Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to evaluate the safety and performance of the QBX stent system in the treatment of PAD by reporting of peri- and postoperative complications, including major adverse vascular events (MAVE), Vascular Access Site Complications (VASCs) and bleeding at puncture site, and by evaluating the prevalence of Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR), amputations, procedural success, device performance, reduction in percentage diameter stenosis post-procedure compared to pre-procedure, artery patency, return to normal activity, Rutherford and Fontaine classification, quality of life (QoL), Ankle Brachial Index (ABI), and hospital- and patient-related costs in a prospectively maintained database.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| QBX (5F/6F) Peripheral Balloon Expandable Stent System |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBX (5F/6F) Peripheral Balloon Expandable Stent System | Device | The QBX Stent System is a flexible, balloon expandable stent, made of a cobalt chromium alloy manufactured by QualiMed Innovative Medizinprodukte GmbH. The design is suitable for peripheral vessel diameters from 5 to 10 mm. The QBX Stent System is available as 6F and 5F variations where the 6F system is mounted on an 0.035" over-the-wire delivery system, and the 5F is mounted on an 0.018" over-the-wire delivery system. Both are available in a full range of diameters and lengths. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To evaluate the cumulative rate of MAVE. | MAVE is defined as:
| 12-months follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of subjects with Vascular Access Site Complications (VASCs) within the first 24h after the index-procedure | VASCs are defined as:
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with PAD which are indicated to receive treatment with the QBX balloon-expandable stent and 5/6-French system through a femoral access with the aim to improve the vessel lumen diameter of target lesions (de novo and re-stenoses) in native peripheral arteries, e.g. external iliac artery (EIA), internal iliac artery (IIA), common iliac artery (CIA), superficial femoral artery (SFA) and deep femoral artery (DFA).
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dorien Haesen, PhD | Contact | +32 11 28 69 48 | dorien.haesen@archerresearch.eu |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk | Genk | Limburg | 3600 | Belgium |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 24 hours |
| Intra-operative complication rate. | Index-procedure |
| Post-operative complication rate. | 12-months follow-up |
| Intra-operative absence of bleeding at puncture site. | Index-procedure |
| Re-occlusion rate. | Re-occlusion is defined as complete occlusion of the target lesion initially treated. | 12-months follow-up |
| Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) rate. | TVR is defined as a procedure (endovascular or open surgical) due to a problem arising in the target vessel remote from the target lesion(s) initially treated. | 12-months follow-up |
| Amputation rate | Minor (below the ankle) and major (above the ankle) amputation rate at 12 months will be assessed. Major amputation rates must be reported as below-the-knee and above-the-knee amputations. | 12-months follow-up |
| Procedural success. | Procedural success is defined as a combination of technical success, device success and absence of procedural complications. | Index-procedure |
| Technical success | Technical success is defined as successful vascular access and completion of the endovascular procedure and immediate morphological success with less than 30% residual diameter reduction of the treated lesion on completion angiography. | Index-procedure |
| Device success. | Device success is defined as exact deployment of the device according to the instructions for use. | Index-procedure |
| Device performance. | Scored using the following components and a dedicated Scoring System (1: Very good, 2: Good, 3: Sufficient, Poor: 4):
| Index-procedure |
| Reduction in percentage diameter stenosis post-procedure compared to pre-procedure. | Assessed via CT angio. | Index-procedure |
| Artery patency. | A duplex ultrasound will be performed to evaluate artery patency. If reliable duplex ultrasound assessment of artery patency is not possible, ABI is a good indication of patency. If ABI is abnormal and the patient is experiencing symptoms, a CT angio or other imaging module might be performed according to standard of care. | 1-month follow-up |
| Artery patency. | A duplex ultrasound will be performed to evaluate artery patency. If reliable duplex ultrasound assessment of artery patency is not possible, ABI is a good indication of patency. If ABI is abnormal and the patient is experiencing symptoms, a CT angio or other imaging module might be performed according to standard of care. | 6-months follow-up |
| Artery patency. | A duplex ultrasound will be performed to evaluate artery patency. If reliable duplex ultrasound assessment of artery patency is not possible, ABI is a good indication of patency. If ABI is abnormal and the patient is experiencing symptoms, a CT angio or other imaging module might be performed according to standard of care. | 12-months follow-up |
| Return to normal activity. | The number of days until return to normal activities will be assessed. | 1-month follow-up |
| Distribution of Rutherford classes during follow-up as compared to baseline. | The percentage of patients with Rutherford classes 0 to 6 will be determined. | 1-month follow-up |
| Distribution of Rutherford classes during follow-up as compared to baseline. | The percentage of patients with Rutherford classes 0 to 6 will be determined. | 6-months follow-up |
| Distribution of Rutherford classes during follow-up as compared to baseline. | The percentage of patients with Rutherford classes 0 to 6 will be determined. | 12-months follow-up |
| Distribution of Fontaine stages during follow-up as compared to baseline. | The percentage of patients with Fontaine stages I to IV will be determined. | 1-month follow-up |
| Distribution of Fontaine stages during follow-up as compared to baseline. | The percentage of patients with Fontaine stages I to IV will be determined. | 6-months follow-up |
| Distribution of Fontaine stages during follow-up as compared to baseline. | The percentage of patients with Fontaine stages I to IV will be determined. | 12-months follow-up |
| Primary sustained clinical improvement at 12 months. | Primary sustained clinical improvement is defined as sustained upward shift of at least one category on the Rutherford/Fontaine classification without the need for repeated TLR in surviving patients. | 12-months follow-up |
| Secondary sustained clinical improvement at 12 months. | Secondary sustained clinical improvement is defined as sustained upward shift of at least one category on the Rutherford/Fontaine classification including the need for repeated TLR in surviving patients. | 12-months follow-up |
| Improvement in disease-related health status, functioning and quality of life at follow-up as compared to baseline. | This is scored by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire and EQ-5D questionnaire. | 1-month follow-up |
| Improvement in disease-related health status, functioning and quality of life at follow-up as compared to baseline. | This is scored by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire and EQ-5D questionnaire. | 6-months follow-up |
| Improvement in disease-related health status, functioning and quality of life at follow-up as compared to baseline. | This is scored by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire and EQ-5D questionnaire. | 12-months follow-up |
| Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) during follow-up as compared to baseline. | 1-month follow-up |
| Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) during follow-up as compared to baseline. | 6-months follow-up |
| Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) during follow-up as compared to baseline. | 12-months follow-up |
| Occurrence of prolonged hospitalization compared to local standard of care (SOC). | When the patient leaves the hospital after the procedure. | Immediately after the procedure |
| Time taken off from work for the procedure | Consists of:
| 1-month follow-up |
| Jessa Ziekenhuis | Hasselt | Limburg | 3500 | Belgium |
|
| AZ Groeninge | Kortrijk | West-Vlaanderen | 8500 | Belgium |
|
| HIS IZZ | Brussels | 1040/1050 | Belgium |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058729 | Peripheral Arterial Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050197 | Atherosclerosis |
| D001161 | Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D016491 | Peripheral Vascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided