Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Paired associative stimulation (PAS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation protocol, where two stimuli (a peripheral and a cortical one, the latter delivered with transcranial magnetic stimulation - TMS) are repeatedly associated to enhance plasticity in the brain. In the present study, a new cross-modal, visuo-motor PAS protocol - called "mirror-PAS"- will be tested as a possible non-invasive brain stimulation treatment in neurological rehabilitation to promote motor recovery and pain reduction.
Participants will perform the standard PAS targeting the motor system and the recently developed mirror-PAS in two separate sessions. The investigators will compare the possible effect of the protocols in terms of neurophysiological and behavioral outcomes to identify the optimal PAS method to enhance plasticity and promote sensory-motor function.
The motor recovery of the upper limb function, particularly of the hand, is challenging in neurological rehabilitation. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation that can enhance motor recovery, though promoting brain plasticity of the brain.
In this study, researchers will use a TMS protocol called Paired Associative Stimulation (PAS), in which two stimuli (e.g., a cortical stimulus - delivered with TMS - and a peripheral stimulus) are repeatedly associated to promote associative plasticity in the primary motor cortex (M1).
The objective is to explore the clinical efficacy of a newly developed cross-modal PAS protocol -the so-called "mirror-PAS"- as a possible motor rehabilitation treatment in patients with upper limb motor disorders, investigating its neurophysiological and behavioural effects. The innovative aspect of mirror-PAS is to act on a more extended visuomotor network, featured by the functional properties of the mirror neuron system (MNS). Indeed, in the mirror-PAS, a visual stimulus depicting a hand movement is repeatedly paired with a TMS pulse over M1. In the healthy, this protocol was found effective in modulating neurophysiological responses of the motor cortex (i..e, MEPs), hence inducing these effects bypassing the afferent somatosensory pathway exploited by the standard PAS protocols. This may represent a clinical advantage allowing the promotion of motor recovery through the induction of a plastic reorganization in the damaged motor system by gaining access through a potentially spared MNS.
The project's first phase aims to assess the motor and neurophysiological effects of mirror-PAS in stroke patients with upper-limb hemiparesis, compared to the standard excitatory M1-PAS (whose effects are well known in the literature, even if still debated).
In the second phase, we will test the efficacy of the mirror-PAS in a population of amputated patients affected by phantom limb pain (PLP).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Phase 1] Stroke patients with upper-limb hemiparesis | Experimental |
| |
| [Phase 2] Patients with phantom limb pain (PLP) | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Device | The standard PAS protocol will be compared with the mirrorPAS protocol. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline in motor-evoked potentials (MEP) | [Phase 1, only in stroke patients] peak-to-peak MEP amplitude | At baseline and after the administration of the PAS protocols |
| Change in functional mapping of phantom limb cortical areas | [Phase 2, only in PLP patients] | At baseline and after the administration of the PAS protocols |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion criteria for stroke patients:
Exclusion criteria for stroke patients:
Inclusion criteria for PLP patients:
Exclusion criteria for PLP patients:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Bolognini, PhD | Contact | +390261911 | 6127 | n.bolognini@auxologico.it |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nadia Bolognini, PhD | Laboratorio di Neuropsicologia, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS | Recruiting | Milan | Lombardy | 20122 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34302877 | Background | Guidali G, Roncoroni C, Bolognini N. Paired associative stimulations: Novel tools for interacting with sensory and motor cortical plasticity. Behav Brain Res. 2021 Sep 24;414:113484. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113484. Epub 2021 Jul 21. | |
| 32289688 | Background | Guidali G, Carneiro MIS, Bolognini N. Paired Associative Stimulation drives the emergence of motor resonance. Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):627-636. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.01.017. Epub 2020 Feb 5. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| D010291 | Paresis |
| D010591 | Phantom Limb |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050781 | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055909 | Magnetic Field Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
In a first phase [Phase 1], the study aims to assess the motor and neurophysiological effects of a cross-modal 'mirror-PAS' protocol in stroke patients with upper-limb hemiparesis, compared to the standard excitatory M1-PAS.
In a second phase of the study [Phase 2], we will test the efficacy of the aforementioned cross-modal PAS in a population of amputated patients affected by phantom limb pain (PLP).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 30583983 | Background | Kaur A, Guan Y. Phantom limb pain: A literature review. Chin J Traumatol. 2018 Dec;21(6):366-368. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 Dec 4. |
| 19060132 | Background | Castel-Lacanal E, Marque P, Tardy J, de Boissezon X, Guiraud V, Chollet F, Loubinoux I, Moreau MS. Induction of cortical plastic changes in wrist muscles by paired associative stimulation in the recovery phase of stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 May;23(4):366-72. doi: 10.1177/1545968308322841. Epub 2008 Dec 5. |
| 10686179 | Background | Stefan K, Kunesch E, Cohen LG, Benecke R, Classen J. Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain. 2000 Mar;123 Pt 3:572-84. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.3.572. |
| 16857577 | Background | Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol. 2006 Aug;5(8):708-12. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70525-7. |
| 27080070 | Background | Bolognini N, Russo C, Edwards DJ. The sensory side of post-stroke motor rehabilitation. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016 Apr 11;34(4):571-86. doi: 10.3233/RNN-150606. |
| 33243615 | Background | Rossi S, Antal A, Bestmann S, Bikson M, Brewer C, Brockmoller J, Carpenter LL, Cincotta M, Chen R, Daskalakis JD, Di Lazzaro V, Fox MD, George MS, Gilbert D, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Ilmoniemi RJ, Lefaucheur JP, Leocani L, Lisanby SH, Miniussi C, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Peterchev AV, Quartarone A, Rotenberg A, Rothwell J, Rossini PM, Santarnecchi E, Shafi MM, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wassermann EM, Zangen A, Ziemann U, Hallett M; basis of this article began with a Consensus Statement from the IFCN Workshop on "Present, Future of TMS: Safety, Ethical Guidelines", Siena, October 17-20, 2018, updating through April 2020. Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Jan;132(1):269-306. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 24. |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D010468 | Perceptual Disorders |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D010149 | Pain, Postoperative |
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D010146 | Pain |