or Much of the time, 3 = Most or Almost All the Time) In scoring the CES-D, possible range of scores is 0 to 60, with the higher scores indicating the presence of more symptomatology.

The investigators will use the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) to assess caregivers mindfulness based on 5 subscales (observing, describing, awareness, non-judging, non-reactivity). Average scores are calculated by summing the responses and dividing by the number of items, and indicate the average level of agreement with the each subscale (1 = rarely true, 5 = always true). Higher scores are indicative of someone who is more mindful in their everyday life. Its facet scores range from 3-15.

The investigators will use the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) to assess caregivers mindfulness based on 5 subscales (observing, describing, awareness, non-judging, non-reactivity). Average scores are calculated by summing the responses and dividing by the number of items, and indicate the average level of agreement with the each subscale (1 = rarely true, 5 = always true). Higher scores are indicative of someone who is more mindful in their everyday life. Its facet scores range from 3-15.

The investigators will use the Perceived Stress Scale 10 (PSS-10) to assess perceived stress using a 5-point Likert scale.

Scoring Instructions: Total score is determined by adding together the scores of each of the four items. Questions 2 and 3 are reverse coded. Questions 1 and 4: 0 = Never; 1 = Almost never; 2 = Sometimes; 3 = Fairly often; 4 = Very often Questions 2 and 3: 4 = Never; 3 = Almost never; 2 = Sometimes; 1 = Fairly often; 0 = Very often.

Scores range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating more stress.

The investigators will use the Perceived Stress Scale 10 (PSS-10) to assess perceived stress using a 5-point Likert scale.

Scoring Instructions: Total score is determined by adding together the scores of each of the four items. Questions 2 and 3 are reverse coded. Questions 1 and 4: 0 = Never; 1 = Almost never; 2 = Sometimes; 3 = Fairly often; 4 = Very often Questions 2 and 3: 4 = Never; 3 = Almost never; 2 = Sometimes; 1 = Fairly often; 0 = Very often.

Scores range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating more stress.

The investigators will use State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) state subscales (20 items) to assess anxiety symptoms in response to stressful situations. STA has been successfully used with ADRD participants.

The range of possible scores varies from a minimum score of 20 to a maximum score of 80. STAI scores are commonly classified as "no or low anxiety" (20-37), "moderate anxiety" (38-44), and "high anxiety" (45-80).

The investigators will use State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) state subscales (20 items) to assess anxiety symptoms in response to stressful situations. STA has been successfully used with ADRD participants.

The range of possible scores varies from a minimum score of 20 to a maximum score of 80. STAI scores are commonly classified as "no or low anxiety" (20-37), "moderate anxiety" (38-44), and "high anxiety" (45-80).

The Self-Compassion Scale - Short Form (SCS-SF) is a 12-item self-report measure that is used by adults to measure their capacity for self-compassion - the ability to hold one's feelings of suffering with a sense of warmth, connection and concern. Self-Kindness Items: 2, 6 Self-Judgment Items (Reverse Scored): 11, 12 Common Humanity Items: 5, 10 Isolation Items: 4, 8 Mindfulness Items: 3, 7 Over-identification Items : 1, 9 = max score of 8 per category

The Self-Compassion Scale - Short Form (SCS-SF) is a 12-item self-report measure that is used by adults to measure their capacity for self-compassion - the ability to hold one's feelings of suffering with a sense of warmth, connection and concern. Self-Kindness Items: 2, 6 Self-Judgment Items (Reverse Scored): 11, 12 Common Humanity Items: 5, 10 Isolation Items: 4, 8 Mindfulness Items: 3, 7 Over-identification Items : 1, 9 = max score of 8 per category

The Compassion Scale (CS) has 16 items assessing common humanity, kindness toward others and ability to understand the suffering or challenges of others. Kindness items: 2, 6, 10, 14 Common Humanity items: 4, 8, 12, 16 Mindfulness items: 1, 5, 9, 13 Indifference items (reverse scored): 3, 7, 11, 15. Subscale scores are computed by calculating the mean of the four subscale item responses. To compute a total compassion score, reverse score the indifference items then take a grand mean of all items. When examining subscale scores, higher scores on indifference items indicate less compassion before reverse-coding, and more compassion after reverse coding. Participants can choose to report indifference scores with or without reverse-coding, but items must be reverse coded before calculating a total compassion score.

The Compassion Scale (CS) has 16 items assessing common humanity, kindness toward others and ability to understand the suffering or challenges of others. Kindness items: 2, 6, 10, 14 Common Humanity items: 4, 8, 12, 16 Mindfulness items: 1, 5, 9, 13 Indifference items (reverse scored): 3, 7, 11, 15. Subscale scores are computed by calculating the mean of the four subscale item responses. To compute a total compassion score, reverse score the indifference items then take a grand mean of all items. When examining subscale scores, higher scores on indifference items indicate less compassion before reverse-coding, and more compassion after reverse coding. Participants can choose to report indifference scores with or without reverse-coding, but items must be reverse coded before calculating a total compassion score.

This scale measures how confident participants are that they can keep up with their own activities and also respond to caregiving situations. There are 10 questions, rated 0 to 100, where 0 is not confident at all and 100 is very confident. The score is calculated by standardizing each score from 0-10 and summing the total. A 0 is the minimum, meaning not confident, and 100 is the maximum, meaning very confident.

This scale measures how confident participants are that they can keep up with their own activities and also respond to caregiving situations. There are 10 questions, rated 0 to 100, where 0 is not confident at all and 100 is very confident. The score is calculated by standardizing each score from 0-10 and summing the total. A 0 is the minimum, meaning not confident, and 100 is the maximum, meaning very confident.

The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) 3-item loneliness scale assess relational connectedness, social connectedness and self-perceived isolation.

The scores for each individual question can be added together to give participants a possible range of scores from 3 to 9. Researchers in the past have grouped people who score 3 - 5 as "not lonely" and people with the score 6 - 9 as "lonely".

The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) 3-item loneliness scale assess relational connectedness, social connectedness and self-perceived isolation.

The scores for each individual question can be added together to give participants a possible range of scores from 3 to 9. Researchers in the past have grouped people who score 3 - 5 as "not lonely" and people with the score 6 - 9 as "lonely".

Interpersonal Support Evaluation List short form (ISEL) has 12 items assessing appraisal, belonging and tangible social support.

A 12-item measure of perceptions of social support. Response options range from 1-4 with 4 = "definitely true" if the participant is sure it is true about them, 3= "probably true" if the participant thinks it is true but is not absolutely certain. Similarly, the participant should circle 1 = "definitely false" if they are sure the statement is false and 2 = "probably false" if the participant thinks it is false but is not absolutely certain. This questionnaire has three different subscales designed to measure three dimensions of perceived social support. These dimensions are: 1.) Appraisal Support 2.) Belonging Support 3.) Tangible Support Each dimension is measured by 4 items on a 4-point scale ranging from "Definitely True" to "Definitely False". The minimum score is 12 and the maximum is 48. Higher scores are a better outcome.

A 12-item measure of perceptions of social support. Response options range from 1-4 with 4 = "definitely true" if the participant is sure it is true about them, 3= "probably true" if the participant thinks it is true but is not absolutely certain. Similarly, the participant should circle 1 = "definitely false" if they are sure the statement is false and 2 = "probably false" if the participant thinks it is false but is not absolutely certain. This questionnaire has three different subscales designed to measure three dimensions of perceived social support. These dimensions are: 1.) Appraisal Support 2.) Belonging Support 3.) Tangible Support Each dimension is measured by 4 items on a 4-point scale ranging from "Definitely True" to "Definitely False". The minimum score is 12 and the maximum is 48. Higher scores are a better outcome.

World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) has 5 items assessing emotional well-being.

The raw score is calculated by totaling the figures of the five answers. The raw score ranges from 0 to 25, 0 representing worst possible and 25 representing best possible quality of life The outcome measure represents the mean of the raw score.

World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) has 5 items assessing emotional well-being.

The raw score is calculated by totaling the figures of the five answers. The raw score ranges from 0 to 25, 0 representing worst possible and 25 representing best possible quality of life The outcome measure represents the mean of the raw score.

The Neuropsychiatric Inventory Caregiver Distress Scale has 12 items assessing distress associated with dementia patient's behaviors such as apathy, elation, disinhibition. Participant distress is rated for each positive neuropsychiatric symptom domain on a scale anchored by score from 0 to 5 points. The Score is: 0 = Not distressing at all, 1 = Minimal (slightly distressing, not a problem to cope with), 2 = Mild (not very distressing, generally easy to cope with), 3 = Moderate (fairly distressing, not always easy to cope with), 4 = Severe (very distressing, difficult to cope with), 5 = Extreme of Very Severe (extremely distressing, unable to cope with). The minimum is 0, indicating less distress and a better outcome and he maximum is 60, indicating more distress and a worse outcome.

The Neuropsychiatric Inventory Caregiver Distress Scale has 12 items assessing distress associated with dementia patient's behaviors such as apathy, elation, disinhibition. Participant distress is rated for each positive neuropsychiatric symptom domain on a scale anchored by score from 0 to 5 points. The Score is: 0 = Not distressing at all, 1 = Minimal (slightly distressing, not a problem to cope with), 2 = Mild (not very distressing, generally easy to cope with), 3 = Moderate (fairly distressing, not always easy to cope with), 4 = Severe (very distressing, difficult to cope with), 5 = Extreme of Very Severe (extremely distressing, unable to cope with). The minimum is 0, indicating less distress and a better outcome and he maximum is 60, indicating more distress and a worse outcome.

The investigators will use the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-3) to assess participants' satisfaction with the intervention. The questionnaire consists of 3 questions rating participants' satisfaction on a scale of 1-4, with 1 being not satisfied at all and 4 being very satisfied. Total possible score is 12 and the least possible score is 3.

The investigators will ask participants about their perceptions of whether or not they feel that they improved in stress, depression, anxiety and wellbeing. PGIC is a 5 point scale depicting a participant's rating of overall improvement. Participants rate their change as "much improved", "minimally improved", "no change", "minimally worse", or "much worse". A score of 1 is much worse and 5 is much improved.

The investigators will assess both therapists' ability to deliver the content of each session (through therapist completed adherence checklists) and therapist fidelity (through independent review of recorded sessions by Co-Investigator). Ratings will be given for each of six sessions on the following scale: 1=Not Present,3=Slightly Present,5=Moderately Present,7=Often Present,10=Always Present. An average score of 10 for all sessions represents all content always delivered, and an average score of 1 represents no content delivered as intended. Benchmark: >=75% of MASC sessions components delivered as intended; 20% sessions rated.

The investigators will use the 'Perceptions of Questionnaire Battery' qualitative measure to assess how appropriately the participants fill the questionnaires, address their perception of stress, emotional distress and all other questionnaires.

The investigators will report proportion of participants who complete weekly home practice.

The investigators will assess participants' perception of emails and text messages reminders by asking, "Do participants think that the amount of emails/texts received was: too little, just enough, too much?"

The investigators will use the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) to assess participants' perceptions that the treatment will work after participating in the intervention. The CEQ utilizes two scales during the administration (1-9, and 0-100%), and so a composite score was derived for each factor (expectancy and credibility) by first standardizing the individual items and then summing those items for each factor. The minimum score is a 1, indicating worse outcome and less credibility and the maximum score is a 9, indicating a better outcome and more credibility.

The Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS) is a process measure used to quantify how participants in mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) use mindfulness practice when facing challenges in daily life. Development and validation of the AMPS yielded 15 items representing three domains of applied mindfulness processes: (a) decentering, (b) positive emotional regulation, and (c) negative emotional regulation. Increases over time in AMPS scores suggest greater application of the use of mindfulness skills in daily life coinciding with mindfulness practice. Instructions for scoring:(1) Sum each factor individually to obtain a score ranging from 0-20, and/or (2) sum all 15 items to obtain a score ranging from 0-60. This is used as a replacement for the FFMQ.

The Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS) is a process measure used to quantify how participants in mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) use mindfulness practice when facing challenges in daily life. Development and validation of the AMPS yielded 15 items representing three domains of applied mindfulness processes: (a) decentering, (b) positive emotional regulation, and (c) negative emotional regulation. Increases over time in AMPS scores suggest greater application of the use of mindfulness skills in daily life coinciding with mindfulness practice. Instructions for scoring:(1) Sum each factor individually to obtain a score ranging from 0-20, and/or (2) sum all 15 items to obtain a score ranging from 0-60. This is used as a replacement for the FFMQ.

The Modified Perception of Global Improvement (MPGI) is a global index designed to measure a participant's interpretation of changes in perceptions of stress following intervention. 0 indicates not improved and 1 indicates improved.

The Positive Affect Index (PAI) (5 items) assesses communication quality, closeness, similarity of views on life, engagement in joint activities and overall relationship quality. Each item is rated on a six-point scale and responses are summed for a total score. Possible scores range from 10 to 60 with higher scores indicating better relationship quality.

The Positive Affect Index (PAI) (5 items) assesses communication quality, closeness, similarity of views on life, engagement in joint activities and overall relationship quality. Each item is rated on a six-point scale and responses are summed for a total score. Possible scores range from 10 to 60 with higher scores indicating better relationship quality.

Each of the 12 NPI-Q domains contains a survey question that reflects cardinal symptoms of that domain. Initial responses to each domain question are "Yes" (present) or "No" (absent). If "Yes", the informant then rates both the Severity of the symptoms present within the last month on a 3-point scale and the associated impact of the symptom manifestations on them (i.e. Caregiver Distress) using a 5-point scale. Presence range 0-12, 0 being not symptomatic. Severity range 12-36, 12 being mild. Distress range 0-60, 0 is not distressing.

This scale measures the level of self-compassion a participant has towards themselves with 12 questions on a scale of 1-5 (1 meaning "almost never" and 5 meaning "almost always). Scores are mainly used in a comparative manner to examine outcomes for people scoring higher or lower in self-compassion. As an ad hoc rubric, you can consider scores 1.0-2.49 to be low, between 2.5-3.5 to be moderate, and 3.51-5.0 to be high. When trying to determine whether self-compassion levels are high or low relevant to a particular sample, some researchers use a median split.

The Compassion Scale measures how much compassion one has for others with 16 questions. The highest score possible is a 5, meaning higher compassion, and the lowest score possible is a 2, meaning lower compassion.

This scale measures how confident participants are that they can keep up with their own activities and also respond to caregiving situations. There are 10 questions, rated 0 to 100, where 0 is not confident at all and 100 is very confident. The score is calculated by standardizing each score from 0-10 and summing the total. A 0 is the minimum, meaning not confident, and 100 is the maximum, meaning very confident.

The Who-5 well-being scale measures perceived quality of life. The raw score is calculated by totaling the scores of the five questions. The raw score ranges from 0 to 25, 0 representing worst possible and 25 representing best possible quality of life.

The investigators will calculate the proportion of participants completing the study who have less than 25% of missing questionnaires. Benchmark: ≥70% participants will have less than 25% missing questionnaires.

The number of participants who completed the baseline questionnaire is 13.

The investigators will calculate the proportion of participants completing the study who have less than 25% of missing questionnaires. Benchmark: ≥70% participants will have less than 25% missing questionnaires.

While 13 participants completed the baseline survey, only 12/13 participants attended the sessions (intervention). Therefore,12 participants were counted as completing the study, which was measured as those who completed the baseline survey and attended the intervention sessions. 11/12 completed participants completed the post-intervention survey.

The investigators will assess the feasibility of the quantitative measures sent to participants. Benchmark: No questionnaires missing fully in ≥25% participants.

The investigators will assess the feasibility of the quantitative measures sent to participants. Benchmark: No questionnaires missing fully in ≥25% participants.

The investigators will use the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D). This is a 20-item scale widely used with ADRD participants. Response options range from 0 to 3 for each item (0 = Rarely or None of the Time, 1 = Some or Little of the Time, 2 = Moderately or Much of the time, 3 = Most or Almost All the Time) In scoring the CES-D, possible range of scores is 0 to 60, with the higher scores indicating the presence of more symptomatology.

The investigators will use the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D). This is a 20-item scale widely used with ADRD participants. Response options range from 0 to 3 for each item (0 = Rarely or None of the Time, 1 = Some or Little of the Time, 2 = Moderately or Much of the time, 3 = Most or Almost All the Time) In scoring the CES-D, possible range of scores is 0 to 60, with the higher scores indicating the presence of more symptomatology.

11/13 participants completed the post-intervention CES-D survey.

The investigators will use the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) to assess caregivers mindfulness based on 5 subscales (observing, describing, awareness, non-judging, non-reactivity). Average scores are calculated by summing the responses and dividing by the number of items, and indicate the average level of agreement with the each subscale (1 = rarely true, 5 = always true). Higher scores are indicative of someone who is more mindful in their everyday life. Its facet scores range from 3-15.

The investigators will use the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) to assess caregivers mindfulness based on 5 subscales (observing, describing, awareness, non-judging, non-reactivity). Average scores are calculated by summing the responses and dividing by the number of items, and indicate the average level of agreement with the each subscale (1 = rarely true, 5 = always true). Higher scores are indicative of someone who is more mindful in their everyday life. Its facet scores range from 3-15.

The investigators will use the Perceived Stress Scale 10 (PSS-10) to assess perceived stress using a 5-point Likert scale.

Scoring Instructions: Total score is determined by adding together the scores of each of the four items. Questions 2 and 3 are reverse coded. Questions 1 and 4: 0 = Never; 1 = Almost never; 2 = Sometimes; 3 = Fairly often; 4 = Very often Questions 2 and 3: 4 = Never; 3 = Almost never; 2 = Sometimes; 1 = Fairly often; 0 = Very often.

Scores range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating more stress.

The investigators will use the Perceived Stress Scale 10 (PSS-10) to assess perceived stress using a 5-point Likert scale.

Scoring Instructions: Total score is determined by adding together the scores of each of the four items. Questions 2 and 3 are reverse coded. Questions 1 and 4: 0 = Never; 1 = Almost never; 2 = Sometimes; 3 = Fairly often; 4 = Very often Questions 2 and 3: 4 = Never; 3 = Almost never; 2 = Sometimes; 1 = Fairly often; 0 = Very often.

Scores range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating more stress.

11/13 participants completed the post-intervention PSS-10 survey.

The investigators will use State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) state subscales (20 items) to assess anxiety symptoms in response to stressful situations. STA has been successfully used with ADRD participants.

The range of possible scores varies from a minimum score of 20 to a maximum score of 80. STAI scores are commonly classified as "no or low anxiety" (20-37), "moderate anxiety" (38-44), and "high anxiety" (45-80).

The investigators will use State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) state subscales (20 items) to assess anxiety symptoms in response to stressful situations. STA has been successfully used with ADRD participants.

The range of possible scores varies from a minimum score of 20 to a maximum score of 80. STAI scores are commonly classified as "no or low anxiety" (20-37), "moderate anxiety" (38-44), and "high anxiety" (45-80).

The Self-Compassion Scale - Short Form (SCS-SF) is a 12-item self-report measure that is used by adults to measure their capacity for self-compassion - the ability to hold one's feelings of suffering with a sense of warmth, connection and concern. Self-Kindness Items: 2, 6 Self-Judgment Items (Reverse Scored): 11, 12 Common Humanity Items: 5, 10 Isolation Items: 4, 8 Mindfulness Items: 3, 7 Over-identification Items : 1, 9 = max score of 8 per category

The Self-Compassion Scale - Short Form (SCS-SF) is a 12-item self-report measure that is used by adults to measure their capacity for self-compassion - the ability to hold one's feelings of suffering with a sense of warmth, connection and concern. Self-Kindness Items: 2, 6 Self-Judgment Items (Reverse Scored): 11, 12 Common Humanity Items: 5, 10 Isolation Items: 4, 8 Mindfulness Items: 3, 7 Over-identification Items : 1, 9 = max score of 8 per category

10/13 participants completed the post-intervention SCS survey.

The Compassion Scale (CS) has 16 items assessing common humanity, kindness toward others and ability to understand the suffering or challenges of others. Kindness items: 2, 6, 10, 14 Common Humanity items: 4, 8, 12, 16 Mindfulness items: 1, 5, 9, 13 Indifference items (reverse scored): 3, 7, 11, 15. Subscale scores are computed by calculating the mean of the four subscale item responses. To compute a total compassion score, reverse score the indifference items then take a grand mean of all items. When examining subscale scores, higher scores on indifference items indicate less compassion before reverse-coding, and more compassion after reverse coding. Participants can choose to report indifference scores with or without reverse-coding, but items must be reverse coded before calculating a total compassion score.

The Compassion Scale (CS) has 16 items assessing common humanity, kindness toward others and ability to understand the suffering or challenges of others. Kindness items: 2, 6, 10, 14 Common Humanity items: 4, 8, 12, 16 Mindfulness items: 1, 5, 9, 13 Indifference items (reverse scored): 3, 7, 11, 15. Subscale scores are computed by calculating the mean of the four subscale item responses. To compute a total compassion score, reverse score the indifference items then take a grand mean of all items. When examining subscale scores, higher scores on indifference items indicate less compassion before reverse-coding, and more compassion after reverse coding. Participants can choose to report indifference scores with or without reverse-coding, but items must be reverse coded before calculating a total compassion score.

10/13 participants completed the CS post-intervention survey.

This scale measures how confident participants are that they can keep up with their own activities and also respond to caregiving situations. There are 10 questions, rated 0 to 100, where 0 is not confident at all and 100 is very confident. The score is calculated by standardizing each score from 0-10 and summing the total. A 0 is the minimum, meaning not confident, and 100 is the maximum, meaning very confident.

This scale measures how confident participants are that they can keep up with their own activities and also respond to caregiving situations. There are 10 questions, rated 0 to 100, where 0 is not confident at all and 100 is very confident. The score is calculated by standardizing each score from 0-10 and summing the total. A 0 is the minimum, meaning not confident, and 100 is the maximum, meaning very confident.

9/13 participants completed the RSCSE post-intervention survey.

The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) 3-item loneliness scale assess relational connectedness, social connectedness and self-perceived isolation.

The scores for each individual question can be added together to give participants a possible range of scores from 3 to 9. Researchers in the past have grouped people who score 3 - 5 as "not lonely" and people with the score 6 - 9 as "lonely".

The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) 3-item loneliness scale assess relational connectedness, social connectedness and self-perceived isolation.

The scores for each individual question can be added together to give participants a possible range of scores from 3 to 9. Researchers in the past have grouped people who score 3 - 5 as "not lonely" and people with the score 6 - 9 as "lonely".

11/13 participants completed the UCLA post-intervention survey.

Interpersonal Support Evaluation List short form (ISEL) has 12 items assessing appraisal, belonging and tangible social support.

A 12-item measure of perceptions of social support. Response options range from 1-4 with 4 = "definitely true" if the participant is sure it is true about them, 3= "probably true" if the participant thinks it is true but is not absolutely certain. Similarly, the participant should circle 1 = "definitely false" if they are sure the statement is false and 2 = "probably false" if the participant thinks it is false but is not absolutely certain. This questionnaire has three different subscales designed to measure three dimensions of perceived social support. These dimensions are: 1.) Appraisal Support 2.) Belonging Support 3.) Tangible Support Each dimension is measured by 4 items on a 4-point scale ranging from "Definitely True" to "Definitely False". The minimum score is 12 and the maximum is 48. Higher scores are a better outcome.

A 12-item measure of perceptions of social support. Response options range from 1-4 with 4 = "definitely true" if the participant is sure it is true about them, 3= "probably true" if the participant thinks it is true but is not absolutely certain. Similarly, the participant should circle 1 = "definitely false" if they are sure the statement is false and 2 = "probably false" if the participant thinks it is false but is not absolutely certain. This questionnaire has three different subscales designed to measure three dimensions of perceived social support. These dimensions are: 1.) Appraisal Support 2.) Belonging Support 3.) Tangible Support Each dimension is measured by 4 items on a 4-point scale ranging from "Definitely True" to "Definitely False". The minimum score is 12 and the maximum is 48. Higher scores are a better outcome.

11/13 participants completed the ISEL post-intervention survey.

World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) has 5 items assessing emotional well-being.

The raw score is calculated by totaling the figures of the five answers. The raw score ranges from 0 to 25, 0 representing worst possible and 25 representing best possible quality of life The outcome measure represents the mean of the raw score.

World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) has 5 items assessing emotional well-being.

The raw score is calculated by totaling the figures of the five answers. The raw score ranges from 0 to 25, 0 representing worst possible and 25 representing best possible quality of life The outcome measure represents the mean of the raw score.

9/13 participants complete the WHO post-intervention survey.

The Neuropsychiatric Inventory Caregiver Distress Scale has 12 items assessing distress associated with dementia patient's behaviors such as apathy, elation, disinhibition. Participant distress is rated for each positive neuropsychiatric symptom domain on a scale anchored by score from 0 to 5 points. The Score is: 0 = Not distressing at all, 1 = Minimal (slightly distressing, not a problem to cope with), 2 = Mild (not very distressing, generally easy to cope with), 3 = Moderate (fairly distressing, not always easy to cope with), 4 = Severe (very distressing, difficult to cope with), 5 = Extreme of Very Severe (extremely distressing, unable to cope with). The minimum is 0, indicating less distress and a better outcome and he maximum is 60, indicating more distress and a worse outcome.

The Neuropsychiatric Inventory Caregiver Distress Scale has 12 items assessing distress associated with dementia patient's behaviors such as apathy, elation, disinhibition. Participant distress is rated for each positive neuropsychiatric symptom domain on a scale anchored by score from 0 to 5 points. The Score is: 0 = Not distressing at all, 1 = Minimal (slightly distressing, not a problem to cope with), 2 = Mild (not very distressing, generally easy to cope with), 3 = Moderate (fairly distressing, not always easy to cope with), 4 = Severe (very distressing, difficult to cope with), 5 = Extreme of Very Severe (extremely distressing, unable to cope with). The minimum is 0, indicating less distress and a better outcome and he maximum is 60, indicating more distress and a worse outcome.

11/13 participants completed the NPI distress post-intervention survey.

The investigators will use the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-3) to assess participants' satisfaction with the intervention. The questionnaire consists of 3 questions rating participants' satisfaction on a scale of 1-4, with 1 being not satisfied at all and 4 being very satisfied. Total possible score is 12 and the least possible score is 3.

10/13 participants completed the CSQ post-intervention survey.

The investigators will ask participants about their perceptions of whether or not they feel that they improved in stress, depression, anxiety and wellbeing. PGIC is a 5 point scale depicting a participant's rating of overall improvement. Participants rate their change as "much improved", "minimally improved", "no change", "minimally worse", or "much worse". A score of 1 is much worse and 5 is much improved.

10/13 participants completed the PGIC post-intervention survey.

The investigators will assess both therapists' ability to deliver the content of each session (through therapist completed adherence checklists) and therapist fidelity (through independent review of recorded sessions by Co-Investigator). Ratings will be given for each of six sessions on the following scale: 1=Not Present,3=Slightly Present,5=Moderately Present,7=Often Present,10=Always Present. An average score of 10 for all sessions represents all content always delivered, and an average score of 1 represents no content delivered as intended. Benchmark: >=75% of MASC sessions components delivered as intended; 20% sessions rated.

Both groups were analyzed with 6 sessions in each group. Number of participants in both sessions varied from 9-12.

The investigators will use the 'Perceptions of Questionnaire Battery' qualitative measure to assess how appropriately the participants fill the questionnaires, address their perception of stress, emotional distress and all other questionnaires.

The investigators will report proportion of participants who complete weekly home practice.

12/13 participants attended sessions and were sent homepractice surveys.

The investigators will assess participants' perception of emails and text messages reminders by asking, "Do participants think that the amount of emails/texts received was: too little, just enough, too much?"

The investigators will use the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) to assess participants' perceptions that the treatment will work after participating in the intervention. The CEQ utilizes two scales during the administration (1-9, and 0-100%), and so a composite score was derived for each factor (expectancy and credibility) by first standardizing the individual items and then summing those items for each factor. The minimum score is a 1, indicating worse outcome and less credibility and the maximum score is a 9, indicating a better outcome and more credibility.

9/13 participants filled out the post-intervention CEQ survey.

The Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS) is a process measure used to quantify how participants in mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) use mindfulness practice when facing challenges in daily life. Development and validation of the AMPS yielded 15 items representing three domains of applied mindfulness processes: (a) decentering, (b) positive emotional regulation, and (c) negative emotional regulation. Increases over time in AMPS scores suggest greater application of the use of mindfulness skills in daily life coinciding with mindfulness practice. Instructions for scoring:(1) Sum each factor individually to obtain a score ranging from 0-20, and/or (2) sum all 15 items to obtain a score ranging from 0-60. This is used as a replacement for the FFMQ.

The Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS) is a process measure used to quantify how participants in mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) use mindfulness practice when facing challenges in daily life. Development and validation of the AMPS yielded 15 items representing three domains of applied mindfulness processes: (a) decentering, (b) positive emotional regulation, and (c) negative emotional regulation. Increases over time in AMPS scores suggest greater application of the use of mindfulness skills in daily life coinciding with mindfulness practice. Instructions for scoring:(1) Sum each factor individually to obtain a score ranging from 0-20, and/or (2) sum all 15 items to obtain a score ranging from 0-60. This is used as a replacement for the FFMQ.

10/13 participants completed the post-intervention AMPS survey.

The Modified Perception of Global Improvement (MPGI) is a global index designed to measure a participant's interpretation of changes in perceptions of stress following intervention. 0 indicates not improved and 1 indicates improved.

9/13 participants completed the MPGI post-intervention survey.

The Positive Affect Index (PAI) (5 items) assesses communication quality, closeness, similarity of views on life, engagement in joint activities and overall relationship quality. Each item is rated on a six-point scale and responses are summed for a total score. Possible scores range from 10 to 60 with higher scores indicating better relationship quality.

The Positive Affect Index (PAI) (5 items) assesses communication quality, closeness, similarity of views on life, engagement in joint activities and overall relationship quality. Each item is rated on a six-point scale and responses are summed for a total score. Possible scores range from 10 to 60 with higher scores indicating better relationship quality.

10/13 participants completed the PAI post-intervention survey.