Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
SUMMARY
Rationale: The use of an external cephalic version (ECV) to rotate the fetus from a non-cephalic to cephalic presentation reduces the rate of caesarean section by approximately two-thirds in term pregnancies with breech presentation. Reducing pain during external cephalic version can contribute to an increase in success rate and consequently reduce the number of cesarean sections. Literature about the effectivity of virtual reality (VR) on acute pain reduction seems promising.
Objective: The primary objective of this study is to explore the effect of VR on pain during ECV. Secondary objectives are the rate of successful ECV procedures and to explore tolerability, feasibility and patient satisfaction of VR use.
Study design: The study concerns a non-blinded, single centre, randomised controlled trial.
Study population: Eligible women who fulfill the inclusion criteria and are scheduled for an external cephalic version in the Zuyderland Medical Centre location Heerlen.
Intervention: The study population will be randomly divided into the intervention group (VR-group) or the standard care group. The intervention group can choose for an immersive guided relaxation VR experience or an interactive VR experience during the external version additional to the usual standard care. The participants randomised to the standard care group receive the usual standard care given during external version.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is pain measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS). A total of 42 patients have to be included in each group. This means that a total of 84 women will have to be included in the study.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Each participating woman is asked to complete a questionnaire after using VR and the degree of pain perception is questioned on the basis of a 0-10 score (NRS). The study population experiences a very small medical risk when participating to this study. They can experience side-effects of VR for example dizziness or nausea and in rare cases epileptic insults.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| VR group | Experimental | The intervention group can choose for an immersive guided relaxation VR experience or an interactive VR experience during the external version Immediately after the external version, a pain measurement is taken with regard to the pain during the ECV by means of the NRS score. After the ECV procedure, participants of the VR-group receive a structured questionnaire in which tolerability, feasibility and satisfaction of VR use is evaluated. |
|
| Standard care group | No Intervention | The participants randomised to the standard care group receive the usual standard care given during external version.Immediately after the external version, a pain measurement is taken with regard to the pain during the ECV by means of the NRS score. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual reality intervention performed through the Oculuc Go VR glasses | Device | The participants randomised into this group are offered a VR intervention during the external version for 5-10 minutes in addition to the standard care of an ECV. The VR is performed through the Oculus Go VR glasses. These women can choose for an immersive guided relaxation VR experience or an interactive VR experience (see descriptions below). The ECV expert executing the ECV will register immediately after the ECV which option the patients has chosen. Immediately after the external version, a pain measurement is taken with regard to the pain during the ECV by means of the NRS score. After the ECV procedure, participants of the VR-group receive a structured questionnaire in which tolerability, feasibility and satisfaction of VR use is evaluated. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change of pain during ECV when using VR (VAS, visual analogue scale) | pain score by VAS visual analogue scale minimum 0-maximum 10 (higher score is a worse outcome). | 15 minutes |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of successful ECV procedures | 15 minutes | |
| Patient tolerability, feasibility and satisfaction of VR use (questionnaire) | 15 minutes |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| M Wassen, Dr | Zuyderland MC | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zuyderaland MC | Heerlen | 6419 PC | Netherlands |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
The study population will be randomly divided into the intervention group (VR-group) or the standard care group. The intervention group can choose for an immersive guided relaxation VR experience or an interactive VR experience during the external version additional to the usual standard care. The participants randomised to the standard care group receive the usual standard care given during external version.
Not provided
Not provided
The study population will be randomly divided into the intervention group (VR-group) or the standard care group.
|