Neurological Outcomes Following Carpal Tunnel Decompression: a Comparison of Tissue Adhesive Material and Suture as Wound-closure Techniques
Neurological Outcomes Following Carpal Tunnel Decompression: a Comparison of Tissue Adhesive Material and Suture as Wound-closure Techniques
single-centre randomised prospective trial will conducted at the University Hospital of Split in Croatia. The investigators plan to enrol 100 patients, randomly assigned to suture-based wound closure (n=50) or tissue adhesive-based wound closure (n=50) with two-component skin adhesive Glubran Tiss 2®. The neurological outcomes will assessed postoperatively during the follow-up period at intervals of 2, 6, and 12 weeks respectively.
All surgical procedures will be performed with a tourniquet and local anaesthesia using 2% lidocaine in the palmar soft tissues and carpal tunnel. For all subjects, the standard carpal canal decompression procedure will began withskin incision in the radial half of the palm, followed by carpal ligament transection and cutting. Following primary closure, two different techniques were used depending on the subject's randomization group:
The neurological outcomes will assessed postoperatively during the follow-up period at intervals of 2, 6, and 12 weeks respectively.
Inclusion Criteria: (all of the above)
Exclusion Criteria: (one or more)