Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The clinical investigation is designed to primarily confirm the performance of KIO015 in improving the GAIS assessment, a subjective parameter, including skin roughness. A non-treated zone (untreated hemi-face) was used as comparator for exact evaluation of the zones between the treated and untreated ones The safety of KIO015 was also evaluated for confirmation of initial data.
For this purpose, 78 healthy subjects were injected in half of the face. In KIO015-PLUM, healthy subjects with signs of cutaneous aging and dehydrated skin on the face received either one or three dermal injections:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIO015 - Cohort 1 | Experimental | One injection of KIO015 on the hemi-face. The untreated hemi-face is used as a comparator. |
|
| KIO015 - Cohort 2 | Experimental | 3 injections at one month interval on the hemi-face. The untreated hemi-face is used as a comparator. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIO015 | Device | Innovative carboxymethyl chitosan-based biomaterial intended for intradermal injection |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Global aesthetic improvement with GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) | Clinical evaluation of global aesthetic improvement of the treated area with GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) evaluated by the investigator. Comparison to a non-treated zone. | 1 month after the first intradermal injection for both cohorts. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| For both cohorts combined, evaluation of cutaneous hydration in a sub-group of subjects not using hydrating agent | 1 month after the first intradermal injection | |
| Change from baseline of epidermis hydration with Corneometer® | For each cohort, change from baseline of epidermis hydration of the treated zone measured with Corneometer® |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Needle size | Comparison of the two sub-groups using different needles (30G and 32G) | 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
In terms of population
In terms of associated pathology
Subject with ongoing and/or uncontrolled and/or recently recovered (<6 months) depression or psychiatric disorders or any other disorder that may pose a health risk to the subject in the study and/or may have an impact on the study assessments.
Subject with severe, ongoing and uncontrolled diseases such as malignancy or history of malignancy, type I diabetes, liver failure, renal failure, lung/heart disease, neoplasia, malignant blood disease, tumor, HIV, or other major disease (e.g., systemic fungal infection).
Subject with recurrent porphyria, coronary insufficiency, ventricular rhythm disorders, severe hypertension, obstructive cardiomyopathy, hyperthyroidism.
Subject with any skin or systemic disease (acute and/or chronic), in the previous year, likely to interfere with the measured parameters or to put the subject to an undue risk.
Subject with known history of or suffering from autoimmune disease and/or immune deficiency.
Subject with current cutaneous inflammatory or infectious processes (e.g., acne, herpes, mycosis, papilloma, chronic eczema, atopic dermatitis …), abscess, unhealed wound, or a cancerous or precancerous lesion on the face.
Subject with multiple allergies, anaphylactic shock history, evolutive allergic pathologies.
Subject having history of allergy or hypersensitivity to one of the components of the tested device
Subject having history of hypersensitivity to lidocaine and/or prilocaine or local anaesthetics of amide type or one of the excipients of EMLA® 5% cream.
Subject having history of hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine (or similar product) or one of the excipients of alcoholic chlorhexidine 0.5%.
Subject predisposed to keloids or hypertrophic scarring.
Subject with coagulation and/or homeostasis disorders.
Subject with pigmentation disorders. Related to previous or ongoing treatment
Subject under anti-coagulant treatment (such as aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) or treatment liable to interfere with the healing process or hemostasis, during the previous month and during the study
Subject receiving any treatment that, in the opinion of the clinical investigator, may interfere with test results or put the subject to undue risk.
Subject undergoing a topical (on the face) or systemic treatment:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Patricia MOREL-MANDRINO, MD | Eurofins Dermscan Pharmascan | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eurofins Dermscan Pharmascan | Villeurbanne | 69100 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months (cohort 1 only) after each injection session. |
| Change from baseline of dermis hydration with Moisturemeter D® | For each cohort, change from baseline of dermis hydration of the treated zone measured with Moisturemeter D® | 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months (cohort 1 only) after each injection session. |
| Change from baseline of skin oxidative stress | For each cohort, change from baseline of skin oxidative stress from skin superficial sampling on the treated area at the different time points and comparison to a non-treated zone. | 7 days (cohort 1 only), 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after each injection session. |
| Change from baseline of epidermis hydration compared to a non-treated zone with Corneometer® | Comparison of both cohorts for the change from baseline compared to a non-treated zone of Corneometer® | At 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months after the last injection session in both cohorts |
| Change from baseline of dermis hydration compared to a non-treated zone with Moisturemeter® | Comparison of both cohorts for the change from baseline compared to a non-treated zone of Moisturemeter® | At 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months after the last injection session in both cohorts |
| Change from baseline of skin oxidative stress compared to a non-treated zone | Comparison of both cohorts for Change from baseline of skin oxidative stress compared to a non-treated zone | At 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months after the last injection session in both cohorts |
| For both cohorts combined, change from baseline of epidermis hydration of the treated zone, measured with Corneometer® and comparison to a non-treated zone | 1 month after the first injection |
| For both cohorts combined, change from baseline of dermis hydration of the treated zone, measured with Moisturemeter D® and comparison to a non-treated zone | 1 month after the first injection |
| Global aesthetic improvement with GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) | Clinical evaluation of global aesthetic improvement of the treated area with GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) evaluated by the investigator. Comparison to a non-treated zone. | 7 days, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months (cohort 1 only) after each injection session. |
| Pain felt by the subject using a subjective evaluation questionnaire | Evaluation of pain felt by the subject using a subjective evaluation questionnaire on skin improvement of the treated area. | Immediately after the injection session. |
| Subject satisfaction using a subjective evaluation questionnaire | Evaluation of subject satisfaction using a subjective evaluation questionnaire on skin improvement of the treated area. | 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months (cohort 1 only) |
| Difference in Global aesthetic improvement with GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) between Cohorts 1 and 2 | Comparison of percentage of subjects with an improvement of the GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) of the treated area, evaluated by the investigator between cohort 1 and 2 | At 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months after the last injection session in both cohorts |
| Difference in subject satisfaction between Cohorts 1 and 2. | Comparison of percentage of satisfied subjects using a subjective evaluation questionnaire on skin improvement of the treated area between cohort 1 and 2 | At 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months after the last injection session in both cohorts |
| Appreciation of the injection quality using a subjective evaluation questionnaire | Evaluation of the appreciation of the injection quality using a subjective evaluation questionnaire completed by the injectors | Immediately after the injection sessions |
| Evaluation of injection site reactions (investigator) | Percentage of injection site reactions recorded by the investigator | 7 days, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months (cohort 1 only) |
| Evaluation of injection site reactions (subject) | Evaluation of the duration and severity of the injection site reactions by the subject recorded in a diary. | During 30 days after each injection session. |
| Product safety | Collection of adverse events and concomitant treatments | Through study completion, up to 12 months |