Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary objective of ARISE II is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the GORE® Ascending Stent Graft device in the treatment of lesions involving the ascending aorta and aortic arch.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASG device only in Ascending Aorta | Experimental | Ascending Aortic Isolated Lesions, Pseudoaneurysms and Penetrating Aortic Ulcers in subjects at high-risk for surgical repair, treated with endovascular repair using the ASG device alone. |
|
| ASG + TBE | Experimental | Ascending Aorta/Aortic Arch Isolated Lesions and Chronic De Novo Dissections in subjects at high-risk for surgical repair, treated with endovascular repair using the ASG and TBE devices. |
|
| Surgical Follow-up Cohort | Other | Open surgical repair of ascending aorta in subjects at high-risk for surgical repair |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device) | Device | Endovascular aortic repair of the ascending aorta |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary effectiveness endpoint as measured by device technical success and absence of reintervention. | The primary effectiveness endpoint is a composite of the following events through one month post procedure: Device Technical Success and Absence of Reintervention. Technical Success is defined as including:
Absence of reintervention is defined as: The absence of unanticipated additional procedures related to the device, procedure, or withdrawal of the delivery system | 30 Days |
| Primary Safety Endpoint as measured by a composite of the absence of aortic rupture, lesion-related mortality, disabling stroke, permanent paraplegia, permanent paraparesis, and new onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis. | The primary safety endpoint is a composite of the following events through 30 days post endovascular procedure:
| 30 Days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary endpoints as measured as a composite of procedural and treatment success. | Two secondary endpoints are planned for the study with no inferential analysis. Composite endpoint of procedural success elements measured at one month follow-up Composite endpoint of treatment success elements measured at all appropriate follow-up windows | 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria: ASG Device Alone Arm
The patient is/has:
Ascending Aortic pathologies warranting surgical repair compatible with the treatment requirements of the ASG device meeting any of the following criteria: Aneurysm
Anatomic compatibility with ASG device based on Gore Imaging Sciences review.
Considered high-risk for open surgical repair by meeting any of the following criteria:
Age ≥18 years at time of informed consent signature
Adequate vascular access via transfemoral or retroperitoneal approach
Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed by the subject or legally authorized representative
Agrees to comply with protocol requirements, including imaging and 5-year follow-up
Exclusion Criteria: ASG Device Alone Arm
The patient is/has:
Inclusion Criteria: ASG + TBE Device Arm
The patient is/has:
Ascending and/or Arch Aortic pathologies warranting surgical repair compatible with the treatment requirements of the ASG device and meeting any of the following criteria: Aneurysms
Fusiform aneurysm (≥55 mm or documented growth rate >0.5cm/year)
Saccular aneurysm (no diameter criteria)
Pseudoaneurysms (>30 days post-surgery, no diameter criteria) Non-aneurysms
Penetrating Aortic Ulcers (no diameter criteria)
Pseudoaneurysms, following open surgical repair of a Type A dissection (>30 days post-surgery, no diameter criteria)
Chronic de novo (>90 days) Type A aortic dissection requiring treatment
Residual aortic dissection following surgical repair of Type A aortic dissection requiring treatment (>30 days post-surgery)
Anatomic compatibility with ASG device used in combination with the TBE Device based on Gore Imaging Sciences review.
Proximal Aortic Landing Zone:
Branch Vessel Landing Zone:
Distal Aortic Landing Zone:
Considered high-risk for open surgical repair by meeting any of the following criteria:
Age ≥18 years at time of informed consent signature
Adequate vascular access via transfemoral or retroperitoneal approach
Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed by the subject or legally authorized representative
Agrees to comply with protocol requirements, including imaging and 5-year follow-up
Exclusion Criteria: ASG + TBE Device Arm
The patient is/has:
Inclusion Criteria: Surgical Follow-up Cohort
Subjects who meet the following criteria will be followed:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Eric Roselli, MD | The Cleveland Clinic | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Alabama at Birmingham | Birmingham | Alabama | 35233 | United States | ||
| MemorialCare Heart and Vascular Institute - Long Beach Medical Center |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| GORE® Thoracic Aortic Graft Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE Device) | Device | Endovascular aortic repair of the ascending aorta/aortic arch |
|
|
| Surgery | Procedure | Open surgical repair of the ascending aorta and/or the aortic arch |
|
| Secondary endpoint as measured by Short Form-36® physical component summary (PCS) | Short Form-36® PCS measured at the one year follow-up visit with inferential analysis | 12 months |
| Long Beach |
| California |
| 90806 |
| United States |
| Keck Medical Center University of Southern California, HCC II | Los Angeles | California | 90033 | United States |
| Cedars Sinai Medical Center | Los Angeles | California | 90048 | United States |
| Stanford Hospital | Stanford | California | 94305 | United States |
| University of Colorado Hospital Authority | Aurora | Colorado | 80045 | United States |
| Hartford Hospital | Hartford | Connecticut | 06102 | United States |
| MedStar Washington Hospital Center | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20010 | United States |
| University of Florida - Gainesville | Gainesville | Florida | 32610 | United States |
| University of South Florida | Tampa | Florida | 33606 | United States |
| Emory University Hospital | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| Northwestern University -Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Clinical Trials Unit | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| Indiana University School of Medicine | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46202 | United States |
| University of Maryland Medical Center | Baltimore | Maryland | 21201 | United States |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| University of Michigan Frankel Cardiovascular Center | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109 | United States |
| Corewell Health | Grand Rapids | Michigan | 49503 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic - Rochester | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| Washington University School of Medicine - St. Louis | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| Hackensack UMC | Hackensack | New Jersey | 07601 | United States |
| Westchester Medical Center | Valhalla | New York | 10595 | United States |
| University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27599 | United States |
| Atrium Health | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28204 | United States |
| Duke University Medical Center | Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
| Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
| OhioHealth Research and Innovation Institute | Columbus | Ohio | 43214 | United States |
| Oregon Health and Science University | Portland | Oregon | 97239 | United States |
| University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19105 | United States |
| University of Pittsburgh Medical Center | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15232 | United States |
| Lankenau Institute for Medical Research | Wynnewood | Pennsylvania | 19096 | United States |
| Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons | Austin | Texas | 78756 | United States |
| Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| The Heart Hospital at Baylor Plano | Plano | Texas | 75093 | United States |
| Intermountain Heart Institute | Murray | Utah | 84107 | United States |
| Inova Fairfax Medical Campus | Falls Church | Virginia | 22042 | United States |
| Sentara Mid Atlantic Cardiothoracic Surgeons | Norfolk | Virginia | 23507 | United States |
| University of Washington Medical Center | Seattle | Washington | 98195 | United States |
| West Virginia University Medicine | Morgantown | West Virginia | 26506 | United States |
| University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics | Madison | Wisconsin | 53792 | United States |
| Medical College of Wisconsin | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53226 | United States |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017545 | Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic |
| D017541 | Aneurysm, False |
| D000784 | Aortic Dissection |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001014 | Aortic Aneurysm |
| D000783 | Aneurysm |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D001018 | Aortic Diseases |
| D000094665 | Dissection, Blood Vessel |
| D000094683 | Acute Aortic Syndrome |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided