Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R34MH129187-01 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source | |
| 2025P013132 | Other Identifier | Emory Insight Humans IRB |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The research team has developed an interventional group program for young men living with HIV and will be adapting it for telehealth delivery. The purpose of the study is to determine whether or not this program can help improve social connections and the health of young men in online delivery and evaluate its potential for implementation in a community setting. The study has three phases: (1) engaging a community advisory board to create and adapt the intervention for online delivery, (2) a randomized clinical trial of the online intervention, and (3) evaluation of the program for community implementation with our partner organization. Participants in the second phase of the study will meet with a study team member to discuss the research process and provide informed consent. The community organization employees will provide consent online prior to completion of a survey and indicate whether they consent to be contacted further for in-depth interviews.
Subjects will participate in synchronous, online discussion sessions via videoconference for two hours per week over five weeks. Sessions will include engaging educational components and interactive activities, including discussions of case scenarios and sharing of personal experiences where desired. At the end of each videoconference session, participants will be asked to complete a brief session evaluation form rating the content, facilitation, and overall experience for the week. The long-term goal is to improve engagement across the HIV continuum of care (HIV-CoC) by enhancing individual- and community-level resilience processes among young Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (YB-GBMSM) living with HIV. To this end, the research team has used community-based participatory research methods to develop Brothers Building Brothers by Breaking Barriers (B6), a novel group-level intervention designed to affirm intersectional identities and augment social capital among YB-GBMSM. The goal of this current study is to adapt and pilot B6 for telehealth delivery (creating tele-B6) within the context of an established community-based organization (CBO), as a strategy to enhance feasibility and scalability before a larger efficacy trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tele-B6 | Experimental | The tele-B6 intervention includes five group sessions delivered over the course of five weeks. Survey assessments for the intervention group will be conducted at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (immediate post-intervention survey), 4 months (interim-survey, post-intervention), and 6 months (endline). |
|
| Wait-list control -delayed intervention | Other | A wait-list control design to safeguard ethical treatment of participants by ensuring that a potentially impactful intervention will be available to all after a brief waiting period. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tele-B6 | Behavioral | Participants will be part of the Tele-B6 intervention that includes five group sessions delivered over the course of five weeks. Survey assessments for the intervention group (first phase) will be conducted at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (immediate post-intervention survey), 4 months (interim-survey, post-intervention), and 6 months (endline). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability Scale | Post-session evaluation forms were administered after each intervention session and were evaluated collectively at the end of the study. This evaluation form included 7 statements (examples: "I felt comfortable in this virtual space", "I am confident I can apply the tools we learned today to my life") to be answered on a 5-point Likert scale (e.g., 5=strongly agree, 4=agree, 3=neutral, 2=disagree, 1=strongly disagree) as well as open ended questions (e.g., what did you like most?) | Study Exit (up to 6 months) |
| Number of Attended Sessions | Attendance was assessed using session logs recorded at each intervention visit, capturing the number of sessions attended during the five-week intervention period. For the immediate intervention arm (Tele-B6), attendance was recorded from baseline through completion of the five-week intervention (up to 2 months post-enrollment). For the delayed intervention (wait-list control) arm, attendance was recorded during the five-week intervention delivered between months 2 and 4 of study participation. | During intervention sessions up to 5 weeks (5 weeks total) |
| Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (Safety) | Review of Adverse Event Tracking Forms during study participation up to six months. | During study participation up to 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Material Resources Survey | Participants will complete the material resources survey to measure socioeconomic status. The material resources survey has 18 questions that ask how often the participants' family needs are adequately met. Items addressed resources such as having food for two meals a day, a house or apartment, money to pay monthly bills, time to get enough sleep/rest, and money to save. There are six options (never=0; rarely=1; less than half of the time=w, about half of the time=3; more than half of the time=4; and always=5). A sum score was computed with a potential range from 0 (never enough resources for all items) to 5 (always enough resources for all items), with a higher score indicative of more resources. The highest score means that needs are adequately met. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Qualitative Description of Intersectional Stigma | Participants will be asked to complete surveys with open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. | Exit of study (up to 6 months) |
| Qualitative Description of Logistical Barriers |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
male gender, inclusive of transgender men
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sophia A. Hussen, MD, MPH | Emory University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grady Infectious Diseases Program Clinic | Atlanta | Georgia | 30308 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42157631 | Derived | Hussen SA, Newman A Jr, Bullock M Jr, Reed MO, Murden RJ, Gutlay N, Opara SCO, Tewodros T, Dutta S, Doraivelu K, Camacho Gonzalez A, Gamarel K, Harper GW. Social Capital as Intervention: A Pilot Telehealth Trial (Tele-B6) Among Young Black Sexual Minority Men Living with HIV. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2026 May 19:10872914261453197. doi: 10.1177/10872914261453197. Online ahead of print. | |
| 41325601 | Derived | Reed MO, Bullock M, Newman A Jr, Dutta S, Opara SCO, Tewodros T, Doraivelu K, Camacho-Gonzalez A, Murden R, Gamarel K, Harper GW, Hussen SA. Brothers Building Brothers by Breaking Barriers: Protocol for a Pilot Trial of a Telehealth Social Capital Intervention for Young Black Sexual Minority Men Living With HIV. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Dec 1;14:e69961. doi: 10.2196/69961. |
Not provided
Not provided
The research team will share the results of surveys and clinical abstracted data in a de-identified dataset.
Not provided
The de-identified dataset will be available after the study and data analysis are complete.
All requests should be sent by email to the principal investigator.
Not provided
Survey assessments for the Tele-B6 arm were conducted at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (post-intervention), 4 months (interim, post-intervention), and 6 months (endline). Wait-list control (delayed intervention) participants began the full intervention at month 2, after their matched Tele-B6 completed the program and one follow-up survey. The wait-list control arm completed surveys at baseline, 2 months (pre-intervention), 4 months (immediate post-intervention), and 6 months (endline).
Summary results include only Phase 2, the randomized clinical trial, and participants who consented and participated in the online intervention. No consent or outcome data were collected in Phases 1 or 3, which were conducted solely to develop and adapt the program for online delivery and implementation. Participants were recruited from community and clinical partners in Atlanta. Enrollment began April 18, 2023; follow-up ended November 5, 2024.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Tele-B6 | The tele-B6 intervention includes five group sessions delivered over the course of five weeks. Survey assessments for the intervention group will be conducted at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (immediate post-intervention survey), 4 months (interim-survey, post-intervention), and 6 months (endline). Tele-B6: Participants will be part of the Tele-B6 intervention that includes five group sessions delivered over the course of five weeks. Survey assessments for the intervention group (first phase) will be conducted at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (immediate post-intervention survey), 4 months (interim-survey, post-intervention), and 6 months (endline). |
| FG001 | Wait-list Control -Delayed Intervention | A wait-list control design to safeguard ethical treatment of participants by ensuring that a potentially impactful intervention will be available to all after a brief waiting period. Delayed intervention (waitlist control): Wait-list control participants will be assigned to initiate the full intervention at month 2 after their enrollment (i.e., after they and their corresponding intervention group have completed their intervention and one follow-up survey). Wait-list control participants will complete surveys at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (pre-intervention), 4 months (immediate post-intervention), and 6 months (endline). |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Phase (Original Intervention Group |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Second Phase |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Tele-B6 | The tele-B6 intervention includes five group sessions delivered over the course of five weeks. Survey assessments for the intervention group will be conducted at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (immediate post-intervention survey), 4 months (interim-survey, post-intervention), and 6 months (endline). Tele-B6: Participants will be part of the Tele-B6 intervention that includes five group sessions delivered over the course of five weeks. Survey assessments for the intervention group (first phase) will be conducted at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (immediate post-intervention survey), 4 months (interim-survey, post-intervention), and 6 months (endline). |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Acceptability Scale | Post-session evaluation forms were administered after each intervention session and were evaluated collectively at the end of the study. This evaluation form included 7 statements (examples: "I felt comfortable in this virtual space", "I am confident I can apply the tools we learned today to my life") to be answered on a 5-point Likert scale (e.g., 5=strongly agree, 4=agree, 3=neutral, 2=disagree, 1=strongly disagree) as well as open ended questions (e.g., what did you like most?) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Study Exit (up to 6 months) | Surveys | Surveys |
|
Information on adverse events was collected starting from the time participants provided consent in both groups, including during the waiting period for the delayed intervention, and continued until the end of the study (after the intervention was administered to the Wait-list Control - Delayed Intervention arm, up to 6 months for both groups).
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Tele-B6 | The tele-B6 intervention includes five group sessions delivered over the course of five weeks. Survey assessments for the intervention group will be conducted at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (immediate post-intervention survey), 4 months (interim-survey, post-intervention), and 6 months (endline). Tele-B6: Participants will be part of the Tele-B6 intervention that includes five group sessions delivered over the course of five weeks. Survey assessments for the intervention group (first phase) will be conducted at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (immediate post-intervention survey), 4 months (interim-survey, post-intervention), and 6 months (endline). |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sophia A. Hussen, MD, MPH | Emory University | 404-616-2440 | shussen@emory.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Nov 3, 2025 | Dec 3, 2025 | Prot_SAP_001.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Dec 16, 2021 | Jul 22, 2024 | ICF_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006679 | HIV Seropositivity |
| D001727 | Bisexuality |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015658 | HIV Infections |
| D000086982 | Blood-Borne Infections |
| D003141 | Communicable Diseases |
| D007239 | Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Delayed intervention (waitlist control) | Behavioral | Wait-list control participants will be assigned to initiate the full intervention at month 2 after their enrollment (i.e., after they and their corresponding intervention group have completed their intervention and one follow-up survey). Wait-list control participants will complete surveys at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (pre-intervention), 4 months (immediate post-intervention), and 6 months (endline). |
|
| 0, 2, 4, 6 months |
| Everyday Discrimination Scale | Participants will complete the Everyday Discrimination Scale at baseline and after each session. Each response is assigned a value on the Likert scale ('never'=1 to 'almost every day'=6). Responses are averaged across items to produce a score ranging from 1 to 6. A higher score may indicate a higher perception of discrimination. | 0, 2, 4 months |
| Perception of HIV Stigma Scale | Participants will complete the HIV stigma scale at baseline and after each session. This scale includes 10 items, stigma rated on a 5-point scale from "Strongly Disagree"= 1 to "Strongly Agree"=5. For scoring, items are averaged, with higher total scores indicating greater perceived HIV stigma. | 0, 2, 4, 6 months |
| Personal Social Capital Scale | Participants will complete the personal social capital scale. The Personal Social Capital Scale (PSCS) measures an individual's personal social capital, assessing both bonding capital (strong ties like family/close friends) and bridging capital (weaker ties to diverse groups) through cognitive (trust, reciprocity) and structural (network size, frequency) elements, to understand resources for health, support, and behavior. A five-point Likert scale is used to assess these questions, with 1 = none and 5 = all. A composite score will be derived by summarizing the item scores. The overall score range is typically 8 to 40 points. Higher scores indicate greater personal social capital, meaning the individual has a larger, more trustworthy social network with more resources and support available. Lower scores suggest fewer social connections and resources, which may be associated with increased stress or poorer health outcomes. | 0, 2, 4, 6 months |
| Number of Participants With Studies Depression Scale Greater Than 16 | Participants will complete the Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) survey. In scoring the CES-D, a value of 0, 1, 2, or 3 is assigned to a response depending upon whether the item is worded positively or negatively. The possible range of scores is 0 to 60, with the higher scores indicating greater symptomatology. The standard cut-off score on the 20-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) to indicate a risk for clinical depression is 16 or higher. Scores are interpreted as follows: 0-14: Mild or no depressive symptoms 15-23: Moderate or significant depressive symptoms 24 or higher: Severe depressive symptoms | 0, 2, 4, 6 months |
| General Well-being (GWB) Survey | Participants will complete the general well-being (GWB) survey. The General Well-Being Schedule (GWB) is designed to assess an individual's mental health or quality of life. The GWB consists of 18 items indicating subjective feelings of psychological well-being and distress. All of the items utilize the past month as the time frame of interest. The first 14 questions use a six-point rating scale that represents either intensity or frequency. The remaining items use a 0-10 rating scale that is anchored by adjectives. Because some items are reverse scored (items 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, 11, 15, and 16), 14 is subtracted from the total score, yielding a total possible range of scores from 0 to 110. Low scores represent greater distress. Proposed cutoffs representing three levels of distress are 0-60 (severe distress), 61-72 (moderate distress), and 73-110 (positive well-being). | 0, 2, 4, 6 months |
Participants will be asked to complete open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. |
| Exit of study (up to 6 months) |
| Perception of Individual Resilience Process: Identity Affirmation | Participants will complete the multidimensional model of black identity lesbian, gay, and bisexual identity scale, | 0, 2, 4, 6 months |
| Qualitative Description of the Minority Stress | Participants will be asked to complete open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. | Exit of study (up to 6 months) |
| Qualitative Description Individual Resilience Process: Identity Affirmation | Participants will be asked to complete open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. | Exit of study (up to 6 months) |
| Intersectional Stigma | Participants will be asked to complete surveys with open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. | Exit of study (up to 6 months) |
| Qualitative Description of the Community Resilience Process: Social Capital | Participants will be asked to complete open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. | Exit of study (up to 6 months) |
| Logistical Barriers | Participants will be asked to complete surveys and matched to a Zipcode to derive neighborhood measures. | 0, 2, 4, 6 months |
| Perception of the Internalized Homonegativity Inventory | Participants will complete the Internalized Homonegativity Inventory at baseline and after each session. This 26-item scale has four subscales: (a) Public Identification as Gay, (b) Perception of Stigma Associated with Being Gay, (c) Social Comfort with Gay Men, (d) Moral and Religious Acceptability of Being Gay. | 0, 2, 4, 6 months |
| HIV Viral Load | The research team will review the electronic medical record (EMR) to abstract HIV viral load information | 0 and 6 months |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| BG001 | Wait-list Control -Delayed Intervention | A wait-list control design to safeguard ethical treatment of participants by ensuring that a potentially impactful intervention will be available to all after a brief waiting period. Delayed intervention (waitlist control): Wait-list control participants will be assigned to initiate the full intervention at month 2 after their enrollment (i.e., after they and their corresponding intervention group have completed their intervention and one follow-up survey). Wait-list control participants will complete surveys at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (pre-intervention), 4 months (immediate post-intervention), and 6 months (endline). |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| OG001 | Wait-list Control -Delayed Intervention | A wait-list control design to safeguard ethical treatment of participants by ensuring that a potentially impactful intervention will be available to all after a brief waiting period. Delayed intervention (waitlist control): Wait-list control participants will be assigned to a group to initiate the full intervention at month 2 after their enrollment (i.e., beginning after they and their corresponding intervention group have completed their intervention and one follow-up survey). Wait-list control participants will complete surveys at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (pre-intervention), 4 months (immediate post-intervention), and 6 months (endline). |
|
|
| Primary | Number of Attended Sessions | Attendance was assessed using session logs recorded at each intervention visit, capturing the number of sessions attended during the five-week intervention period. For the immediate intervention arm (Tele-B6), attendance was recorded from baseline through completion of the five-week intervention (up to 2 months post-enrollment). For the delayed intervention (wait-list control) arm, attendance was recorded during the five-week intervention delivered between months 2 and 4 of study participation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Number of sessions attended | During intervention sessions up to 5 weeks (5 weeks total) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (Safety) | Review of Adverse Event Tracking Forms during study participation up to six months. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | During study participation up to 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Material Resources Survey | Participants will complete the material resources survey to measure socioeconomic status. The material resources survey has 18 questions that ask how often the participants' family needs are adequately met. Items addressed resources such as having food for two meals a day, a house or apartment, money to pay monthly bills, time to get enough sleep/rest, and money to save. There are six options (never=0; rarely=1; less than half of the time=w, about half of the time=3; more than half of the time=4; and always=5). A sum score was computed with a potential range from 0 (never enough resources for all items) to 5 (always enough resources for all items), with a higher score indicative of more resources. The highest score means that needs are adequately met. | Participants analyzed were those who completed the required surveys at the specified timepoints and had valid data available for analysis | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 0, 2, 4, 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Everyday Discrimination Scale | Participants will complete the Everyday Discrimination Scale at baseline and after each session. Each response is assigned a value on the Likert scale ('never'=1 to 'almost every day'=6). Responses are averaged across items to produce a score ranging from 1 to 6. A higher score may indicate a higher perception of discrimination. | Participants analyzed were those who completed the required surveys at the specified timepoints and had valid data available for analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 0, 2, 4 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Perception of HIV Stigma Scale | Participants will complete the HIV stigma scale at baseline and after each session. This scale includes 10 items, stigma rated on a 5-point scale from "Strongly Disagree"= 1 to "Strongly Agree"=5. For scoring, items are averaged, with higher total scores indicating greater perceived HIV stigma. | Participants analyzed were those who completed the required surveys at the specified timepoints and had valid data available for analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 0, 2, 4, 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Personal Social Capital Scale | Participants will complete the personal social capital scale. The Personal Social Capital Scale (PSCS) measures an individual's personal social capital, assessing both bonding capital (strong ties like family/close friends) and bridging capital (weaker ties to diverse groups) through cognitive (trust, reciprocity) and structural (network size, frequency) elements, to understand resources for health, support, and behavior. A five-point Likert scale is used to assess these questions, with 1 = none and 5 = all. A composite score will be derived by summarizing the item scores. The overall score range is typically 8 to 40 points. Higher scores indicate greater personal social capital, meaning the individual has a larger, more trustworthy social network with more resources and support available. Lower scores suggest fewer social connections and resources, which may be associated with increased stress or poorer health outcomes. | Participants analyzed were those who completed the required surveys at the specified timepoints and had valid data available for analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 0, 2, 4, 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Studies Depression Scale Greater Than 16 | Participants will complete the Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) survey. In scoring the CES-D, a value of 0, 1, 2, or 3 is assigned to a response depending upon whether the item is worded positively or negatively. The possible range of scores is 0 to 60, with the higher scores indicating greater symptomatology. The standard cut-off score on the 20-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) to indicate a risk for clinical depression is 16 or higher. Scores are interpreted as follows: 0-14: Mild or no depressive symptoms 15-23: Moderate or significant depressive symptoms 24 or higher: Severe depressive symptoms | Participants analyzed were those who completed the required surveys at the specified timepoints and had valid data available for analysis | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 0, 2, 4, 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | General Well-being (GWB) Survey | Participants will complete the general well-being (GWB) survey. The General Well-Being Schedule (GWB) is designed to assess an individual's mental health or quality of life. The GWB consists of 18 items indicating subjective feelings of psychological well-being and distress. All of the items utilize the past month as the time frame of interest. The first 14 questions use a six-point rating scale that represents either intensity or frequency. The remaining items use a 0-10 rating scale that is anchored by adjectives. Because some items are reverse scored (items 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, 11, 15, and 16), 14 is subtracted from the total score, yielding a total possible range of scores from 0 to 110. Low scores represent greater distress. Proposed cutoffs representing three levels of distress are 0-60 (severe distress), 61-72 (moderate distress), and 73-110 (positive well-being). | Participants analyzed were those who completed the required surveys at the specified timepoints and had valid data available for analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 0, 2, 4, 6 months |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Qualitative Description of Intersectional Stigma | Participants will be asked to complete surveys with open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. | Not Posted | Exit of study (up to 6 months) | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Qualitative Description of Logistical Barriers | Participants will be asked to complete open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. | Not Posted | Exit of study (up to 6 months) | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Perception of Individual Resilience Process: Identity Affirmation | Participants will complete the multidimensional model of black identity lesbian, gay, and bisexual identity scale, | Not Posted | 0, 2, 4, 6 months | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Qualitative Description of the Minority Stress | Participants will be asked to complete open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. | Not Posted | Exit of study (up to 6 months) | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Qualitative Description Individual Resilience Process: Identity Affirmation | Participants will be asked to complete open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. | Not Posted | Exit of study (up to 6 months) | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Intersectional Stigma | Participants will be asked to complete surveys with open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. | Not Posted | Exit of study (up to 6 months) | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Qualitative Description of the Community Resilience Process: Social Capital | Participants will be asked to complete open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. | Not Posted | Exit of study (up to 6 months) | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Logistical Barriers | Participants will be asked to complete surveys and matched to a Zipcode to derive neighborhood measures. | Not Posted | 0, 2, 4, 6 months | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Perception of the Internalized Homonegativity Inventory | Participants will complete the Internalized Homonegativity Inventory at baseline and after each session. This 26-item scale has four subscales: (a) Public Identification as Gay, (b) Perception of Stigma Associated with Being Gay, (c) Social Comfort with Gay Men, (d) Moral and Religious Acceptability of Being Gay. | Not Posted | 0, 2, 4, 6 months | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | HIV Viral Load | The research team will review the electronic medical record (EMR) to abstract HIV viral load information | Not Posted | 0 and 6 months | Participants |
| 0 |
| 30 |
| 0 |
| 30 |
| 0 |
| 30 |
| EG001 | Wait-list Control -Delayed Intervention | A wait-list control design to safeguard ethical treatment of participants by ensuring that a potentially impactful intervention will be available to all after a brief waiting period. Delayed intervention (waitlist control): Wait-list control participants will be assigned to initiate the full intervention at month 2 after their enrollment (i.e., beginning after they and their corresponding intervention group have completed their intervention and one follow-up survey). Wait-list control participants will complete surveys at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (pre-intervention), 4 months (immediate post-intervention), and 6 months (endline). | 0 | 30 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 30 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D015229 |
| Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral |
| D012749 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases |
| D016180 | Lentivirus Infections |
| D012192 | Retroviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D007153 | Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D019529 | Sexuality |
| D012725 | Sexual Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| 2 months |
|
|
| 4 months |
|
|
| 6 months |
|
|
| 2 months |
|
|
| 4 months |
|
|
| 2 months |
|
|
| 4 months |
|
|
| 6 months |
|
|
| 4 months |
|
|
| 6 months |
|
|
| 8 months |
|
|
| 2 months |
|
|
| 4 months |
|
|
| 6 months |
|
|
| 2 months |
|
|
| 4 months |
|
|
| 6 months |
|
|