Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Zurich | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to compare two different spinal manual therapy interventions of the back to determine if they are viable and acceptable for a future study investigating the treatment of patients with back pain. The two proposed spinal manual therapy interventions are widely used in the fields of chiropractic, physical therapy, osteopathy, and manual medicine to treat back pain and improve function. This is a randomized study, meaning that participants are randomly assigned (like tossing a coin) to one of two manual spinal therapy interventions.
Clinical trials of spinal manual therapy interventions for back pain and back-related leg pain face methodological challenges regarding the design of effective sham control ('control' hereafter) and blinding of the assigned interventions. Although the assessment of blinding is often neglected in the field of manual medicine, the implementation of high-quality trials of spinal manual therapy interventions warrants formal evaluation of blinding feasibility among participants and outcome assessors to advance randomized clinical trial methods and design.
The objectives of this blinding feasibility trial are:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active spinal manual therapy protocol | Active Comparator | (1) Side-lying lumbar spine manipulation, (2) prone lumbar spine mobilization, and (3) prone thoracic spine manipulation. |
|
| Control spinal manual therapy protocol | Sham Comparator | (1) Control side-lying lumbar spine manipulation, (2) control prone lumbar spine mobilization, and (3) control prone thoracic spine manipulation. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active spinal manual therapy protocol | Procedure | The chiropractor will start by (1) placing one hand over L4-L5 or L5-S1 and then will apply a high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust with a therapeutic line of drive. Side-lying lumbar manipulation will be performed bilaterally, with the treating clinician choosing any suitable technique and with or without occurrence of the characteristic audible joint cavitation associated with spine manipulation. The chiropractor will then perform (2) prone lumbar mobilisation by placing the contact hand and applying downward pressure over L4-L5 or L5-S1 with the other hand guiding a manual flexion-distraction piece to apply therapeutic mobilization of the lumbar spine. The chiropractor will deliver (3) a prone thoracic manipulation by placing two hands over the transverse processes of T5-T6 or T6-T7 and applying a HVLA thrust in a posterior-to-anterior direction. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Participant blinding success, as measured by the validated Bang blinding index, immediately after intervention session 1. | The blinding assessment survey item will ask: "Which treatment do you believe you received?" with five response options provided: "Strongly believe I received the genuine treatment," "Somewhat believe I received the genuine treatment," "Somewhat believe I received the control treatment," "Strongly believe I received the control treatment," and "I do not know which treatment I received." Bang BI estimates (between -1 to +1, with 0 indicating satisfactory blinding) can be interpreted as the proportion of correct guesses beyond chance within an intervention arm. For the Bang BI, a score with an absolute value of ≤0.3 (i.e., -0.3 to 0.3) will be deemed compatible with satisfactory blinding, and blinding scenarios will be discussed. | Immediately after intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Participant blinding success, as measured by the validated Bang blinding index, immediately after intervention session 2. | The blinding assessment survey item will ask: "Which treatment do you believe you received?" with five response options provided: "Strongly believe I received the genuine treatment," "Somewhat believe I received the genuine treatment," "Somewhat believe I received the control treatment," "Strongly believe I received the control treatment," and "I do not know which treatment I received." Bang BI estimates (between -1 to +1, with 0 indicating satisfactory blinding) can be interpreted as the proportion of correct guesses beyond chance within an intervention arm. For the Bang BI, a score with an absolute value of ≤0.3 (i.e., -0.3 to 0.3) will be deemed compatible with satisfactory blinding, and blinding scenarios will be discussed. | Immediately after intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Participant blinding success, as measured by the validated James blinding index, immediately after intervention session 1. | The James BI, a modification of the kappa statistic that measures disagreement beyond chance, returns a value between 0 and 1, with 1 equal to all "don't know" responses (complete blinding), 0 equal to all correct responses (complete unblinding), and 0.5 where respondents' responses appear random (50% correct, 50% incorrect). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Lumbar spine range of motion, immediately before intervention session 1. | Maximum active total flexion and extension (0 to 100+ degrees) in standing position, measured with a validated mobile phone measuring device. Higher scores represent higher flexibility. | Immediately before intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Cesar A Hincapié, DC PhD | Balgrist University Hospital and University of Zurich | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balgrist University Hospital and CHIROMED Praxis im Seefeld | Zurich | 8008 | Switzerland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39810207 | Derived | Munoz Laguna J, Kurmann A, Hofstetter L, Nyantakyi E, Braun J, Clack L, Bang H, Farshad M, Foster NE, Puhan MA, Hincapie CA; SALuBRITY Blinding Clinician Group. 'Which treatment do you believe you received?' A randomised blinding feasibility trial of spinal manual therapy. Chiropr Man Therap. 2025 Jan 14;33(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12998-024-00561-0. | |
| 38698433 |
Not provided
Not provided
The central contact person and principal investigator will make supporting information available upon reasonable request.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001416 | Back Pain |
| D017116 | Low Back Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Two-parallel-group, single-centre, sham-controlled, methodological blinding feasibility randomised trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Participants, managing clinicians, outcome assessors, data analysts, and investigators will be blinded to intervention assigned. Only treating clinicians will not be blinded to the interventions but will be trained and asked not to disclose the intervention, nature of the interventions, nor trial objectives to trial participants or other members of the trial team.
|
| Control spinal manual therapy protocol | Procedure | (1) Control side-lying lumbar manipulation will be operationalised as the application of a low-velocity broad push manoeuvre to the gluteal region following a non-therapeutic line of drive. The chiropractor will then perform (2) control prone lumbar mobilisation, consisting of a non-therapeutic manual manoeuvre involving minimal oscillations (0 to ±2°) of the flexion-distraction piece with light touch over the lumbar spine region, and (3) control prone thoracic mobilisation consisting of two-handed left and right scapula pushes with a nontherapeutic line of drive. |
|
| Immediately after intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Participant blinding success, as measured by the validated James blinding index, immediately after intervention session 2. | The James BI, a modification of the kappa statistic that measures disagreement beyond chance, returns a value between 0 and 1, with 1 equal to all "don't know" responses (complete blinding), 0 equal to all correct responses (complete unblinding), and 0.5 where respondents' responses appear random (50% correct, 50% incorrect). | Immediately after intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Outcome assessor blinding success, as measured by the validated Bang index, immediately after intervention session 1. | Bang BI estimates (between -1 to +1, with 0 indicating satisfactory blinding) can be interpreted as the proportion of correct guesses beyond chance within an intervention arm. | Immediately after intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Outcome assessor blinding success, as measured by the validated Bang index, immediately after intervention session 2. | Bang BI estimates (between -1 to +1, with 0 indicating satisfactory blinding) can be interpreted as the proportion of correct guesses beyond chance within an intervention arm. | Immediately after intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Outcome assessor blinding success, as measured by the validated James index, immediately after intervention session 1. | The James BI measures disagreement beyond chance and returns a value between 0 and 1, with 1 equal to all "don't know" responses (complete blinding), 0 equal to all correct responses (complete unblinding), and 0.5 where respondents' responses appear random (50% correct, 50% incorrect). | Immediately after intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Outcome assessor blinding success, as measured by the validated James index, immediately after intervention session 2. | The James BI measures disagreement beyond chance and returns a value between 0 and 1, with 1 equal to all "don't know" responses (complete blinding), 0 equal to all correct responses (complete unblinding), and 0.5 where respondents' responses appear random (50% correct, 50% incorrect). | Immediately after intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Lumbar spine range of motion, immediately after intervention session 1. |
Maximum active total flexion and extension (0 to 100+ degrees) in standing position, measured with a validated mobile phone measuring device. Higher scores represent higher flexibility. |
| Immediately after intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Lumbar spine range of motion, immediately before intervention session 2. | Maximum active total flexion and extension (0 to 100+ degrees) in standing position, measured with a validated mobile phone measuring device. Higher scores represent higher flexibility. | Immediately before intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Lumbar spine range of motion, immediately after intervention session 2. | Maximum active total flexion and extension (0 to 100+ degrees) in standing position, measured with a validated mobile phone measuring device. Higher scores represent higher flexibility. | Immediately after intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Self-rated general health, immediately before intervention session 1. | Participants will answer the question "In general, would you say your health is" with five possible ordinal answers: "Excellent," "Very good," "Good," "Fair," and "Poor" (from the PROMIS tool). | Immediately before intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Self-rated general health, immediately after intervention session 1. | Participants will answer the question "In general, would you say your health is" with five possible ordinal answers: "Excellent," "Very good," "Good," "Fair," and "Poor" (from the PROMIS tool). | Immediately after intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Self-rated general health, immediately before intervention session 2. | Participants will answer the question "In general, would you say your health is" with five possible ordinal answers: "Excellent," "Very good," "Good," "Fair," and "Poor" (from the PROMIS tool). | Immediately after intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Self-rated general health, immediately after intervention session 2. | Participants will answer the question "In general, would you say your health is" with five possible ordinal answers: "Excellent," "Very good," "Good," "Fair," and "Poor" (from the PROMIS tool). | Immediately after intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Pain intensity, current, immediately before intervention session 1. | Participants will answer the question "What number best describes your current mid and low back pain?". Higher values represent higher levels of pain (10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine"; 0 = "no pain"). | Immediately before intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Pain intensity, current, immediately after intervention session 1. | Participants will answer the question "What number best describes your current mid and low back pain?". Higher values represent higher levels of pain (10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine"; 0 = "no pain"). | Immediately after intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Pain intensity, current, immediately before intervention session 2. | Participants will answer the question "What number best describes your current mid and low back pain?". Higher values represent higher levels of pain (10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine"; 0 = "no pain"). | Immediately before intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Pain intensity, current, immediately after intervention session 2. | Participants will answer the question "What number best describes your current mid and low back pain?". Higher values represent higher levels of pain (10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine"; 0 = "no pain"). | Immediately after intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Pain intensity, past week, immediately before intervention session 1. | Participants will answer the question "What number best describes your mid and low back pain on average in the past week?". Higher values represent higher levels of pain (10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine"; 0 = "no pain"). | Immediately before intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Pain intensity, past week, immediately before intervention session 2. | Participants will answer the question "What number best describes your mid and low back pain on average in the past week?". Higher values represent higher levels of pain (10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine"; 0 = "no pain"). | Immediately before intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Satisfaction with care, immediately after intervention session 1. | Participants will answer the question "I am satisfied with the care I received today" with five possible ordinal answers: "Strongly agree", "Agree", "Uncertain", "Disagree", "Strongly disagree" (from The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form [PSQ-18]). | Immediately after intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Satisfaction with care, immediately after intervention session 2. | Participants will answer the question "I am satisfied with the care I received today" with five possible ordinal answers: "Strongly agree", "Agree", "Uncertain", "Disagree", "Strongly disagree" (from The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form [PSQ-18]). | Immediately after intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Back function - self-reported flexibility, immediately before intervention session 1. | Participants will answer the question "How would you rate your back flexibility at the moment?" (adapted from The International Fitness Scale [IFIS]). | Immediately before intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Back function - self-reported flexibility, immediately after intervention session 1. | Participants will answer the question "How would you rate your back flexibility at the moment?" (adapted from The International Fitness Scale [IFIS]). | Immediately after intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Back function - self-reported flexibility, immediately before intervention session 2. | Participants will answer the question "How would you rate your back flexibility at the moment?" (adapted from The International Fitness Scale [IFIS]). | Immediately before intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Back function - self-reported flexibility, immediately after intervention session 2. | Participants will answer the question "How would you rate your back flexibility at the moment?" (adapted from The International Fitness Scale [IFIS]). | Immediately after intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Back function - self-reported back function, immediately before intervention session 1. | Self-reported current back function (numerical rating scale, 0 to 10). Higher values represent higher levels of back function (10 = "Best possible back function", 0 = "Worst possible back function"). | Immediately before intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Back function - self-reported back function, immediately after intervention session 1. | Self-reported current back function (numerical rating scale, 0 to 10). Higher values represent higher levels of back function (10 = "Best possible back function", 0 = "Worst possible back function"). | Immediately after intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Back function - self-reported back function, immediately before intervention session 2. | Self-reported current back function (numerical rating scale, 0 to 10). Higher values represent higher levels of back function (10 = "Best possible back function", 0 = "Worst possible back function"). | Immediately before intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Back function - self-reported back function, immediately after intervention session 2. | Self-reported current back function (numerical rating scale, 0 to 10). Higher values represent higher levels of back function (10 = "Best possible back function", 0 = "Worst possible back function"). | Immediately after intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Back function - self-reported ache, pain, discomfort in the mid and low back, immediately before intervention 1. | Ache, pain, discomfort in the mid and low back, by asking "During the past week, have you experienced ache, pain, discomfort in your mid and low back?" (adapted from the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire). | Immediately before intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Back function - self-reported ache, pain, discomfort in the mid and low back, immediately before intervention 2. | Ache, pain, discomfort in the mid and low back, by asking "During the past week, have you experienced ache, pain, discomfort in your mid and low back?" (adapted from the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire). | Immediately before intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Participant's reasons for beliefs about intervention assigned, immediately after intervention session 1. | Following the blinding assessment for the primary and secondary outcomes, participants will be asked the free text question, "Why do you believe you received this treatment?". | Immediately after intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Participant's reasons for beliefs about intervention assigned, immediately after intervention session 2. | Following the blinding assessment for the primary and secondary outcomes, participants will be asked the free text question, "Why do you believe you received this treatment?". | Immediately after intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Outcome assessor's reasons for beliefs about intervention assigned, immediately after intervention session 1. | Following the blinding assessment for the primary and secondary outcomes, outcome assessors will be asked the free text question, "Why do you believe this participant received this treatment?". | Immediately after intervention session 1 (study day 1) |
| Outcome assessor's reasons for beliefs about intervention assigned, immediately after intervention session 2. | Following the blinding assessment for the primary and secondary outcomes, outcome assessors will be asked the free text question, "Why do you believe this participant received this treatment?". | Immediately after intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Participant credibility/expectancy of active and control interventions, as measured with the credibility/expectancy questionnaire, immediately after intervention session 2. | Participants will complete the six items from the credibility/expectancy questionnaire with a hypothetical scenario: "For the following six questions, imagine that you were experiencing uncomfortable low back pain and were exposed to the treatment you received for a period of about 8 weeks." Item 1: "At this point, how logical would the SMT treatment offered to you seem?" Item 2: "At this point, how successful do you think this SMT treatment would be in reducing your symptoms?" Item 3: "How confident would you be in recommending this SMT treatment to a friend experiencing similar symptoms?" Item 4: "By the end of the SMT treatment period, how much improvement in your symptoms do you think would occur?" Item 5: "At this point, how much do you really feel that this SMT treatment would help you to reduce your symptoms?" Item 6: "By the end of the SMT period, how much improvement in your symptoms do you really feel would occur?" Higher values represent higher credibility and expectancy. | Immediately after intervention session 2 (study day 2, between 48 hours and 2 weeks after study day 1) |
| Munoz Laguna J, Kurmann A, Hofstetter L, Nyantakyi E, Clack L, Bang H, Foster NE, Braun J, Puhan MA, Farshad M, Hincapie CA. Feasibility of blinding spinal manual therapy interventions among participants and outcome assessors: protocol for a blinding feasibility trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 May 2;10(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01492-6. |