Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study aims at evaluating spatially resolved gene expression profiles of pancreatic and ampullary adenocarcinoma at favorable prognosis after surgical resection, in order to identify molecular features associated to a less aggressive biologic behavior that may benefit from upfront surgery.
Despite technical improvements, surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is still burdened by poor survival outcomes of only 10% at 5 years, due to very high locoregional and distant recurrence rates. In order to improve such disappointing results, several studies are now focusing on the role of neoadjuvant treatment. Recent evidence shows that neoadjuvant treatment may achieve improved intention-to-treat survival outcome, increased rates of margin-negative resections and decreased incidence of lymph node metastases. However, all surgical series report that a limited subset of patients achieve long-term survival following radical surgical resection.
After a systematic review of the available evidence on molecular profiling of pancreatic adenocarcinoma published until today the investigators have undertaken a retrospective study aimed at investigating the presence of possible genetic factors associated to a less aggressive clinical behavior. Clinical, biological and pathological features collected in a prospectively maintained database of radical surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma will be retrospectively reviewed together with an analysis of molecular features on surgical samples belonging to patients radically operated at the National Institute of Cancer of Milan. Such features may be used to identify those patients who may benefit from upfront surgery; in such group, vascular resections and reconstructions could be considered more liberally.
The study will consist of 2 phases:
Due to the limited number, samples from patients affected by ampullary adenocarcinoma with favorable prognosis will be analyzed in one step and compared to matched cases with unfavorable prognosis (8 patients each, group C).
Following the identification of gene expression profiles both for pancreatic and ampullary adenocarcinoma, an external validation set will be enrolled in order to perform RNA-seq analysis on additional 60-80 surgical samples from other institutions and validate the prognostic relevance of the identified pattern in predicting a less aggressive disease course.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Favorable-prognosis pancreatic adenocarcinoma | Patients experiencing favorable prognosis (defined as RFS≥60 months) following resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma | ||
| Unfavorable-prognosis pancreatic adenocarcinoma | Patients experiencing unfavorable prognosis (defined as RFS<12 months) following resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Favorable-prognosis gene expression pattern | Identification of DSP gene aberrations associated to favorable prognosis (≥60-month RFS) after radical surgery for pancreatic and ampullary adenocarcinoma, through comparison of prognostically favorable and unfavorable gene expression profiles found in different tumor and microenvironment compartments. | 19/09/2022-29/09/2023 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| TCGA comparison | Comparison of the gene expression profile found at DSP with the TCGA database in order to confirm the clinical relevance of the identified gene expression pattern associated to prognostically favorable tumors | 19/09/2022-29/09/2023 |
| Clinical, biological and pathological factors |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
• Patients >18 years old undergoing surgical treatment with curative intent for pancreatic and ampullary adenocarcinoma between 1/1/2010 and 31/12/2017 with a regular follow-up and a RFS ≥36 months including:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A prospectively maintained database of patients with pancreatic and ampullary adenocarcinoma undergoing radical surgical resection from 1st Jan 2000 to 31st Dec 2017 in a single institution (HPB and liver transplantation Unit, National Institute of Cancer, Milan, Italy) will be used to identify patients at favorable and unfavorable prognosis.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute of Milan | Milan | 20133 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29537309 | Background | Torres C, Grippo PJ. Pancreatic cancer subtypes: a roadmap for precision medicine. Ann Med. 2018 Jun;50(4):277-287. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2018.1453168. Epub 2018 Mar 22. | |
| 29329208 | Background | Pihlak R, Weaver JMJ, Valle JW, McNamara MG. Advances in Molecular Profiling and Categorisation of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and the Implications for Therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2018 Jan 12;10(1):17. doi: 10.3390/cancers10010017. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Identification of clinical, biological and pathological prognostic factors associated to favorable prognosis (≥60-month RFS) after radical surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
| 19/09/2022-29/09/2023 |
| External validation of gene expression profile | External validation of the identified gene expression profile through gene expression analysis of surgical samples from patients undergoing radical surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a different institution | 19/09/2022-29/09/2023 |
| 32599886 | Background | Silvestris N, Brunetti O, Bittoni A, Cataldo I, Corsi D, Crippa S, D'Onofrio M, Fiore M, Giommoni E, Milella M, Pezzilli R, Vasile E, Reni M. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-Up of Exocrine Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Evidence Evaluation and Recommendations by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM). Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 24;12(6):1681. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061681. |