Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of Pimicotinib (ABSK021) in patients with Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT). The main questions it aims to answer are:
Participants will be asked to complete the study procedures:
This study consists of part 1 and part 2. Part 1 is a double-blind phase, eligible patients will be randomized to Pimicotinib(ABSK021) treatment group or matching placebo group and will receive Pimicotinib(ABSK021) or matching placebo until completion of Part 1.
Part 2 is an open-label treatment phase, and all patients entering this phase will receive open-label Pimicotinib(ABSK021) until completion of 24 weeks of dosing or withdrawal from the study.
Part 3 is an open-label extension treatment phase, and patients who completed the part 2 and continuted to be eligible, will go to the Part 3. Patients will receive the open-label Pimicotinib(ABSK021) until all patients withdraw from the study, or the sponsor decides to terminate the study, whichever occurs first.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1/Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)/ Pimicotinib(ABSK021) | Experimental | Participants receive the blinded treatment of ABSK021 for 24 weeks in Part 1 and continue on the open-label Pimicotinib(ABSK021) in Part 2 and Part 3. |
|
| Part 1- Placebo/ Pimicotinib(ABSK021) | Placebo Comparator | Participants receive the blinded treatment of matching placebo for 24 weeks in Part 1 and have option to receive the open-label Pimicotinib(ABSK021) in Part 2. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pimicotinib(ABSK021) | Drug | capsule |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Assessed by central read using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (Version 1.1) | Baseline to Week 25 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Tumor Volumn Score (TVS) | TVS is a semi-quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor. ORR was the percentage of participants who achieved either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as assessed by Blinded Independent Review Committee using TVS. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision NextGen Oncology | Beverly Hills | California | 90212 | United States | ||
| Duke University Medical Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41796601 | Derived | Xu H, Niu X, Ravi V, Martin-Broto J, Razak AA, Saleh R, Zhou Y, Shen J, Liu T, Sankhala KK, Serrano C, Stacchiotti S, Wang J, Baldi GG, Feng Y, Hua Y, Li T, Rutkowski P, Zhang X, Tinoco G, Zou Q, Shan B, Zhu X, Gelderblom H. Pimicotinib versus placebo for tenosynovial giant cell tumour (MANEUVER): an international, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2026 Mar 14;407(10533):1072-1083. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)02602-9. Epub 2026 Mar 5. | |
| 39287124 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Part 1/Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021) | Participants receive the blinded treatment of ABSK021 for 24 weeks in Part 1 and continue on the open-label Pimicotinib(ABSK021) in Part 2 and Part 3. Pimicotinib(ABSK021): capsule |
| FG001 | Part 1- Placebo, Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 to Week 24 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Apr 6, 2024 | Apr 7, 2026 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | capsule |
|
| Baseline to Week 25 |
| Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (ROM) at Week 25 | Presented here is the change from baseline in ROM to Week 25. Measurement of the affected and contralateral, non-affected joint was assessed by goniometer and measured in degrees. At baseline, the motion with the smallest relative ROM value (worst) was identified, and this motion was used for evaluating the change in relative ROM subsequently. The affected joint measurement was used to derive a relative ROM based on the measurement relative to reference standard value provided by the American Medical Association. Relative ROM is expressed in percent: 100 x (joint ROM measure)/(reference ROM standard). | Baseline to Week 25 |
| Change From Baseline in the Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 25 | The Worst Stiffness NRS is a single question that asks the participant to assess their worst stiffness in the last 24 hours. Participants rate their worst stiffness on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "no stiffness" and 10 is "worst imaginable." Lower scores represented better level of stiffness. | Baseline to Week 25 |
| Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain NRS Score at Week 25 | Participants reported responses to the BPI Worst Pain NRS. The BPI Worst Pain NRS ranged from 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "pain as bad as you can imagine." | Baseline to Week 25 |
| Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Score at Week 25 | All participants were asked 11 or 13 questions from the PROMIS-PF item bank. The questions used one of two 5-point verbal rating scales: either 1 = "unable to do", 2 = "with much difficulty", 3 = "with some difficulty", 4 = "with a little difficulty", and 5 = "without any difficulty"; or 1 = "cannot do", 2 = "quite a lot", 3 = "somewhat", 4 = "very little", and 5 = "not at all." The T-score rescales the total raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore, a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean. The T-score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better physical function status. | Baseline to Week 25 |
| Durham |
| California |
| 27710 |
| United States |
| Henry Ford Health System | Detroit | Michigan | 48202 | United States |
| Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center | Buffalo | New York | 14263 | United States |
| The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
| The Ohio State University | Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States |
| The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center | Seattle | Washington | 98109 | United States |
| McGill University Health Center | Montreal | Canada |
| Princess Margaret Cancer Center | Toronto | Canada |
| The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College | Bengbu | Anhui | China |
| Peking University People's Hospital | Beijing | Beijing Municipality | China |
| The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University | Fuzhou | Fujian | China |
| Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital | Guangzhou | Guangdong | China |
| The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University | Guangzhou | Guangdong | China |
| The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University | Guangzhou | Guangdong | China |
| The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University | Guiyang | Guizhou | China |
| Henan Cancer Hospital | Zhengzhou | Henan | China |
| The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture | Enshi | Hubei | China |
| Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology | Wuhan | Hubei | China |
| Hunan Provincial People's Hospital | Changsha | Hunan | China |
| The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University | Changsha | Hunan | China |
| Nanjing Drum Tower hospital | Nanjing | Jiangsu | China |
| Liaoning Cancer Hospital&Institute | Shenyang | Liaoning | China |
| Weifang People's Hospital | Weifang | Shandong | China |
| Shanghai General Hospital | Shanghai | Shanghai Municipality | China |
| The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University | Taiyuan | Shanxi | China |
| Xi'an Honghui Hospital | Xi’an | Shanxi | China |
| West China Hospital Sichuan University | Chengdu | Wuhan | China |
| The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University | Ürümqi | Xinjiang | China |
| The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine | Hangzhou | Zhejiang | China |
| Zhejiang Cancer Hospital | Hangzhou | Zhejiang | China |
| Beijing Jishuitan Hospital | Beijing | China |
| IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli | Bologna | Italy |
| Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori | Milan | Italy |
| Ospedale di Prato | Prato | Italy |
| Leiden University Medical Center | Leiden | 2333 | Netherlands |
| Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology | Warsaw | Poland |
| Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron | Barcelona | Spain |
| Fundacion Jimenez Diaz | Madrid | 28040 | Spain |
| Derived |
| Niu X, Ravi V, Shan B, Guo Q, Shi H, Zou Q, Gelderblom H. MANEUVER: A Phase III study of pimicotinib to assess efficacy and safety in tenosynovial giant cell tumor patients. Future Oncol. 2026 Feb;22(5):507-514. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2396227. Epub 2024 Sep 17. |
Participants receive the blinded treatment of matching placebo for 24 weeks in Part 1 and have option to receive the open-label Pimicotinib(ABSK021) in Part 2 and Part 3. Placebo: capsule Pimicotinib(ABSK021): capsule |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| Week 25 to Week 48 |
|
| Week 49 to End of Study |
|
This is the baseline analysis population for Part 1 (Weeks 1 - 24)
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Part 1/Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021) | Participants receive the blinded treatment of ABSK021 for 24 weeks in Part 1 and continue on the open-label Pimicotinib(ABSK021) in Part 2 and Part 3. Pimicotinib(ABSK021): capsule |
| BG001 | Part 1- Placebo, Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021) | Participants receive the blinded treatment of matching placebo for 24 weeks in Part 1 and have option to receive the open-label Pimicotinib(ABSK021) in Part 2 and Part 3. Placebo: capsule Pimicotinib(ABSK021): capsule |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Assessed by central read using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (Version 1.1) | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Baseline to Week 25 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Tumor Volumn Score (TVS) | TVS is a semi-quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor. ORR was the percentage of participants who achieved either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as assessed by Blinded Independent Review Committee using TVS. | The ITT Set consisted of participants who were randomized to a study treatment regimen. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Baseline to Week 25 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (ROM) at Week 25 | Presented here is the change from baseline in ROM to Week 25. Measurement of the affected and contralateral, non-affected joint was assessed by goniometer and measured in degrees. At baseline, the motion with the smallest relative ROM value (worst) was identified, and this motion was used for evaluating the change in relative ROM subsequently. The affected joint measurement was used to derive a relative ROM based on the measurement relative to reference standard value provided by the American Medical Association. Relative ROM is expressed in percent: 100 x (joint ROM measure)/(reference ROM standard). | The analyzed population in the modeling of continuous endpoints would include all ITT participants who had both baseline and post-baseline available data. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Percent of range of motion | Baseline to Week 25 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 25 | The Worst Stiffness NRS is a single question that asks the participant to assess their worst stiffness in the last 24 hours. Participants rate their worst stiffness on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "no stiffness" and 10 is "worst imaginable." Lower scores represented better level of stiffness. | The analyzed population in the modeling of continuous endpoints would include all ITT participants who had both baseline and post-baseline available data. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline to Week 25 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain NRS Score at Week 25 | Participants reported responses to the BPI Worst Pain NRS. The BPI Worst Pain NRS ranged from 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "pain as bad as you can imagine." | The analyzed population in the modeling of continuous endpoints would include all ITT participants who had both baseline and post-baseline available data. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Score on a scale | Baseline to Week 25 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Score at Week 25 | All participants were asked 11 or 13 questions from the PROMIS-PF item bank. The questions used one of two 5-point verbal rating scales: either 1 = "unable to do", 2 = "with much difficulty", 3 = "with some difficulty", 4 = "with a little difficulty", and 5 = "without any difficulty"; or 1 = "cannot do", 2 = "quite a lot", 3 = "somewhat", 4 = "very little", and 5 = "not at all." The T-score rescales the total raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore, a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean. The T-score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better physical function status. | The analyzed population in the modeling of continuous endpoints would include all ITT participants who had both baseline and post-baseline available data. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | T-score | Baseline to Week 25 |
|
Collection of adverse events started from the signing of informed consent through safety follow-up (up to 5.9 months)
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Part 1 Pimicotinib(ABSK021) | Participants receive the blinded treatment of ABSK021 for 24 weeks in Part 1. Pimicotinib(ABSK021): capsule | 0 | 63 | 3 | 63 | 62 | 63 |
| EG001 | Part 1- Placebo | Participants receive the blinded treatment of matching placebo for 24 weeks in Part 1. Placebo: capsule | 0 | 31 | 1 | 31 | 27 | 31 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterocolitis infectious | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Blood pressure increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Erythema nodosum | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Prostate cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Face oedema | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fatigue | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pyrexia | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Asthenia | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Generalised oedema | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Influenza like illness | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Blood creatine phosphokinase increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Amylase increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Alpha hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Lipase increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Blood creatine phosphokinase MB (Myocardial Band) increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| High density lipoprotein increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Blood creatinine increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| White blood cell count decreased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Apolipoprotein A-I increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Blood cholesterol increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Neutrophil count decreased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Apolipoprotein B decreased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Blood alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Low density lipoprotein increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary occult blood positive | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urobilinogen urine increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Rash maculo-papular | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dermatitis acneiform | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Periorbital oedema | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Eyelid oedema | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Mouth ulceration | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypercholesterolaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypertriglyceridaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Haematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Palpitations | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Sinus bradycardia | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Heavy menstrual bleeding | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr Yi Liu, Senior Medical Director | Abbisko Therapeutics Co, Ltd | +86-21-68910052 | clinical@abbisko.cn |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Oct 30, 2024 | Apr 7, 2026 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000070779 | Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath |
| D013586 | Synovitis, Pigmented Villonodular |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005870 | Giant Cell Tumors |
| D009372 | Neoplasms, Connective Tissue |
| D018204 | Neoplasms, Connective and Soft Tissue |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D013585 | Synovitis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D052256 | Tendinopathy |
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Netherlands |
|
| United States |
|
| China |
|
| Poland |
|
| Italy |
|
| Spain |
|
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|