Fibromyalgia (FM) is a syndrome characterized by generalized musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, non-restorative sleep, cognitive changes, depressive and neurovegetative symptoms. It is known that conventional pharmacological therapies produce responses with little clinical impact in more than 50% of patients. Functional alterations of the motor cortex and its connections with subcortical structures have also been demonstrated in FM. Based on the above, the objective of this research is to identify subgroups of patients with greater potential for responsiveness to treatment with a view to advancing diagnosis and treatment. In this study, the therapeutic target will be transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) according to the potential of responsiveness to the placebo effect, with the precise location of the stimulation area by a neuronavigation system, with the objective of counter-regulating the dysfunctional processes responsible for triggering and maintaining FM symptoms. Therefore, this clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy of anodal tDCS applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) compared to simulated tDCS in FM, according to susceptibility to placebo effect and serum endorphin levels.

This is clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy of anodal tDCS applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) compared to simulated tDCS in FM, according to susceptibility to placebo effect and serum endorphin levels, in the following outcomes (1) treatment effectiveness, which includes daily measures recorded in an application by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), which allows pain assessment from a multidimensional perspective (pain intensity and interference in general activities, mood, mobility, work, personal relationships, sleep and enjoyment of life, etc.) (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes: the impact of pain on quality of life; levels of depressive symptoms; (2) Outcomes in psychophysical measures: pain threshold to electrical stimulation and heat; temporal summation to electrical stimulus; descending pain modulatory system function; (3) Identify predictors of response to the placebo effect through a hierarchical model with an analytical structure defined a 'priori', considering the hierarchical relationships between potential predictors such as: disability due to pain, catastrophism, depressive symptoms, psychiatric diagnoses, level of central sensitization, endorphin serum levels at baseline, drugs in use, etc. In this randomized, controlled, sham-controlled, parallel, double-blind clinical trial, 84 women with FM will be included, according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (2016), aged between 18 and 70 years. Patients will be submitted to a simulated tDCS face-to-face session, mounted on the left DLPFC, and with a variation presented in the Numerical Verbal Pain Scale (NPS 0-10) equal to or greater than thirty percent of the baseline, the patient will be considered a high responder and below this low responder rate. This will be the criterion used to stratify randomization. They will receive 30 sessions of anodal tDCS lasting 20 min, with a current of 2 mA, applied to the left DLPFC at home. The location of the stimulation area will be done by a neuronavigation system. Patients will receive training in using the tDCS equipment.

They will have access to an instructional video on tDCS and a way of communicating with the team through Whatsapp. The follow-up time after the end of stimulation will be 12 weeks as recommended by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT). Patients should respond daily to BPI and possible side effects of tDCS. Home tDCS will be carried out with equipment developed by our research group, in partnership with Biomedical Engineering at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), with patent registration with the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) under number BR2020150164500. Our hypothesis is that active tDCS has a greater effect than simulated tDCS and that stimulation on the DLPFC has a greater impact in patients with greater responsiveness to the placebo effect on psychological symptoms, functional capacity for activities of daily living and inhibitory modulatory system function. descendant of pain. It is expected that the level of cortical disinhibition assessed by TMS measurements, as well as serum ß-endorphin levels, can serve as predictors of treatment response.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Women aged 18 to 65 years; who can read and write, with a confirmed diagnosis of FM according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (2010-2016). Pain score equal to or greater than six on the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS 0-10) on most days of the last 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Residing outside the greater Porto Alegre area and pregnancy. Contraindications to TMS and tDCS: metallic implant in the brain; medical devices implanted in the brain, cardiac pacemakers; cochlear implant; history of alcohol or drug abuse in the last 6 months; neurological pathologies; hx of head trauma or neurosurgery; decompensated systemic diseases and chronic inflammatory diseases (lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Reiter's syndrome); uncompensated hypothyroidism; personal history of cancer, past or undergoing treatment.

The researcher will receive equipment already programmed by a research assistant, so the researcher who will deliver the tDCS to perform stimulation will not know the programed stimulation. Patients will be instructed to discuss aspects of treatment with the respective investigator. Two independent evaluators who will not participate in the consultations where guidance on the use of tDCS will be provided will be trained to make outcome assessments in follow-up. Patients will not be aware of the type of intervention received, since the sham condition produces a stimulus, but no expected effects. In order to study the level of the blinding, at each moment of evaluation, the patient will be asked about the type of intervention that he / she believes to have received (active or simulated), and about the degree of safety in the response, using a standardized questionnaire. The blinding will be evaluated at the end of each treatment week by means of a standardized instrument.