| Primary | Percentage Change in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Day 150 | Percentage change in LDL-C from Baseline (day 1) to Day 150, Inclisiran arm versus Ezetimibe and placebo. There were two estimands of interest in comparing efficacy of inclisiran as monotherapy against that of placebo or ezetimibe that differ on the treatment of interest used for each and the management of intercurrent events as follows:
- Monotherapy Estimand: Inclisiran as monotherapy compared to the use of comparator. This estimand uses a hypothetical strategy where participants who permanently discontinued treatment, died or used other LLTs were handled in a hypothetical scenario of what would have happened if the intercurrent event did not happen.
- Treatment-policy Estimand: Inclisiran as monotherapy compared to the use of comparator with or without other lipid lowering therapies (LLTs) added. This estimand ignored the use of other LLTs and treatment discontinuation. Deaths (if any) were handled as an unfavorable outcome using a composite variable strategy.
| Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage change from baseline | | Baseline, Day 150 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Inclisiran | Inclisiran s.c and Placebo p.o | | OG001 | Ezetimibe | Placebo s.c. and Ezetimibe p.o. | | OG002 | Placebo | Placebo s.c. and Placebo p.o. |
| | | Title | Denominators | Categories |
|---|
| LS Mean (Treatment Policy estimand) | | | Title | Measurements |
|---|
| - OG000-46.54(-50.20 to -42.88)
- OG001-11.17(-15.34 to -7.00)
- OG0021.37(-3.07 to 5.80)
|
| |
| | Group IDs | Group Description | Statistical Method | Statistical Comment | P-Value | P-Value Comment | Parameter Type | Parameter Value | Dispersion Type | Dispersion Value | Confidence Interval Sides | Confidence Interval % | CI Lower Limit | CI Upper Limit | CI Lower Limit Comment | CI Upper Limit Comment | Estimate Comment | Tested Non-Inferiority | Non-Inferiority Type | Non-Inferiority Comment | Other Analysis Description |
|---|
| Treatment Policy Estimand | ANCOVA | | <0.0001 | | LS Mean Difference | -35.37 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | -40.88 | -29.86 | | | | | Superiority | | | | Treatment Policy Estimand | ANCOVA |
|
| Secondary | Absolute Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Day 150 | Absolute change in LDL-C from Baseline (Day 1) to Day 150, Inclisiran arm versus Ezetimibe and placebo. There were two estimands of interest in comparing efficacy of inclisiran as monotherapy against that of placebo or ezetimibe that differ on the treatment of interest used for each and the management of intercurrent events as follows:
- Monotherapy Estimand: Inclisiran as monotherapy compared to the use of comparator. This estimand uses a hypothetical strategy where participants who permanently discontinued treatment, died or used other LLTs were handled in a hypothetical scenario of what would have happened if the intercurrent event did not happen.
- Treatment-policy Estimand: Inclisiran as monotherapy compared to the use of comparator with or without other lipid lowering therapies (LLTs) added. This estimand ignored the use of other LLTs and treatment discontinuation. Deaths (if any) were handled as an unfavorable outcome using a composite variable strategy.
| Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | mg/dL | | Baseline, Day 150 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Inclisiran | Inclisiran s.c and Placebo p.o | | OG001 | Ezetimibe | Placebo s.c. and Ezetimibe p.o. | | OG002 | Placebo |
|
| Secondary | Percentage Change in Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) From Baseline to Day 150 | Percentage change in PCSK9 from Baseline (Day 1) to Day 150 , Inclisiran arm versus Ezetimibe and placebo. There were two estimands of interest in comparing efficacy of inclisiran as monotherapy against that of placebo or ezetimibe that differ on the treatment of interest used for each and the management of intercurrent events as follows:
- Monotherapy Estimand: Inclisiran as monotherapy compared to the use of comparator. This estimand uses a hypothetical strategy where participants who permanently discontinued treatment, died or used other LLTs were handled in a hypothetical scenario of what would have happened if the intercurrent event did not happen.
- Treatment-policy Estimand: Inclisiran as monotherapy compared to the use of comparator with or without other lipid lowering therapies (LLTs) added. This estimand ignored the use of other LLTs and treatment discontinuation. Deaths (if any) were handled as an unfavorable outcome using a composite variable strategy.
| Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants with a valid assessment for the outcome measure. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage change from baseline | | Baseline, Day 150 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Inclisiran | Inclisiran s.c and Placebo p.o | | OG001 | Ezetimibe | Placebo s.c. and Ezetimibe p.o. |
|
| Secondary | Percentage Change in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) From Baseline to Day 150 | Percentage change in non-HDL-C from Baseline (Day 1) to Day 150, Inclisiran arm versus Ezetimibe and placebo. There were two estimands of interest in comparing efficacy of inclisiran as monotherapy against that of placebo or ezetimibe that differ on the treatment of interest used for each and the management of intercurrent events as follows:
- Monotherapy Estimand: Inclisiran as monotherapy compared to the use of comparator. This estimand uses a hypothetical strategy where participants who permanently discontinued treatment, died or used other LLTs were handled in a hypothetical scenario of what would have happened if the intercurrent event did not happen.
- Treatment-policy Estimand: Inclisiran as monotherapy compared to the use of comparator with or without other lipid lowering therapies (LLTs) added. This estimand ignored the use of other LLTs and treatment discontinuation. Deaths (if any) were handled as an unfavorable outcome using a composite variable strategy.
| Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage change from baseline | | Baseline, Day 150 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Inclisiran | Inclisiran s.c and Placebo p.o | | OG001 | Ezetimibe | Placebo s.c. and Ezetimibe p.o. | |
|
| Secondary | Percentage Change in Total Cholesterol (TC)/HDL-C Ratio From Baseline to Day 150 | Percentage change in total cholesterol/HDL-C ratio from Baseline (Day1) to Day 150, Inclisiran arm versus Ezetimibe and placebo. There were two estimands of interest in comparing efficacy of inclisiran as monotherapy against that of placebo or ezetimibe that differ on the treatment of interest used for each and the management of intercurrent events as follows:
- Monotherapy Estimand: Inclisiran as monotherapy compared to the use of comparator. This estimand uses a hypothetical strategy where participants who permanently discontinued treatment, died or used other LLTs were handled in a hypothetical scenario of what would have happened if the intercurrent event did not happen.
- Treatment-policy Estimand: Inclisiran as monotherapy compared to the use of comparator with or without other lipid lowering therapies (LLTs) added. This estimand ignored the use of other LLTs and treatment discontinuation. Deaths (if any) were handled as an unfavorable outcome using a composite variable strate
| Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage change from baseline | | Baseline, Day 150 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Inclisiran | Inclisiran s.c and Placebo p.o | | OG001 | Ezetimibe | Placebo s.c. and Ezetimibe p.o. | |
|
| Secondary | Percentage Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) From Baseline to Day 150 | Percentage change in Apo B from Baseline (Day 1) to Day 150, Inclisiran arm versus Ezetimibe and placebo. There were two estimands of interest in comparing efficacy of inclisiran as monotherapy against that of placebo or ezetimibe that differ on the treatment of interest used for each and the management of intercurrent events as follows:
- Monotherapy Estimand: Inclisiran as monotherapy compared to the use of comparator. This estimand uses a hypothetical strategy where participants who permanently discontinued treatment, died or used other LLTs were handled in a hypothetical scenario of what would have happened if the intercurrent event did not happen.
- Treatment-policy Estimand: Inclisiran as monotherapy compared to the use of comparator with or without other lipid lowering therapies (LLTs) added. This estimand ignored the use of other LLTs and treatment discontinuation. Deaths (if any) were handled as an unfavorable outcome using a composite variable strategy.
| Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage change from baseline | | Baseline, Day 150 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Inclisiran | Inclisiran s.c and Placebo p.o | | OG001 | Ezetimibe | Placebo s.c. and Ezetimibe p.o. | | OG002 |
|
| Secondary | Percentage Change in Apo B/Apo A-1 Ratio From Baseline to Day 150 | Percentage change in Apo B/Apo A-1 ratio from baseline (Day 1) to Day 150, Inclisiran arm versus Ezetimibe and placebo. There were two estimands of interest in comparing efficacy of inclisiran as monotherapy against that of placebo or ezetimibe that differ on the treatment of interest used for each and the management of intercurrent events as follows:
- Monotherapy Estimand: Inclisiran as monotherapy compared to the use of comparator. This estimand uses a hypothetical strategy where participants who permanently discontinued treatment, died or used other LLTs were handled in a hypothetical scenario of what would have happened if the intercurrent event did not happen.
- Treatment-policy Estimand: Inclisiran as monotherapy compared to the use of comparator with or without other lipid lowering therapies (LLTs) added. This estimand ignored the use of other LLTs and treatment discontinuation. Deaths (if any) were handled as an unfavorable outcome using a composite variable strategy.
| Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage change from baseline | | Baseline, Day 150 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Inclisiran | Inclisiran s.c and Placebo p.o | | OG001 | Ezetimibe | Placebo s.c. and Ezetimibe p.o. | | OG002 |
|
| Secondary | Change in Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] From Baseline to Day 150 | Day 150 / Baseline ratio in Lp(a) in Inclisiran arm versus Ezetimibe and placebo. There were two estimands of interest in comparing efficacy of inclisiran as monotherapy against that of placebo or ezetimibe that differ on the treatment of interest used for each and the management of intercurrent events as follows:
- Monotherapy Estimand: Inclisiran as monotherapy compared to the use of comparator. This estimand uses a hypothetical strategy where participants who permanently discontinued treatment, died or used other LLTs were handled in a hypothetical scenario of what would have happened if the intercurrent event did not happen.
- Treatment-policy Estimand: Inclisiran as monotherapy compared to the use of comparator with or without other lipid lowering therapies (LLTs) added. This estimand ignored the use of other LLTs and treatment discontinuation. Deaths (if any) were handled as an unfavorable outcome using a composite variable strategy.
| Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants with a valid assessment for the outcome measure. | Posted | | Geometric Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Ratio from baseline | | Baseline, Day 150 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Inclisiran | Inclisiran s.c and Placebo p.o | | OG001 | Ezetimibe | Placebo s.c. and Ezetimibe p.o. | | OG002 |
|
| Secondary | Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) | Incidence of TEAEs (regardless of seriousness) and SAEs by treatment group, including changes in laboratory results qualifying and reported as AEs. | Safety Analysis Set, all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | No | From first dose of study treatment on Day 1 up to Day 180 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Inclisiran | Inclisiran s.c and Placebo p.o | | OG001 | Ezetimibe | Placebo s.c. and Ezetimibe p.o. | | OG002 | Placebo | Placebo s.c. and Placebo p.o. |
| |