Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aim to find out metabolic molecules in blood and urine which could identify high risk of advanced fibrosis in MAFLD patients via NMR-based metabolic profiling.
Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is currently the most common liver disease in the world, with an incidence of 29.81% in China. Studies have shown that the severity of liver fibrosis is the most important predictor of disease progression in patients with MAFLD, and the more severe the degree of liver fibrosis, the worse the prognosis. Therefore, discovering non-invasive indicators that can predict the risk and identify people at high risk of MAFLD with advanced liver fibrosis is essential for early clinical intervention in order to improve their clinical prognosis. Some non-invasive tests like Vibration-controlled Transient Elastography (VCTE), Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4), and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) have been used to evaluate the liver fibrosis state in MAFLD patients, but lack of prospect in metabolic molecular level. Nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR)-based metabolomic profiling can identify and quantify significant biological molecules in tissue extracts, body fluids (blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, saliva, etc.), and secretions, and has wide applications in the study of cancer and other metabolic diseases. Therefore, this study intends to collect the demographic characteristics and serological indicators of MAFLD patients detected by liver VCTE, and use NMR profiling to perform metabolomic analysis on their peripheral blood and urine samples, in order to discover potential non-invasive biomarkers that can be used to predict and evaluate MAFLD advanced liver fibrosis, and further verify these MAFLD metabolomic indicators that may be associated with advanced liver fibrosis through multi-center clinical studies, in an attempt to provide ideal non-invasive biomarkers for MAFLD progression prediction and clinical intervention monitoring.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAFLD-control group | Participants accepted health examinations including vibration-controlled transient elastography in Tongji and Union hospitals who are not MAFLD patients and are willing to participate in this study. |
| |
| MAFLD-high hardness group | Participants accepted health examinations including vibration-controlled transient elastography in Tongji and Union hospitals who are defined to have MAFLD and are willing to participate in this study. The risk of advanced liver fibrosis was estimated based on the LSM value, FIB-4 score, and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), and patients were then divided into groups of low and high hardness according to the risk measured, as shown below: High hardness group: participants meet one of the following three requirements: LSM≥ 11.4 kPa;9.9\ |
| |
| MAFLD-low hardness group | Participants accepted health examinations including vibration-controlled transient elastography in Tongji and Union hospitals who are defined to have MAFLD and are willing to participate in this study. The risk of advanced liver fibrosis was estimated based on the LSM value, FIB-4 score, and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), and patients were then divided into groups of low and high hardness according to the risk measured, as shown below: Low hardness group: participants who do not meet the requirements of the high hardness group are low hardness group: LSM < 9.9 kPaï¼›9.9\ |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMR-based metabolic profiling | Device | Clinical parameters and VCTE results of each patient will be collected. Patients will be grouped into two groups according to VCTE, FIB-4 and NFS, and undergo NMR-based metabolic profiling |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| NMR profiling to discover the difference of lipids and lipoproteins in peripheral blood and urine that can be used to predict liver fibrosis in MAFLD progression | NMR-based metabolic profiling was used to detect and compare the lipids and lipoproteins of peripheral blood samples of control groups and MAFLD participants including the high and low hardness groups as mentioned above. | follow-up up to 24 months |
| NMR profiling to discover the difference of lipoproteins in peripheral blood and urine that can be used to predict liver fibrosis in MAFLD progression | NMR-based metabolic profiling was used to detect and compare the lipoproteins of peripheral blood samples of control groups and MAFLD participants including the high and low hardness groups as mentioned above. | follow-up up to 24 months |
| NMR profiling to discover the difference of amino acid and their derivatives in peripheral blood and urine that can be used to predict liver fibrosis in MAFLD progression | NMR-based metabolic profiling was used to detect and compare the amino acid and its derivatives of peripheral blood and urine samples of control groups and MAFLD participants including the high and low hardness groups as mentioned above. | follow-up up to 24 months |
| NMR profiling to discover the difference of Carbohydrates and their derivatives in peripheral blood and urine that can be used to predict liver fibrosis in MAFLD progression | NMR-based metabolic profiling was used to detect and compare the Carbohydrates and their derivatives of peripheral blood and urine samples of control groups and MAFLD participants including the high and low hardness groups as mentioned above. | follow-up up to 24 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) comparison between control groups and MAFLD participants. | The insulin resistance index in different groups, as mentioned above, were calculated and analyzed, in order to explore the factors associated with insulin resistance and diabetes in MAFLD. HOMA-IR=(FPG×FINS)/22.5, FPG (mmol/L), FINS(mIU/L) | follow-up up to 24 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with MAFLD
Healthy controls:
Exclusion Criteria:
• Chronic viral hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease or excessive alcohol consumption (more than 30 g of alcohol per day for men and 20 g for women), decompensated cirrhosis;
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The cohort selected patients with and without MAFLD who underwent VCTE and serological tests.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bin Cheng, Doctor | Contact | 027-83663334 | bcheng@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Bin Cheng Doctor | Tongji Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tongji hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology | Wuhan | Hubei | 430030 | China |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Peripheral blood and urine samples are collected from participants.
|