A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Robot Pancreaticoduodenectomy Versus Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy
A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Robot Pancreaticoduodenectomy Versus Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy
laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPD) and Robot Pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD), as two minimally invasive methods of pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD), have obvious advantages over traditional open pancreaticoduodenectomy(OPD) in terms of reducing surgical trauma and hospitalization time, but there are few studies on their perioperative safety and prognostic effects.However, there are few studies on the perioperative safety and prognostic effects of both procedures. In this trial, the perioperative data and prognosis of both procedures were collected and analyzed through a prospective, multicenter approach to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of both procedures.
In this trial, subjects proposed for PD were randomly divided into two groups, LPD and RPD, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients in both groups were operated and received perioperative management under the same surgical team and were operated according to the standard PD surgical approach. Subsequently, perioperative clinical data and long-term prognostic data of subjects in both groups will be collected and statistically analyzed to explore a better surgical approach.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Chenguodong@usc.edu.cn(+86)15211450345
nhfykyb@163.com(+86)13789353900