Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Slow recruitment rate
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate electrocardiogram (ECG) changes in 100 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to assess new-onset conduction abnormalities, such as atrioventricular nodal block (AVB) (1st, 2nd, or 3rd degree), or new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) that may occur during the procedure. Eligible patients enrolled in this study will be monitored with an FDA-approved ECG Holter system during TAVR, to assess intra-procedural changes. This will be a small-scale, early feasibility study performed to inform a future, larger-scale prospective investigation.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a well-established alternative to surgical intervention for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) (1-4). The rates of most TAVR complications have declined over time due to the improvement of operator experience and technological advancement; however, conduction abnormalities continue to persist (5). New-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) and atrioventricular nodal block (AVB) are among the most common conduction disturbances (6). Additionally, there is an increased incidence of delayed (after discharge) HAVB (2nd-degree AVB Mobitz type 2 or 3rd-degree AVB) in patients with preexisting (pre-TAVR) right bundle branch block (RBBB) and new-onset LBBB post-TAVR, 13.2%, and 8.5%, respectively (7).
Currently, conduction disturbances post-TAVR are assessed via post-procedural ECG, and physicians performing TAVR are not provided feedback in real time. The use of intraprocedural ECG could provide insight into the status of the heart's conduction system during TAVR and prevent irreversible injury, requiring post-procedural monitoring at intensive cardiac care unit (usually with a temporary pacemaker in situ) or even permanent pacemaker implantation. Furthermore, given the increased incidence of HAVB after valve replacement in patients with preexisting RBBB and new-onset LBBB, continued post-procedural ECG monitoring in this particular subset of patients may provide more information on the progression of conduction disturbances after TAVR.
This will be a small-scale, early feasibility study evaluating intra-procedural ECG changes, such as AVB (1st, 2nd, or 3rd degree), or new-onset LBBB, in patients undergoing TAVR, to inform a future, larger scale, prospective investigation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ECG Monitoring -TAVR patients | Continuous ECG monitoring of Conduction Disturbances in patients undergoing TAVR procedure |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECG monitoring | Device | Intra-procedural ECG changes during TAVR |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Identifying ECG changes during the TAVR procedure | Identifying intra-procedural ECG changes (such as prolongation of the PR interval or QRS or changes in QRS axis) that may be associated with post TAVR persistent conduction disturbances (AVB or LBBB) at discharge. LBBB). | 14 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Identifying predictors of conduction disturbances (AVB or LBBB) after TAVR | Identifying predictors on intra-procedural ECG for late-onset (after discharge) high degree AVB. | 30 days |
| Evaluating rates of conduction disturbances (AVB or LBBB) after TAVR |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects with a diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing TAVR with a commercially available valve, who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria, will be eligible for participation in this study.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Shmuel Chen, MD, PhD | The Weill Cornell Medicine | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Weill Cornell Medicine | New York | New York | 10065 | United States |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015716 | Electrocardiography, Ambulatory |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004562 | Electrocardiography |
| D006334 | Heart Function Tests |
| D003935 | Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Evaluating rates of late-onset (after discharge) high-degree AVB (HAVB = second-degree AVB Mobitz type 2 or third-degree AVB) after TAVR. |
| 30 days |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D004568 | Electrodiagnosis |
| D018670 | Monitoring, Ambulatory |
| D008991 | Monitoring, Physiologic |