Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 000 | Other Identifier | CTGTY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Caravan Wellness | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study will examine the role of digital wellness modules (brief mindfulness and light to moderate physical exercise) delivered through a smartphone wellness application and their short-term effects on health behavior motivation and change, and longer-term quality of life and non-pathological affective states.
Primary Objective: The primary objective of this parallel-assignment longitudinal study is to determine whether the digital wellness modules (e.g., mindfulness and light to moderate physical activity) increase quality of life and decrease stress, anxiety, and depression, as mediated by health behavior motivation and change in a healthy population of adults. Secondary Objective(s): The secondary objective is to ascertain qualitatively through deductive thematic analysis specific themes of a) key drivers of health behavior change; b) types of motivations that drive health behavior change, and c) implementation of sustained health behavior change.
The study will be conducted virtually by Yale University researchers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness | Experimental | Participants will take part in 7 repeating digital mindfulness modules using the Caravan Wellness App. |
|
| Light to Moderate Physical Activity | Experimental | Participants will take part in 7 repeating light to moderate physical activity digital wellness modules using the Caravan Wellness App. |
|
| Control | No Intervention | A no intervention group that will not be using the Caravan Wellness App. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caravan Wellness app | Device | Caravan Wellness is a digital platform that offers brief mindfulness and light to moderate physical activity modules, among many others (e.g., Pilates, Yoga, Barre, meditation, etc.), to enhance overall individual well-being. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Mindfulness assessed by the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) | The FFMQ is a 39-item questionnaire created to further explore the facet structure of mindfulness in daily life as a construct. It is composed of five component skills which contribute to mindfulness, non-reactivity to inner experiences (7 items), observing (8 items), acting with awareness (8 items), non-judging of inner experiences (8 items), and describing (8 items). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert- type scale, ranging from 1 (never or very rarely true) to 5 (very often or always true). Higher scores indicate more mindfulness. | baseline, 1 Month follow up, 3 Month follow up |
| Change in Exercise Behavior assessed by the Behavior Regulation Exercise Questionnaire, Third Version (BREQ-3) | The BREQ-3 is a 24-item scale with five factors that measure external, introjected, identified, and intrinsic forms of regulation of exercise behavior based on Deci & Ryan's continuum conception of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation, described by organismic integration theory. Each item is scored on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 ("Strongly Disagree") to 4 ("Strongly Agree"). Higher scores indicate an increase in exercise. | baseline, 1 Month follow up, 3 Month follow up |
| Utility of the Modules assessed by self report | Perceived utility of the modules will be assessed by self report using a one-item 5-point Likert scale = 0 (strongly disagree), 1 (disagree), 2 (agree), 3 (strongly agree), or 4 (undecided). | up to Day 22 |
| Daily stressors assessed using the Brief Daily Stressors Screening Tool (BDSST) | Daily stressors will be assessed using the BDSST, a short instrument for the recording of perceived general daily stressors in eight different areas of life. It is particularly suitable for use in large-scale studies or as a screening instrument for localizing areas of life where stress is particularly prevalent. A five-point Likert scale is used to measure the extent of the perceived stress experience from 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much") The higher the score, the more pronounced the subjective experience of general everyday stress. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sleep quality assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) | The PSQI is designed to evaluate overall sleep quality in clinical and non-clinical populations. The measure includes 19 self-reported items belonging to one of seven subcategories, including subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The questionnaire consists of a combination of Likert- type and openended questions (later converted to scaled scores using provided guidelines). Respondents are asked to indicate how frequently they have experienced certain sleep difficulties over the past month and to rate their overall sleep quality. Scores for each question range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more acute sleep disturbances. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Any individual who endorses any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
Positive Health Screening Questions, as measured by the Health Screening Questionnaire (HSQ):
Positive Psychiatric Disorders Screening Questions:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Klemanski, Psy.D., MPH | Contact | 203.214.5426 | david.klemanski@yale.edu | |
| Margaret T Davis | Contact | margaret.t.davis@yale.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David Klemanski, Psy.D., MPH | Yale University | Principal Investigator |
| Margaret T Davis, MD | Yale University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yale University | Recruiting | New Haven | Connecticut | 06520 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| D003863 | Depression |
| D000092862 | Psychological Well-Being |
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D010549 | Personal Satisfaction |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| up to Day 22 |
| Average number of minutes spent on Intervention | The average number of minutes per day spent on Intervention, as measured by self-report. | up to Day 22 |
| Change in health behavior motivation assessed using the Health Behavior Motivation Scale (HBMS) | Change in health behavior motivation will be measured using the HBMS, a 30-item, five-point Likert scale that has a five-dimensional structure (i.e., intrinsic regulation, integrated and identified regulation, introjected regulation, external regulation, and amotivation). Scale ranges from 1 ("Definitely disagree") to 5 ("Definitely agree"). Higher scores indicate more health behavior motivation. | baseline, 1 Month follow up, 3 Month follow up |
| CHange in health behavior assessed using he Health Behavior Inventory-20 (HBI-20). | Health behavior change will be measured using the HBI-20. The measure consists of a 20-items that factor into five subscales. Three subscales reflect health-promoting behaviors: Diet (five items), Preventive Care (seven items), and Medical Compliance (two items), and two subscales reflect health risk behaviors: Anger and Stress (three items), and Substance Use (three items). The health risk items are reverse-scored so that high scores on all subscales indicate a greater degree of health promotion and risk avoidance. Respondents are asked to rate the extent to which each item was self-descriptive, using a 7-point scale (e.g., 1 = always through 7 =never). Subscale scores are obtained by summing participants' responses (after reverse coding the risk items) and dividing them by the number of items. | baseline, 1 Month follow up, 3 Month follow up |
| Quality of life assessed using the Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI) | The QOLI has 16 well-defined domains: health, self-esteem, goals and values, money, work, play, learning, creativity, helping, love, friends, children, relatives, home, neighborhood, and community. Within each domain, respondents are asked to rate the importance of that domain to their happiness on a 3-point scale: 0 = Not important, 1 = Important, and 2 = Extremely important. They then rate their satisfaction with each domain from -3 = Extremely, -2 = Somewhat, and -1 = A little dissatisfied to +1 = A little, +2 = Somewhat, and +3 = Extremely satisfied for each domain. The QOLI is scored by multiplying importance scores by satisfaction scores for each of the 16 domains, and then calculating an average across domains. | baseline, 1 Month follow up, 3 Month follow up |
| Change in stress and non-pathological anxiety and depression assessed using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) | The DASS-21 assesses key symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress.The 21 items on the questionnaire comprise a set of three scales designed to assess depression, anxiety, and stress. The seven elements on each scale are rated on a Likert scale from 0 to 3 (0: "Did not apply to me at all," 1: "Applied to me to some degree or some of the time," 2: "Applied to me to a considerable degree or a good part of the time," and 3: "Applied to me very much or most of the time"). Scale scores are measured by summarizing the scores of the related items and then multiplying them by 2 to calculate the final score. Resulting ratings are then classified as: Depression: normal (0-4), mild (5-6), moderate (7-10), severe (11-13), or extremely severe (14+); Anxiety: normal (0-3), mild (4-5), moderate (6-7), severe (8-9), extremely severe (10+); Stress: normal (0-7), mild (8-9), moderate (10-12), severe (13-16), extremely severe (17+). | baseline, 1 Month follow up, 3 Month follow up |
| baseline, 1 Month follow up, 3 Month follow up |
| Physical activity assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Long Form (IPAQ-LF). | The IPAQ-LF is a 27-item survey that assesses the types of intensity of physical activity and sitting time. The scale asks respondents to rate during the last seven days engagement with physical activities. | up to Day 22 |