Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
the purpose of the study is to evaluate the software usability and patient's adherence from five vision rehabilitation centres. In addition, the effect and benefits of a customizable telerehabilitation program were tested.
The software is used in our practice for every day vision rehabilitation training.
So it is part of our routine medical care, and a we are going to study studies the effect of the intervention in several different centers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Telerehabilitation | Device | The home visual telerehabilitation path using the EyeFitness software consisted of performing one visual training session per day, 5 days a week (from Monday to Friday) for a total of 6 weeks. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Utility of EyeFitness telerehabilitation | The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of the EyeFitness telerehabilitation software and the adherence of patients to the treatment. In order to evaluate the utility of the software the primary outcome measures were PSSUQ Version 3 scores defined as Overall, System Usefulness (Sysuse), Information Quality (Infoqual), Interface Quality (Iterqual). | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Effect of treatment | The secondary outcome measures selected for the effectiveness analysis were distance Best Corrected Visual Acuity, MNRead reading acuity, reading speed (words per minute), contrast sensitivity (at Pelli - Robson charts) and fixation stability according to Microperimeter exame classification. | 6 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All patients were eligible if they were over 18 years old and had a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between 1.3 logMAR and 0.4 LogMAR and/or a visual field of less than 60%, according to the WHO classification.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS | Rome | 00168 | Italy |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014786 | Vision Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012678 | Sensation Disorders |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069350 | Telerehabilitation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| D000359 | Aftercare |
| D003266 | Continuity of Patient Care |
| D005791 | Patient Care |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D012816 |
| Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D013812 |
| Therapeutics |
| D006296 | Health Services |
| D005159 | Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services |
| D017216 | Telemedicine |
| D003695 | Delivery of Health Care |
| D010346 | Patient Care Management |
| D006298 | Health Services Administration |