Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Former PI left the institution so enrollment was closed early.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The two goals of this study are to establish a standardized method of assessing the pelvic floor for patients undergoing pelvic radiation and to determine the feasibility of inverse-RT planning using MRI to identify dosimetric constraints of the pelvic floor musculature for use in radiation planning. The investigators hypothesize that an exam-based diagnostic tool will provide more information about the areas of injury related to pelvic radiation than patient-reported outcomes, and could be used in future studies of preventive strategies. An exam-based tool will also allow measurement of the pain dose-response to radiation treatment of specific areas, which could be excluded from radiation fields during treatment planning.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single-digit pelvic exam | Experimental |
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single digit pelvic exam | Procedure | The exam takes approximately 5 minutes and uses a single digit to palpate the pelvic floor muscles, during which patients will rate pain on a scale of 0-10 at 5 paired locations. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of patient-reported symptoms as measured by EORTC QLQ-CX2 compared to findings of single digit pelvic exam | An exam will be considered positive for PFMD if pain at any examined site is reported as greater than or equal to four (>4) out of 10. The EORTC QLQ-CX2 contains 24 items scored 1-4 by frequency with which the patient experiences each. The minimum possible score is 24, and maximum 96, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life. The questionnaire will be considered positive if any vaginal, sexual, or genitourinary module question is rated 4 and otherwise will be analyzed as a continuous variable. | Prior to starting treatment, at treatment mid-point (3 weeks after treatment), at end of treatment (after 6 weeks of treatment), and at 6 month follow-up visit after end of treatment |
| Comparison of patient-reported symptoms as measured by PFDI-20 compared to findings of single digit pelvic exam | An exam will be considered positive for PFMD if pain at any examined site is reported as >4 out of 10. The PFDI-20 includes 20 items in three domains and provides a scaled score of 0-100 indicating how much a patient is bothered by pelvic floor-related issues. The questionnaire will be considered positive if the scaled score is greater than or equal to 16, indicating at least "moderate distress" and otherwise will be analyzed as a continuous variable. | Prior to starting treatment, at treatment mid-point (3 weeks after treatment), at end of treatment (after 6 weeks of treatment), and at 6 month follow-up visit after end of treatment |
| Comparison of patient-reported symptoms as measured by PFIQ-7 compared to findings of single digit pelvic exam | An exam will be considered positive for PFMD if pain at any examined site is reported as >4 out of 10. The PFIQ-7 includes 7 items each repeated across three domains and provides a scaled score and total score indicating how much a patient is bothered by pelvic floor-related issues. The questionnaire does not have an established severity scale, and therefore will be analyzed as a simple continuous variable. | Prior to starting treatment, at treatment mid-point (3 weeks after treatment), at end of treatment (after 6 weeks of treatment), and at 6 month follow-up visit after end of treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time course of pelvic floor dysfunction evolution over the course of treatment for cervical cancer using pelvic exam | Continuous variables of scales and total scores will be calculated for the exam at each time point and represented in spider-type plots. Results of the exam will be analyzed using the thresholds described in the primary outcome measure, and frequencies of positive scores reported for each time point. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria - Prospective Cohort
Exclusion Criteria - Prospective Cohort
Inclusion Criteria - Retrospective Cohort (historical control)
Exclusion Criteria - Retrospective Cohort (historical control)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Premal Thaker, M.D. | Washington University School of Medicine | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washington University School of Medicine | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002583 | Uterine Cervical Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014594 | Uterine Neoplasms |
| D005833 | Genital Neoplasms, Female |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Through completion of follow-up (estimated to be 6 months) |
| Time course of pelvic floor dysfunction evolution over the course of treatment for cervical cancer using the EORTC QLQ-CX2 scores | Continuous variables of scales and total scores will be calculated for the questionnaires at each time point and represented in spider-type plots. Results of the questionnaire will be analyzed using the thresholds described in the primary outcome measure, and frequencies of positive scores reported for each time point. | Through completion of follow-up (estimated to be 6 months) |
| Time course of pelvic floor dysfunction evolution over the course of treatment for cervical cancer using the PFDI-20 scores | Continuous variables of scales and total scores will be calculated for the questionnaires at each time point and represented in spider-type plots. Results of the questionnaire will be analyzed using the thresholds described in the primary outcome measure, and frequencies of positive scores reported for each time point. | Through completion of follow-up (estimated to be 6 months) |
| Time course of pelvic floor dysfunction evolution over the course of treatment for cervical cancer using the PFIQ-7 scores | Continuous variables of scales and total scores will be calculated for the questionnaires at each time point and represented in spider-type plots. Results of the questionnaire will be analyzed using the thresholds described in the primary outcome measure, and frequencies of positive scores reported for each time point. | Through completion of follow-up (estimated to be 6 months) |
| Correlate radiation dose to pelvic floor structures with symptom severity by questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-CX2, PFDI-20, and PFIQ-7) and physical exam | Continuous variables of scales and total scores, as well as specific scores for radiation-exposed structures on exam, will be compared to dosimetric assessments of exposure of pelvic floor structures. | Through completion of follow-up (estimated to be 6 months) |
| Determine structure level radiation dose to complex functional pelvic structures | Standard dosimetric values will be calculated for each specific pelvic floor structure evaluated on exam. | Through completion of follow-up (estimated to be 6 months) |
| Frequency of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction symptoms in split-field IMRT patients compared to historical controls | Historical controls will be queried via chart review for dosimetric values in archived radiation treatment plans and compared to current gynecologic radiation standards. These patients will also undergo thorough chart review for subsequent diagnoses of pelvic floor-related disorders and compared to the diagnosis rate using the proposed screening tools in this study. | Through completion of follow-up (estimated to be 6 months) |
| D009369 |
| Neoplasms |
| D002577 | Uterine Cervical Diseases |
| D014591 | Uterine Diseases |
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |