Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01MH130320 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will examine a new implementation strategy for the Youth Readiness Intervention (YRI), an evidence-based mental health intervention. The strategy will (a) leverage a delivery setting (schools) and workforce (teachers) used effectively in low- and middle- income countries; and (b) innovate with technology and mHealth tools to enhance mental health service delivery quality. The YRI will be implemented as an extracurricular resilience-building after school activity in Sierra Leone. Teachers will deliver the YRI and receive either mobile phone-supported supervision or standard in-person supervision. Mobile-based supervision will integrate WhatsApp, a free cross-platform messaging and voice service used widely throughout Africa, with mHealth digital tools. The mHealth tools will support supervision through key features, including voice activated content, fillable forms (i.e., YRI fidelity checklist), and visual dashboards to monitor fidelity. A hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness design will allow for evaluation of both mobile phone-based supervision as a new implementation strategy, and clinical effectiveness of the YRI on youth mental and behavioral health as secondary outcomes.
This study will examine a new implementation strategy for the Youth Readiness Intervention (YRI), an evidence-based mental health intervention. The strategy will (a) leverage a delivery setting (schools) and workforce (teachers) used effectively in low- and middle- income countries; and (b) innovate with technology and mHealth tools to enhance mental health service delivery quality. The YRI will be implemented as an extracurricular resilience-building after school activity in Sierra Leone. Teachers will deliver the YRI and receive either mobile phone-supported supervision or standard in-person supervision. Mobile-based supervision will integrate WhatsApp, a free cross-platform messaging and voice service used widely throughout Africa, with new mobile-based digital tools. The mHealth tools will support supervision through key features, including voice activated content, fillable forms (i.e., YRI fidelity checklist), visual dashboards to monitor fidelity, and training videos to support school-based YRI delivery.
The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework, a broad multilevel, context-sensitive implementation science model, will guide the study. A hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness design will allow for evaluation of both mobile phone-based supervision as a new implementation strategy, and clinical effectiveness of the YRI on youth mental and behavioral health as secondary outcomes.
Aim 1 (Exploration and Preparation) will investigate barriers and facilitators to successful YRI implementation aided by mobile-based tools in Sierra Leone's secondary schools. A mixed methods evaluation with teachers, principals, and government ministry officials will inform co-development of an implementation blueprint prior to YRI delivery. User-centered design methods will be used to adapt the mHealth supervision app and incorporate WhatsApp to create an integrated user model of mobile phone-based supervision. Aim 2 (Implementation) will examine the feasibility, acceptability, cost, and fidelity to the YRI delivered by teachers receiving mobile-based supervision compared with those receiving standard supervision via a mixed methods approach. Aim 3 (Impact of Delivery Approach on YRI Effectiveness) will compare the effectiveness of the YRI in improving mental health, emotion regulation and daily functioning in youth (aged 14-24) when delivered in school settings by teachers who receive either mobile-based supervision (N=480 youth) or those who receive standard supervision (N=480 youth). Aim 4 (Sustainment) will (a) investigate mechanisms of adoption and sustainment of the YRI delivered by teachers through a mixed methods evaluation with teachers, youth, and principals; and (b) conduct a cost-effectiveness and return on investment analysis to evaluate relative costs vs. benefits of the YRI from a broad societal perspective, including educational outcomes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| YRI+Mobile Supervision | Experimental | Youth Readiness Intervention delivered by teachers receiving mobile-based supervision |
|
| YRI+Standard Supervision | Active Comparator | Youth Readiness Intervention delivered by teachers receiving standard supervision |
|
| Control | No Intervention | Wait listed control |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Youth Readiness Intervention (YRI) | Behavioral | The YRI is a culturally adapted group intervention that integrates common practice elements of cognitive behavioral and interpersonal therapies. The YRI's core treatment elements target improving emotion regulation skills, interpersonal functioning, and problem-solving skills. The YRI has 12 session that last about 90 minutes. The YRI will be delivered in schools by teachers receiving either mobile-based supervision or standard, in-person supervision. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fidelity | Fidelity will be measured with the YRI Fidelity Checklist, a tool developed and tested in previous trials that is completed after each YRI session. | For 12 weeks, starting from the date of the first YRI session |
| Acceptability | Acceptability, or the level of satisfaction with the intervention, will be assessed with the Johns Hopkins University Implementation Science Questionnaire. The scale has 12 items scored on a 4-point Likert scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=A moderate amount, 4=A lot. Higher scores mean greater acceptability. | An average of 24 weeks |
| Appropriateness | Appropriateness, or the relevance and fit of the intervention, will be assessed with Johns Hopkins University Implementation Science Questionnaire. The scale has 12 items scored on a 4-point Likert scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=A moderate amount, 4=A lot. Higher scores mean greater appropriateness. | An average of 24 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| emotion regulation skills | Emotion regulation skills, or the ability to modulate emotional responses, will be measured with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. This is a 36-item scale and responses are scored on a 5-point Likert scale: 1=Almost Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Almost always. Higher scores indicate poorer emotion regulation skills. | An average of 24 weeks |
Not provided
School Inclusion Criteria:
School Exclusion Criteria:
Teacher Inclusion Criteria:
Teacher Exclusion Criteria:
Youth Inclusion Criteria:
Youth Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alethea Desrosiers, Ph.D. | Brown University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innovations for Poverty Action | Freetown | Sierra Leone |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25457927 | Background | Betancourt TS, McBain R, Newnham EA, Akinsulure-Smith AM, Brennan RT, Weisz JR, Hansen NB. A behavioral intervention for war-affected youth in Sierra Leone: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;53(12):1288-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Oct 2. | |
| 38310232 | Derived | Desrosiers A, Carrol B, Ritsema H, Higgins W, Momoh F, Betancourt TS. Advancing sustainable implementation of an evidence-based mental health intervention in Sierra Leone's schools: protocol for a hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness trial. BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 3;24(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17928-w. |
Not provided
Not provided
The PI and her collaborators will abide by the principles for sharing research resources and data, as described by NIH in NIH Data Sharing Policy and Implementation Guidance and more specifically in "Data Sharing Expectations for National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)-funded Clinical Trials". The data generated in this clinical trial will be entered into the NIMH Data Archive repository, as required by the Notice of Award, and presented at national and international conferences and published in a timely fashion. All final peer-reviewed manuscripts that arise from this trial will be submitted to the digital archive PubMed Central. Published data will be available in print or electronically from publishers, subject to subscription or printing charges. Research data that document, support and validate research findings will be made available after the main findings from the final research data set have been published.
Not provided
6 months after publication of study results
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000092862 | Psychological Well-Being |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010549 | Personal Satisfaction |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Anxiety and Depression | Anxiety and Depression will be measured with the Hopkins Symptom Checklist, a 25-item inventory that measures symptoms of anxiety and depression. Part I of the measure has 10 items assessing anxiety symptoms and Part II has 15 items assessing depression symptoms. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale: 1 = Not at all, 2 = A little, 3 = Quite a bit, and 4 = Extremely. Item scores are summed to derive scores for the total scale and subscales, i.e., anxiety and depression. Higher scores reflect worse functioning. | An average of 24 weeks |
| Functional Impairment | Functional Impairment will be measured by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule short-form. This scale contains 12 items and assesses functioning across five domains: mobility, self-care, understanding and communication, life activities and societal participation. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4) and summed to derive a total scale. Higher scores reflect worse functioning. | An average of 1 year |