Evaluation of the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy the Omega System for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Evaluation of the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy the Omega System for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
This is a prospective, two-stage, multi-center, pilot clinical study to evaluate the safety/tolerability/efficacy of the Omega System device. The Omega arc-shaped implant is inserted by the Omega delivery system into the prostate tissue of subjects to relieve lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The study will first evaluate the Omega system on patients undergoing prostatectomy, which is not indicated for the device.
Stage 1
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Unable to comply with the clinical protocol.
Vulnerable population such as inmates or developmentally delayed individuals.
Any medical condition or treatment, which in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the procedure, such as:
American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) > 3.
Previous prostate surgery such as: TURP, stent implantations, laser prostatectomy, hyperthermia or another invasive treatment to the prostate.
Presence of an artificial urinary sphincter or stent(s) in the urethra or prostate.
Other urethral conditions that may prevent insertion of Delivery Device into prostatic urethra.
Previous rectal surgery, other than hemorrhoidectomy
Current gross hematuria.
Known allergy to nickel or titanium or stainless steel.
Stage 2
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Diagnosed or suspected prostate cancer. If suspected, prostate cancer must be ruled out.
Concomitant participation in another interventional study.
Unable to comply with the clinical protocol including all the follow-up requirements.
Vulnerable population such as inmates or developmentally delayed individuals.
Significant comorbidities which would affect study participation.
Any medical condition or treatment, which in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the procedure ,such as:
Previous prostate surgery such as: TURP, stent implantations, laser prostatectomy, hyperthermia or another invasive treatment to the prostate.
Compromised renal function due to obstructive uropathy.
Active Urinary Tract Infection (UTI).
Obstructive or protruding median lobe.
American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) > 3.
Known neurogenic bladder or neurological disorders that might affect bladder or function.
Recent myocardial infarction (less than three months).
Concomitant bladder stones.
Current gross hematuria.
Active or history of epididymitis within the past 3 months.
Presence of an artificial urinary sphincter or stent(s) in the urethra or prostate.
Confirmed or suspected malignancy of bladder.
History or presence of strictures in the anterior urethra or bladder neck contracture or detrusor muscle spasms.
Other urethral conditions that may prevent insertion of Delivery Device into prostatic urethra.
Bacterial prostatitis within the last 12 months.
Previous rectal surgery, other than hemorrhoidectomy.
Current uncontrolled diabetes (i.e., hemoglobin A1c ≥ 9%).
Known allergy to nickel or titanium or stainless steel.
fay@proarcmedical.com972-544-781-599
Tbilisi, 0159, Georgia
Sopoabazadze@yahoo.com
msilagava98@gmail.com+995 551 001 558
vshtaadze@gmail.com
kgabunia@tbhc.ge+995 599 577 977